In brief – Board min­utes can serve as cru­cial evidence

Hav­ing accu­rate min­utes is not just a for­mal­i­ty required under the cor­po­ra­tions law. Detailed min­utes may serve as the cru­cial evi­dence required to defend a direc­tor from charges of breach­ing of his or her duties, includ­ing charges of trad­ing while insolvent.


Def­i­n­i­tion and pur­pose of board minutes

A signed and record­ed minute is evi­dence of a pro­ceed­ing, res­o­lu­tion or dec­la­ra­tion to which the minute relates. Accu­rate board min­utes are an impor­tant resource for man­ag­ing the com­pa­ny and sup­port sound risk man­age­ment by pro­vid­ing a writ­ten record of board delib­er­a­tions and decisions. 

Board min­utes pro­vide evi­dence that a board has exer­cised care in deci­sion mak­ing. They also sub­stan­ti­ate that a board is oper­at­ing in accor­dance with legal require­ments, includ­ing the com­pa­ny’s con­sti­tu­tion and the reg­u­la­to­ry requirements.

Board min­utes assist in the man­age­ment of the company

Beyond being a legal pro­tec­tion, board min­utes also serve an impor­tant man­age­ment func­tion. Accu­rate min­utes are required in order to:

  • Con­firm any deci­sions made
  • Record any agreed actions to be taken
  • Record who has been allo­cat­ed any tasks or responsibilities
  • Prompt action from any rel­e­vant attendees
  • Pro­vide details of the meet­ing to any­one unable to attend
  • Serve as a record of the meet­ing’s pro­ce­dure and outcome
Com­pli­ance not universal

Despite the impor­tance of board min­utes, many com­pa­nies con­tin­ue to make inad­e­quate records of board meet­ings. This is regret­table because by neglect­ing this sim­ple task, direc­tors are depriv­ing them­selves of an impor­tant legal safeguard. 

In the event of legal action being tak­en against the com­pa­ny, min­utes of meet­ings can be used to prove that the direc­tors have tak­en all rea­son­able steps to act respon­si­bly, com­ply with legal require­ments and mit­i­gate risk. 

For fur­ther infor­ma­tion, please contact:

If you would like to repub­lish this arti­cle, it is gen­er­al­ly approved, but pri­or to doing so please con­tact the Mar­ket­ing team at marketing@​swaab.​com.​au. This arti­cle is not legal advice and the views and com­ments are of a gen­er­al nature only. This arti­cle is not to be relied upon in sub­sti­tu­tion for detailed legal advice.

Publications

10 year long stop on build­ing defect claims rein­forced for con­tri­bu­tion claims

The recent deci­sion in For­tius Broad­way No 1 Pty Ltd V ACN 103 211 141 Pty Ltd (for­mer­ly known as Wat­pac Con­struc­tion…

A High­er Evi­den­tiary Bur­den for Work Orders: The Prac­ti­cal Impli­ca­tions of The Own­ers – Stra­ta Plan No 102171 v Ceerose Pty Ltd [2025] NSW­CATCD 137

The deci­sion in The Own­ers – Stra­ta Plan No 102171 v Ceerose Pty Ltd; Zone Q Mil­sons Point Devel­op­ment Pty Ltd v Ceerose…

Impor­tant Work­place Rela­tions Changes Effec­tive 1 July 2026

Employ­ers and employ­ees alike should be aware of impor­tant changes in the work­place rela­tions are­na, effec­tive 1 July 2026. From that date:the…

In the News

Roger Corn­forth Retires Fol­low­ing 45 Years of Dis­tin­guished Legal Practice

Roger’s career has been defined by trust­ed rela­tion­ships, prac­ti­cal advice and an unwa­ver­ing com­mit­ment to his clients. Begin­ning his legal…

Protest group los­es appeal to obtain gov­ern­ment documents

The cas­es — Mudgee Region Health Alliance v Min­is­ter for Finance, Domes­tic Man­u­fac­tur­ing and Gov­ern­ment Pro­cure­ment and Nat­ur­al Resources [2026] NSW­CATAD…

Michael Byrnes is quot­ed in the arti­cle, The PM v work­place stan­dards”, pub­lished in HR Leader on 8 July 2026

Michael Byrnes is quot­ed in the arti­cle, ​“The PM v work­place stan­dards”, pub­lished in HR Leader on 8 July 2026To read the…

Sign up for our Newsletter

*Mandatory information