In Brief

ACMA’s most recent­ly pub­li­cised enforce­ment action, against Cel­lar­mas­ter Wines Pty Ltd (part of the Wool­worths group) acts as a time­ly reminder that every busi­ness must take suf­fi­cient care in man­ag­ing its respon­si­bil­i­ties under the Spam Act 2003 (Act).


Swaab has observed that ACMA has ramped up enforce­ment action in respect of spam com­plaints over the last six months, impos­ing more sanc­tions and high­er penal­ties than in pre­vi­ous periods.

Under the Act it is ille­gal to send, or cause to be sent, unso­licit­ed com­mer­cial elec­tron­ic mes­sages, includ­ing email, instant mes­sag­ing, SMS and MMS (text and image-based mobile phone mes­sag­ing) of a com­mer­cial nature. Cor­po­rate infor­ma­tion or announce­ments that are pure­ly fac­tu­al and that do not mar­ket any prod­ucts or ser­vices are exclud­ed. Mes­sages cov­ered by the Act include prod­uct offers, pro­mo­tions, com­pe­ti­tions, adver­tise­ments and fac­tu­al infor­ma­tion that includes those types of content.

Under the Act, every com­mer­cial mes­sage” that is sent must:

  1. be sent with the recip­i­en­t’s consent;
  2. con­tain accu­rate infor­ma­tion about the per­son or organ­i­sa­tion that autho­rised the send­ing of the mes­sage and how to con­tact them; and
  3. con­tain a clear, obvi­ous and func­tion­al unsub­scribe’ facil­i­ty to allow the recip­i­ent to opt out from receiv­ing mes­sages from that source in the future (and any unsub­scribe requests must be processed with­in five work­ing days of receipt).

Cel­lar­mas­ter Wines was penalised for send­ing mes­sages to cus­tomers who had pre­vi­ous­ly opt­ed-out of receiv­ing mar­ket­ing mes­sages. Some mes­sages were sent with­out an opt-out facil­i­ty. These errors result­ed in a $110,000 infringe­ment notice which was paid by Cel­lar­mas­ters in May 2013.

For more infor­ma­tion about spam, how to deal with an ACMA com­plaint or sup­port with ensur­ing that your busi­ness man­ages its respon­si­bil­i­ties under the Spam Act, con­tact our spe­cial­ist team at Swaab.

If you would like to repub­lish this arti­cle, it is gen­er­al­ly approved, but pri­or to doing so please con­tact the Mar­ket­ing team at marketing@​swaab.​com.​au. This arti­cle is not legal advice and the views and com­ments are of a gen­er­al nature only. This arti­cle is not to be relied upon in sub­sti­tu­tion for detailed legal advice.

Publications

10 year long stop on build­ing defect claims rein­forced for con­tri­bu­tion claims

The recent deci­sion in For­tius Broad­way No 1 Pty Ltd V ACN 103 211 141 Pty Ltd (for­mer­ly known as Wat­pac Con­struc­tion…

A High­er Evi­den­tiary Bur­den for Work Orders: The Prac­ti­cal Impli­ca­tions of The Own­ers – Stra­ta Plan No 102171 v Ceerose Pty Ltd [2025] NSW­CATCD 137

The deci­sion in The Own­ers – Stra­ta Plan No 102171 v Ceerose Pty Ltd; Zone Q Mil­sons Point Devel­op­ment Pty Ltd v Ceerose…

Impor­tant Work­place Rela­tions Changes Effec­tive 1 July 2026

Employ­ers and employ­ees alike should be aware of impor­tant changes in the work­place rela­tions are­na, effec­tive 1 July 2026. From that date:the…

In the News

Roger Corn­forth Retires Fol­low­ing 45 Years of Dis­tin­guished Legal Practice

Roger’s career has been defined by trust­ed rela­tion­ships, prac­ti­cal advice and an unwa­ver­ing com­mit­ment to his clients. Begin­ning his legal…

Protest group los­es appeal to obtain gov­ern­ment documents

The cas­es — Mudgee Region Health Alliance v Min­is­ter for Finance, Domes­tic Man­u­fac­tur­ing and Gov­ern­ment Pro­cure­ment and Nat­ur­al Resources [2026] NSW­CATAD…

Michael Byrnes is quot­ed in the arti­cle, The PM v work­place stan­dards”, pub­lished in HR Leader on 8 July 2026

Michael Byrnes is quot­ed in the arti­cle, ​“The PM v work­place stan­dards”, pub­lished in HR Leader on 8 July 2026To read the…

Sign up for our Newsletter

*Mandatory information