You receive a let­ter from NSW Fair Trad­ing (OFT) in your inbox refer­ring to a com­plaint’ being lodged against you/​your agency and requir­ing infor­ma­tion to be pro­vid­ed with­in a few days. It’s daunt­ing to receive one of these let­ters, espe­cial­ly if it’s your first. You’ll be won­der­ing who com­plained, what did you do wrong, and are you now on OFT’s radar. We work with many agents to help them pre­pare their reply. Here are some prac­ti­cal tips to assist in your response. 

Do you need extra time to respond? Be mind­ful of ask­ing for extra time. In accor­dance with your oblig­a­tions under the Prop­er­ty and Stock Agents Act 2002 (NSW), the doc­u­ments request­ed should be read­i­ly acces­si­ble to pro­vide to OFT. If you want extra time because you’re over­seas, are you the licensee in charge? If so, did you noti­fy OFT and appoint an inter­im LIC in their absence? Chances are you may not have! By try­ing to gain more time, you may inad­ver­tent­ly expose your­self to a lack of super­vi­sion concern.

OFT will always ask for the following:

1. Your agency agree­ment and any revi­sions to the agency agree­ment or the esti­mat­ed sell­ing price (ESP).

2. Copy of your records used to sub­stan­ti­ate your ESP

  • This will include com­pa­ra­ble sales and a detailed descrip­tion of how you arrived at the ESP. It’s not enough to just pro­vide a few basic com­pa­ra­ble sales. The com­pa­ra­ble sales must be com­pa­ra­ble with the prop­er­ty you are sell­ing, even if the prop­er­ty is hard to price. If there aren’t suf­fi­cient­ly com­pa­ra­ble sales, you must be able to sub­stan­ti­ate how you used those prop­er­ties as a basis to form your opinion.
  • We have seen an exam­ple where an agent was sell­ing a 3brm apart­ment in the inner west of Syd­ney, but used 2brm apart­ments to sub­stan­ti­ate the ESP. How­ev­er, the prop­er­ty being sold was very dark, in a poor loca­tion, with small rooms and was run­down. The 2brm com­pa­ra­ble sales were sim­i­lar in size, but more mod­ern and with a bet­ter lay­out and loca­tion. In that instance, we were able to suc­cess­ful­ly demon­strate that the val­ue of those prop­er­ties was not dis­sim­i­lar to the 3brm apart­ment. Gen­er­al­ly, you should be care­ful to ensure that your com­pa­ra­ble sales are no more than 6 months old, spe­cif­ic to the type and style of prop­er­ty you are sell­ing, and there are at least 5 examples. 
  • If you increase your ESP too ear­ly in the cam­paign because of buy­er feed­back’, you leave your­self open to poten­tial under­quot­ing alle­ga­tions. OFT recent­ly took action against an agent who had revised their ESP after the first inspec­tion and reduced it in line with the val­ue feed­back expressed by 20+ buy­ers. The prop­er­ty then sold well over the guide, despite the buy­er feed­back stat­ing oth­er­wise. OFT took the view that the agent should not have relied on buy­er feed­back so ear­ly in the cam­paign to revise down their ESP, as they were the pro­fes­sion­als with years of expe­ri­ence as opposed to buy­ers with­out rel­e­vant experience. 

3. If you changed your ESP, you need to pro­vide evi­dence that you pro­vid­ed notice of the change to the ven­dor in writing. 

  • It’s a com­mon mis­con­cep­tion that ven­dors need to agree to a revi­sion of your ESP. This is incor­rect as it is YOUR ESP, not the ven­dor’s. You just need to be able to show that you pro­vid­ed your ven­dor with noti­fi­ca­tion of the revised ESP

4. Copies of your mar­ket­ing and adver­tis­ing material. 

5. Mar­ket­ing his­to­ry record from your CRM.

  • This is sought so that OFT can see what price you placed in the back end and if it is different/​lower than your ESP. We have seen many agents get caught out here, so you must ensure it matches. 

6. Copies of emails about the sale price between you and buyers.

  • Most agen­cies now use auto-respons­es on enquiries – pro­vid­ing a copy of these will suf­fice. If you’ve had addi­tion­al com­mu­ni­ca­tions with buy­ers in writ­ing where you have men­tioned price, you must also pro­vide those documents.
  • Keep in mind that if you try and with­hold infor­ma­tion from OFT because you think it may impli­cate you, the buy­er you had that cor­re­spon­dence with may be com­plainant who may have already pro­vid­ed the cor­re­spon­dence to OFT.
  • It is always rec­om­mend­ed to acknowl­edge any error and out­line how you intend to rem­e­dy it and ensure it doesn’t occur again. 

7. Any writ­ten ven­dor expec­ta­tions or require­ments for the sell­ing price.

  • We have had sit­u­a­tions where there are none, and that is suf­fi­cient. You will just need to explain that the ven­dor had no expec­ta­tions or require­ments and was hap­py to accept what­ev­er price you were able to achieve. 

