In a major deci­sion aris­ing from its Fam­i­ly and Domes­tic Vio­lence Leave Review 2021 ([2022] FWCFB 2001) a three mem­ber Full Bench of the Fair Work Com­mis­sion (FWCFB) has formed a pro­vi­sion­al view that mod­ern awards should be var­ied to pro­vide an enti­tle­ment to 10 days’ paid fam­i­ly and domes­tic vio­lence (FDV) leave in a 12-month peri­od. That enti­tle­ment would be in addi­tion to the unpaid 5 days’ unpaid FDV leave that all work­ers are cur­rent­ly enti­tled to under the Nation­al Employ­ment Stan­dards (NES) in the Fair Work Act 2009 (FW Act).

The FWCFB has pro­posed that paid FDV leave would:

  • be paid at the employee’s base rate of pay’ as defined in the FW Act;
  • accrue in the same way as personal/carer’s leave under the NES (how­ev­er the total accru­al must not exceed 10 days at any giv­en time); and
  • not apply to casuals.

The def­i­n­i­tion of fam­i­ly and domes­tic vio­lence’ has been adopt­ed from the NES as vio­lent, threat­en­ing or oth­er abu­sive behav­iour by a close rel­a­tive’ (as defined in the FW Act) of an employee.

In terms of the inter­ac­tion between paid FDV leave in mod­ern awards and the NES enti­tle­ment to unpaid FDV leave, the FWCFB not­ed the mod­ern award pro­vi­sion does not exclude the capac­i­ty of employ­ees to access the statu­to­ry enti­tle­ment to unpaid FDV leave. The pro­posed mod­ern award vari­a­tions will there­fore not deprive employ­ees (as argued by an employ­er asso­ci­a­tion) of receiv­ing their full NES benefit.

The FWCFB observed that paid FDV leave is becom­ing increas­ing­ly com­mon in enter­prise bar­gain­ing and in over award’ arrange­ments in work­places, and pro­vides sig­nif­i­cant assis­tance to those expe­ri­enc­ing FDV. Expert evi­dence led by the ACTU also sup­port­ed a con­clu­sion that paid FDV leave would not have a sig­nif­i­cant neg­a­tive impact on the econ­o­my, and would be of some ben­e­fit to employ­ers (such as in rela­tion to improved pro­duc­tiv­i­ty and reduced absenteeism). 

It is not­ed that the Labor Par­ty has pre­vi­ous­ly indi­cat­ed that, if elect­ed, it would sup­port an amend­ment to the FW Act to include an enti­tle­ment to 10 days’ paid FDV leave.

The par­ties have until 17 June 2022 to pro­vide a draft mod­el FDV leave term in accor­dance with the pro­vi­sion­al views expressed by the FWCFB.

If you would like to repub­lish this arti­cle, it is gen­er­al­ly approved, but pri­or to doing so please con­tact the Mar­ket­ing team at marketing@​swaab.​com.​au. This arti­cle is not legal advice and the views and com­ments are of a gen­er­al nature only. This arti­cle is not to be relied upon in sub­sti­tu­tion for detailed legal advice.

Publications

Own­ers Cor­po­ra­tions / Asso­ci­a­tions now sub­ject to Unfair Con­tract Terms 

Under the new stra­ta law reforms com­menc­ing 1 July 2025 (the Stra­ta Schemes Leg­is­la­tion Amend­ment Act 2025 (No. 14) NSW) a key change…

Unfair con­tract terms in out­dat­ed stan­dard form con­tracts could cost you a fine of $50 mil­lion (Com­pa­nies) or $2.5 mil­lion (Indi­vid­u­als)

If you have not reviewed your stan­dard form con­struc­tion con­tracts since 9 Novem­ber 2023 (when the amend­ed Com­pe­ti­tion and Con­sumer Act…

Impor­tant Work­place Rela­tions Changes Effec­tive 1 July 2025

Employ­ers and employ­ees alike should be aware of impor­tant changes in the work­place rela­tions are­na, effec­tive 1 July 2025. From that date:the high income…

In the News

Michael Byrnes quot­ed in the arti­cle, “‘Creep­ing’ unfair dis­missal thresh­old will increase to $183k on 1 July”, pub­lished in HR Leader on 27 June 2025

Michael Byrnes quot­ed in the arti­cle, “‘Creep­ing’ unfair dis­missal thresh­old will increase to $183k on 1 July”, pub­lished in HR Leader…

Michael Byrnes is quot­ed in the arti­cle, ABC may face sig­nif­i­cant penal­ties’ after can­cel cul­ture’ sack­ing ruled unlaw­ful”, pub­lished in HR Leader on 26 June 2025

Michael Byrnes is quot­ed in the arti­cle, ​“ABC may face ​‘sig­nif­i­cant penal­ties’ after ​‘can­cel cul­ture’ sack­ing ruled unlaw­ful”, pub­lished in…

Michael Byrnes is quot­ed in the arti­cle, Pro­posed non-com­pete ban could back­fire on work­ers, firm warns”, pub­lished in Lawyers Week­ly on 20 May 2025

Michael Byrnes is quot­ed in the arti­cle, ​“Pro­posed non-com­pete ban could back­fire on work­ers, firm warns”, pub­lished in Lawyers Week­ly…

Sign up for our Newsletter

*Mandatory information