In brief – Board min­utes can serve as cru­cial evidence

Hav­ing accu­rate min­utes is not just a for­mal­i­ty required under the cor­po­ra­tions law. Detailed min­utes may serve as the cru­cial evi­dence required to defend a direc­tor from charges of breach­ing of his or her duties, includ­ing charges of trad­ing while insolvent.


Def­i­n­i­tion and pur­pose of board minutes

A signed and record­ed minute is evi­dence of a pro­ceed­ing, res­o­lu­tion or dec­la­ra­tion to which the minute relates. Accu­rate board min­utes are an impor­tant resource for man­ag­ing the com­pa­ny and sup­port sound risk man­age­ment by pro­vid­ing a writ­ten record of board delib­er­a­tions and decisions. 

Board min­utes pro­vide evi­dence that a board has exer­cised care in deci­sion mak­ing. They also sub­stan­ti­ate that a board is oper­at­ing in accor­dance with legal require­ments, includ­ing the com­pa­ny’s con­sti­tu­tion and the reg­u­la­to­ry requirements.

Board min­utes assist in the man­age­ment of the company

Beyond being a legal pro­tec­tion, board min­utes also serve an impor­tant man­age­ment func­tion. Accu­rate min­utes are required in order to:

  • Con­firm any deci­sions made
  • Record any agreed actions to be taken
  • Record who has been allo­cat­ed any tasks or responsibilities
  • Prompt action from any rel­e­vant attendees
  • Pro­vide details of the meet­ing to any­one unable to attend
  • Serve as a record of the meet­ing’s pro­ce­dure and outcome
Com­pli­ance not universal

Despite the impor­tance of board min­utes, many com­pa­nies con­tin­ue to make inad­e­quate records of board meet­ings. This is regret­table because by neglect­ing this sim­ple task, direc­tors are depriv­ing them­selves of an impor­tant legal safeguard. 

In the event of legal action being tak­en against the com­pa­ny, min­utes of meet­ings can be used to prove that the direc­tors have tak­en all rea­son­able steps to act respon­si­bly, com­ply with legal require­ments and mit­i­gate risk. 

For fur­ther infor­ma­tion, please contact:

If you would like to repub­lish this arti­cle, it is gen­er­al­ly approved, but pri­or to doing so please con­tact the Mar­ket­ing team at marketing@​swaab.​com.​au. This arti­cle is not legal advice and the views and com­ments are of a gen­er­al nature only. This arti­cle is not to be relied upon in sub­sti­tu­tion for detailed legal advice.

Publications

Where is my mind? The rise of con­tentious pro­bate pro­ceed­ings sur­round­ing the issue of tes­ta­men­tary capacity

In New South Wales, fam­i­ly pro­vi­sion and con­tentious pro­bate claims under the Suc­ces­sion Act 2006 (NSW) are increas­ing­ly focused on…

Kyle and Jack­ie O: The Work­place Rela­tions Law Perspective

The rela­tion­ship between show­busi­ness duos often comes to an acri­mo­nious end. Mar­tin and Lewis split at the height of their…

The Paper­cut Deci­sion and the Cur­rent Posi­tion on WFH

The FWC’s John­son v Paper­Cut Soft­ware deci­sion has renewed debate about the lim­its of work­ing from home rights. While some have…

In the News

Michael Byrnes appeared on The Quar­ter Hour, a radio indus­try pod­cast host­ed by Wade Kings­ley, to dis­cuss the legal aspects of the Kyle and Jack­ie O split, on 13 March 2026

Michael Byrnes appeared on The Quar­ter Hour, a radio indus­try pod­cast host­ed by Wade Kings­ley, to dis­cuss the legal aspects of the…

McK­night Tonight with Robert McK­night inter­views Michael Byrnes on the legal aspects of the Kyle and Jack­ie O split (from 28:25 to 51:00):

In this in‑depth inter­view, Michael Byrnes, Part­ner and employ­ment law spe­cial­ist, shares prac­ti­cal insights on work­place rela­tions, employ­ment law trends…

Michael Byrnes is quot­ed in the arti­cle, DIY jus­tice: The surge of self-rep­re­sen­ta­tion and its toll on the jus­tice sys­tem”, pub­lished in Lawyers Week­ly on 11 March 2026

Michael Byrnes is quot­ed in the arti­cle, ​“DIY jus­tice: The surge of self-rep­re­sen­ta­tion and its toll on the jus­tice sys­tem”…

Sign up for our Newsletter

*Mandatory information