Part­ner, Nick Dale and Senior Asso­ciate, Sean Green­wood, recent­ly led the suc­cess­ful defence of a group of for­mer employ­ees of a major real estate fran­chise who left to join a competitor

Their for­mer employ­er sought inter­locu­to­ry injunc­tions restrain­ing our clients from work­ing in their new jobs. The deci­sion is high­ly sig­nif­i­cant because it inter­prets aspects of indus­try stan­dard employ­ment con­tracts for real estate agents, and rein­forces an ear­li­er deci­sion from 2020 involv­ing the same con­trac­tu­al claus­es. The deci­sion also reit­er­ates that it may be more dif­fi­cult to enforce non-com­pete claus­es where employ­ees are ter­mi­nat­ed for rea­sons beyond their own con­trol, and that restraints must be rea­son­able if they are to be enforced.

The case involved com­plex issues about non-solic­i­ta­tion of the for­mer employ­er’s clients and con­fi­den­tial infor­ma­tion, as well as employ­ment law issues sur­round­ing redun­dan­cy. Our clients had a con­vinc­ing win, with the inter­locu­to­ry appli­ca­tions against them being dis­missed with costs at the first avail­able opportunity. 

A link to the case is here

Nick and Sean instruct­ed Bernard Lloyd of Coun­sel, thank him for all of his skill­ful work and acknowl­edge the invalu­able con­tri­bu­tions of Esther Koo — Senior Asso­ciate , Daniel Miller — Asso­ciate, Suzi Sto­janovs­ki — Senior Asso­ciate and Cather­ine Aird — Legal Sec­re­tary to the outcome.

If you would like to repub­lish this arti­cle, it is gen­er­al­ly approved, but pri­or to doing so please con­tact the Mar­ket­ing team at marketing@​swaab.​com.​au. This arti­cle is not legal advice and the views and com­ments are of a gen­er­al nature only. This arti­cle is not to be relied upon in sub­sti­tu­tion for detailed legal advice.

Publications

Tem­po­rary Dis­con­for­mi­ty in Build­ing Defects: Myth, Not Law

The ​“tem­po­rary dis­con­for­mi­ty” argu­ment in con­struc­tion dis­putes sug­gests that defec­tive work iden­ti­fied before prac­ti­cal com­ple­tion is not a breach while the…

The impor­tance of a Request for Tender

Issu­ing a request for ten­der (RFT) is more than just secur­ing the best or low­est price. An RFT is your oppor­tu­ni­ty to man­age…

More Changes for Stra­ta — effec­tive 1 April 2026

The Fair Trad­ing and Build­ing Leg­is­la­tion Amend­ment Bill 2026 was passed by par­lia­ment dur­ing Feb­ru­ary 2026 with the changes effec­tive on…

In the News

Michael Byrnes appeared on the Game Chang­ers Radio pod­cast host­ed by Craig Bruce and Irene Hulme on 27 March 2026 to dis­cuss the First Case Man­age­ment Hear­ing in the pro­ceed­ings brought by Kyle Sandi­lands against ARN

Michael Byrnes appeared on the Game Chang­ers Radio pod­cast host­ed by Craig Bruce and Irene Hulme on 27 March 202…

Michael Byrnes is quot­ed in the arti­cle, Five more Kyle ques­tions answered: Would ARN have to pay a lump sum?”, pub­lished in Mum­brel­la on 25 March 2026

Michael Byrnes is quot­ed in the arti­cle, ​“Five more Kyle ques­tions answered: Would ARN have to pay a lump sum?”, pub­lished…

Michael Byrnes appeared on the Game Chang­ers Radio pod­cast host­ed by Craig Bruce and Irene Hulme on 25 March 2026 to dis­cuss devel­op­ments in the legal pro­ceed­ings brought by Kyle Sandi­lands against ARN.

Michael Byrnes appeared on the Game Chang­ers Radio pod­cast host­ed by Craig Bruce and Irene Hulme on 25 March 202…

Sign up for our Newsletter

*Mandatory information