From 6 Decem­ber 2011 any indi­vid­ual, com­pa­ny or organ­i­sa­tion is per­mit­ted to apply for a new .XXX (or triple X) domain name. Now that the sun­rise peri­od has end­ed, eli­gi­bil­i­ty will be deter­mined on a first come, first served basis.

.XXX domain names were approved by the Inter­na­tion­al Cor­po­ra­tion for Assigned Names and Num­bers (ICANN) ear­li­er this year and are designed for the adult enter­tain­ment indus­try. Web­sites with .xxx address­es will focus exclu­sive­ly on adult enter­tain­ment con­tent, and appli­cants will need to cer­ti­fy that they belong to that industry.

How­ev­er brand own­ers who are not mem­bers of the adult enter­tain­ment indus­try are able to apply to block a .XXX domain to ensure that their brand names and valu­able intel­lec­tu­al prop­er­ty are not reg­is­tered as .xxx domain names. In this way, the sys­tem will ensure that valu­able brands are not hijacked, and not sub­ject to poten­tial­ly sig­nif­i­cant brand dam­age by being asso­ci­at­ed with adult con­tent that may con­flict with the brand’s values.

If your busi­ness is con­cerned that a third par­ty .XXX domain reg­is­tra­tion using your brand name may dam­age your busi­ness­es rep­u­ta­tion or imply an affil­i­a­tion or asso­ci­a­tion that does not exist, you may wish to apply to block that name from being part of a .xxx domain name.

These new .XXX domain reg­is­tra­tions are sub­ject to exist­ing rights pro­tec­tion mech­a­nisms, includ­ing the Uni­form Dis­pute Res­o­lu­tion Pol­i­cy, but it may be more cost effec­tive for your busi­ness to pre-emp­tive­ly block a .XXX domain name that con­tains your brand name.

If your busi­ness would like to under­stand more about .XXX domain name reg­is­tra­tions, please con­tact Swaab Attorneys.

If you would like to repub­lish this arti­cle, it is gen­er­al­ly approved, but pri­or to doing so please con­tact the Mar­ket­ing team at marketing@​swaab.​com.​au. This arti­cle is not legal advice and the views and com­ments are of a gen­er­al nature only. This arti­cle is not to be relied upon in sub­sti­tu­tion for detailed legal advice.

Publications

Dis­missal for Dissent?

The recent unfair dis­missal deci­sion of the Fair Work Com­mis­sion, Shaun Turn­er v Dare­bin City Coun­cil [2025] FWC 1763, in which Deputy…

Con­struc­tion con­tract time­frames and their inter­ac­tion with the NSW Secu­ri­ty of Pay­ment legislation.

Mark Glynn, Con­struc­tion Part­ner at Swaab con­sid­ers the recent deci­sion of Shar­vain Facades Pty Ltd (Admin­is­tra­tors Appoint­ed) v Roberts Co (NSW)…

10 Tips For Stra­ta Reme­di­al Con­struc­tion Contracts

Are you won­der­ing why your stra­ta work to repair or main­tain your stra­ta build­ing is over bud­get, rid­dled with delays…

In the News

Press Release | New Senior Asso­ciate Appoint­ment — Joshua Bernie

With more than 10 years’ expe­ri­ence in stra­ta and con­struc­tion dis­pute res­o­lu­tion across Aus­tralia and the UK, Joshua brings with him…

Press Release | We are pleased to announce five senior pro­mo­tions in key prac­tice areas of the firm effec­tive, 1 July 2025

Con­grat­u­la­tions:Maris­sa Arag­o­na — AssociateRamesh Chamala — AssociateAaron Boz — AssociateWilliam Clement — Senior AssociateKel­lie Van Mun­ster — Spe­cial Counsel “I am per­son­al­ly delight­ed…

Michael Byrnes quot­ed in the arti­cle, “‘Creep­ing’ unfair dis­missal thresh­old will increase to $183k on 1 July”, pub­lished in HR Leader on 27 June 2025

Michael Byrnes quot­ed in the arti­cle, “‘Creep­ing’ unfair dis­missal thresh­old will increase to $183k on 1 July”, pub­lished in HR Leader…

Sign up for our Newsletter

*Mandatory information