In Brief

ACMA’s most recent­ly pub­li­cised enforce­ment action, against Cel­lar­mas­ter Wines Pty Ltd (part of the Wool­worths group) acts as a time­ly reminder that every busi­ness must take suf­fi­cient care in man­ag­ing its respon­si­bil­i­ties under the Spam Act 2003 (Act).


Swaab has observed that ACMA has ramped up enforce­ment action in respect of spam com­plaints over the last six months, impos­ing more sanc­tions and high­er penal­ties than in pre­vi­ous periods.

Under the Act it is ille­gal to send, or cause to be sent, unso­licit­ed com­mer­cial elec­tron­ic mes­sages, includ­ing email, instant mes­sag­ing, SMS and MMS (text and image-based mobile phone mes­sag­ing) of a com­mer­cial nature. Cor­po­rate infor­ma­tion or announce­ments that are pure­ly fac­tu­al and that do not mar­ket any prod­ucts or ser­vices are exclud­ed. Mes­sages cov­ered by the Act include prod­uct offers, pro­mo­tions, com­pe­ti­tions, adver­tise­ments and fac­tu­al infor­ma­tion that includes those types of content.

Under the Act, every ​“com­mer­cial mes­sage” that is sent must:

  1. be sent with the recip­i­en­t’s consent;
  2. con­tain accu­rate infor­ma­tion about the per­son or organ­i­sa­tion that autho­rised the send­ing of the mes­sage and how to con­tact them; and
  3. con­tain a clear, obvi­ous and func­tion­al ​‘unsub­scribe’ facil­i­ty to allow the recip­i­ent to opt out from receiv­ing mes­sages from that source in the future (and any unsub­scribe requests must be processed with­in five work­ing days of receipt).

Cel­lar­mas­ter Wines was penalised for send­ing mes­sages to cus­tomers who had pre­vi­ous­ly opt­ed-out of receiv­ing mar­ket­ing mes­sages. Some mes­sages were sent with­out an opt-out facil­i­ty. These errors result­ed in a $110,000 infringe­ment notice which was paid by Cel­lar­mas­ters in May 2013.

For more infor­ma­tion about spam, how to deal with an ACMA com­plaint or sup­port with ensur­ing that your busi­ness man­ages its respon­si­bil­i­ties under the Spam Act, con­tact our spe­cial­ist team at Swaab.

If you would like to repub­lish this arti­cle, it is gen­er­al­ly approved, but pri­or to doing so please con­tact the Mar­ket­ing team at marketing@​swaab.​com.​au. This arti­cle is not legal advice and the views and com­ments are of a gen­er­al nature only. This arti­cle is not to be relied upon in sub­sti­tu­tion for detailed legal advice.

Publications

Land­lords Beware: New Tobac­co Laws Could Mean Heavy Fines and Even Gaol Time

How Do New Tobac­co Laws Affect Land­lords in NSW?This year the NSW State Gov­ern­ment is crack­ing down on the sale of…

When is entry into a lot with­out the lot own­er’s con­sent per­mit­ted to car­ry out repair work to com­mon prop­er­ty? When there is an emergency

When is entry into a lot with­out the lot own­er’s con­sent per­mit­ted to car­ry out repair work to com­mon prop­er­ty? When…

A Short Sto­ry about Bullying

In the recent Fair Work Com­mis­sion deci­sion of Appli­ca­tion by Gary Whitham [2026] FWC 3322, Deputy Pres­i­dent Col­man gave short…

In the News

Michael Byrnes appeared on McK­night Tonight with Robert McK­night on 6 Octo­ber 2026 to dis­cuss the lat­est devel­op­ments in the Jack­ie ​‘O’ Hen­der­son v ARN case (from 5:40 to 20:00)

What hap­pened to the Jack­ie O and ARN court case, and why did the Fed­er­al Court hear­ing col­lapse in OctoberMichael Byrnes appeared…

Michael Byrnes is quot­ed in the arti­cle, “ ​‘You can’t force new con­tracts on employ­ees’ ”, pub­lished in TV Black­box on 4 Octo­ber 2026

Can an employ­er force employ­ees to sign a new employ­ment con­tract if they don’t agree to the changes?Michael Byrnes is quot­ed in…

Michael Byrnes is quot­ed in the arti­cle, ​“Jack­ie Hen­der­son and ARN’s court show­down post­poned”, pub­lished in Mum­brel­la on 2 Octo­ber 2026

Why was Jack­ie Henderson’s Fed­er­al Court tri­al against ARN Media post­poned, and what issues delayed the Octo­ber 2026 hearing?Michael Byrnes is…

Sign up for our Newsletter

*Mandatory information