8. A copy of the offers received and proof that you pro­vid­ed them to the ven­dor (in writ­ing) and their response.

  • This is where most agents slip up. They will often receive an offer via email or text and then call the own­er to dis­cuss, but they don’t always for­ward the offer to the ven­dor in writing.
  • Is a signed con­tract with a sec­tion 66W cer­tifi­cate waiv­ing the usu­al cool­ing off peri­od an offer? Does an offer in writ­ing but with extend­ed set­tle­ment terms and sub­ject to fur­ther con­tract reviews con­sti­tute an offer? In all instances, we rec­om­mend that you doc­u­ment any dis­cus­sions regard­ing price and noti­fy the ven­dor – includ­ing your com­ments about whether it is an offer or not.
  • Deter­min­ing if an offer is in fact an offer may affect the cam­paign. By law, if a ven­dor rejects an offer that is above the price guide, you must amend the guide to be no less than the offer reject­ed. But if a buy­er sub­mits an offer’ that is suit­able in terms of price, but not suit­able in oth­er aspects, it may not be an offer and no amend­ment to your guide is necessary.

9. A copy of all ven­dor reports.

  • There may be instances where you don’t have any, as the prop­er­ty sells ear­ly in the cam­paign. This is fine, you just need to dis­close the reason/​s why you don’t have any.
  • Some agents have week­ly ven­dor face-to-face meet­ings instead of writ­ten reports. Again, this is fine – you just need to explain this, but we rec­om­mend you main­tain file notes for your meet­ings that you can rely on or pro­vide them if necessary. 

10. A copy of the reserve let­ter (if applicable).

11. A copy of the auc­tion bid­ding sheet and bid­ders reg­is­ter (if applicable).

12. A copy of the sales con­tract (if sold, you should pro­vide both signed copies).

13. Any oth­er doc­u­ments or infor­ma­tion that will assist with your response.

We rec­om­mend you:

  • Pre­pare a cov­er let­ter, where you address any incon­sis­ten­cies you find in your files. You may also refer to your expe­ri­ence, rep­u­ta­tion and the pro­ce­dures you have in place to ensure you uphold all areas of compliance.
  • The cov­er let­ter should include head­ings for each doc­u­ment request­ed. You can use these head­ings to help cre­ate the nar­ra­tive for OFT so they under­stand how the cam­paign pro­ceed­ed. You should not just pro­vide doc­u­ments with­out prop­er context.
  • Clear­ly iden­ti­fy which doc­u­ments fall into which cat­e­gories. Giv­en the amount of mate­r­i­al is like­ly to be large, you may want to send your response in a drop­box or share dri­ve and pro­vide access to the OFT investigator.
  • Invite OFT to con­tact you direct­ly to dis­cuss any ques­tions or con­cerns with the doc­u­ments give you a fur­ther chance to address any ques­tions pri­or to OFT mak­ing a determination. 

If you have any ques­tions or require assis­tance in any respons­es to OFT, please feel free to con­tact the Real Estate team at Swaab.

Julie Briscoe jab@​swaab.​com.​au 

Sarah Heuv­el smh@​swaab.​com.​au 

If you would like to repub­lish this arti­cle, it is gen­er­al­ly approved, but pri­or to doing so please con­tact the Mar­ket­ing team at marketing@​swaab.​com.​au. This arti­cle is not legal advice and the views and com­ments are of a gen­er­al nature only. This arti­cle is not to be relied upon in sub­sti­tu­tion for detailed legal advice.

Publications

NSW Fair Trad­ing com­pli­ance | What to do if you receive a complaint

You receive a let­ter from NSW Fair Trad­ing (OFT) in your inbox refer­ring to a ​‘com­plaint’ being lodged against you/​your agency…

AS4000:2025 – What is all the fuss about?

With the recent release of the updat­ed AS4000:2025, for the first time in over 28 years, many stake­hold­ers in the con­struc­tion…

Arti­fi­cial Intel­li­gence Fol­ly Called Out by Fair Work Commission

In the recent Fair Work Com­mis­sion deci­sion Mr Bran­den Dey­sel v Elec­tra Lift Co.[2025] FWC 2289, Deputy Pres­i­dent Slevin applied a crit­i­cal…

In the News

Michael Byrnes has pub­lished an arti­cle titled Use of AI Crit­i­cised by FWC” in HR Leader on 2 Sep­tem­ber 2025.

Michael Byrnes has pub­lished an arti­cle titled ​“Use of AI Crit­i­cised by FWC” in HR Leader on 2 Sep­tem­ber 2025.To read the…

Michael Byrnes is quot­ed in the arti­cle, Fair Work warns lit­i­gants against using Chat­G­PT”, pub­lished in The Aus­tralian on 28 August 2025:

Michael Byrnes is quot­ed in the arti­cle, ​“Fair Work warns lit­i­gants against using Chat­G­PT”, pub­lished in The Aus­tralian on 2…

Con­grat­u­la­tions | Angela Har­vey & John Trinh for being recog­nised in 2025 Doyles Guide Rankings

We’re proud to announce that Angela Har­vey has been recog­nised in the 2025 Doyles Guide as a:Rec­om­mend­ed Lead­ing Estates Lit­i­ga­tion Lawyer…

Sign up for our Newsletter

*Mandatory information