Any orders made by the Fed­er­al Cir­cuit and Fam­i­ly Court of Aus­tralia (FCF­COA) should be fol­lowed unless an agree­ment is reached with the oth­er par­ent to vary or amend the Order. It is impor­tant that both par­ties under­stand what is required by them under the Orders, which includes tak­ing all rea­son­able steps to ensure the orders are com­plied with.

In cir­cum­stances of non-com­pli­ance by the oth­er par­ent, there are steps that can be tak­en to ensure the oth­er par­ent com­plies with the Order. Under the new­ly estab­lished FCF­COA, par­ents are able to seek the Court’s assis­tance with Com­pli­ance by way of fil­ing an Enforce­ment of a Par­ent­ing Order Appli­ca­tion or a Con­tra­ven­tion Appli­ca­tion. In more seri­ous cir­cum­stances, par­ties can file an Appli­ca­tion for Con­tempt, how­ev­er, such an appli­ca­tion would need to estab­lish the non-com­ply­ing par­en­t’s non-com­pli­ance is a fla­grant chal­lenge to the author­i­ty of the Court or a seri­ous dis­re­gard of that par­en­t’s oblig­a­tion under the orders. 

If a par­ent files a con­tra­ven­tion appli­ca­tion, and the Court finds the non-com­ply­ing par­ent has con­tra­vened the Order they may be able to con­tend that they had a rea­son­able excuse for the non-com­pli­ance. There are many cir­cum­stances that may estab­lish a rea­son­able excuse, includ­ing — if a par­ty did not under­stand the oblig­a­tions cre­at­ed by the Order, or if such non-com­pli­ance was rea­son­ably nec­es­sary to pro­tect the health or safe­ty of the par­ent and or child. 

The new­ly estab­lished FCF­COA has set up a Nation­al Con­tra­ven­tion List, which intends on list­ing all con­tra­ven­tion appli­ca­tions with­in 14 days of fil­ing, in an effort to prompt­ly address any alle­ga­tions of non-com­pli­ance. One of the Court’s pri­ma­ry pur­pos­es is to ensure com­pli­ance with a court order, how­ev­er, par­ties should bear in mind the Court’s over­ar­ch­ing pur­pose will apply to all pro­ceed­ings to ensure the just res­o­lu­tions of dis­putes accord­ing to law and as quick­ly, inex­pen­sive­ly and effi­cient­ly as possible. 

It is essen­tial to seek legal advice if the oth­er par­ent is not com­ply­ing with a par­ent­ing order. Con­tra­ven­tion appli­ca­tions are com­plex, and the court can impose sig­nif­i­cant penal­ties on a non-com­pli­ant par­ent. Fur­ther, if an appli­ca­tion has been filed with­out mer­it, it is in breach of the rules or is friv­o­lous, then a par­ty (or their lawyer) may face an order to meet the oth­er par­ties legal costs. 

If you would like to repub­lish this arti­cle, it is gen­er­al­ly approved, but pri­or to doing so please con­tact the Mar­ket­ing team at marketing@​swaab.​com.​au. This arti­cle is not legal advice and the views and com­ments are of a gen­er­al nature only. This arti­cle is not to be relied upon in sub­sti­tu­tion for detailed legal advice.

Publications

Where is my mind? The rise of con­tentious pro­bate pro­ceed­ings sur­round­ing the issue of tes­ta­men­tary capacity

In New South Wales, fam­i­ly pro­vi­sion and con­tentious pro­bate claims under the Suc­ces­sion Act 2006 (NSW) are increas­ing­ly focused on…

Kyle and Jack­ie O: The Work­place Rela­tions Law Perspective

The rela­tion­ship between show­busi­ness duos often comes to an acri­mo­nious end. Mar­tin and Lewis split at the height of their…

The Paper­cut Deci­sion and the Cur­rent Posi­tion on WFH

The FWC’s John­son v Paper­Cut Soft­ware deci­sion has renewed debate about the lim­its of work­ing from home rights. While some have…

In the News

Michael Byrnes appeared on The Quar­ter Hour, a radio indus­try pod­cast host­ed by Wade Kings­ley, to dis­cuss the legal aspects of the Kyle and Jack­ie O split, on 13 March 2026

Michael Byrnes appeared on The Quar­ter Hour, a radio indus­try pod­cast host­ed by Wade Kings­ley, to dis­cuss the legal aspects of the…

McK­night Tonight with Robert McK­night inter­views Michael Byrnes on the legal aspects of the Kyle and Jack­ie O split (from 28:25 to 51:00):

In this in‑depth inter­view, Michael Byrnes, Part­ner and employ­ment law spe­cial­ist, shares prac­ti­cal insights on work­place rela­tions, employ­ment law trends…

Michael Byrnes is quot­ed in the arti­cle, DIY jus­tice: The surge of self-rep­re­sen­ta­tion and its toll on the jus­tice sys­tem”, pub­lished in Lawyers Week­ly on 11 March 2026

Michael Byrnes is quot­ed in the arti­cle, ​“DIY jus­tice: The surge of self-rep­re­sen­ta­tion and its toll on the jus­tice sys­tem”…

Sign up for our Newsletter

*Mandatory information