In brief – Board min­utes can serve as cru­cial evidence

Hav­ing accu­rate min­utes is not just a for­mal­i­ty required under the cor­po­ra­tions law. Detailed min­utes may serve as the cru­cial evi­dence required to defend a direc­tor from charges of breach­ing of his or her duties, includ­ing charges of trad­ing while insolvent.


Def­i­n­i­tion and pur­pose of board minutes

A signed and record­ed minute is evi­dence of a pro­ceed­ing, res­o­lu­tion or dec­la­ra­tion to which the minute relates. Accu­rate board min­utes are an impor­tant resource for man­ag­ing the com­pa­ny and sup­port sound risk man­age­ment by pro­vid­ing a writ­ten record of board delib­er­a­tions and decisions. 

Board min­utes pro­vide evi­dence that a board has exer­cised care in deci­sion mak­ing. They also sub­stan­ti­ate that a board is oper­at­ing in accor­dance with legal require­ments, includ­ing the com­pa­ny’s con­sti­tu­tion and the reg­u­la­to­ry requirements.

Board min­utes assist in the man­age­ment of the company

Beyond being a legal pro­tec­tion, board min­utes also serve an impor­tant man­age­ment func­tion. Accu­rate min­utes are required in order to:

  • Con­firm any deci­sions made
  • Record any agreed actions to be taken
  • Record who has been allo­cat­ed any tasks or responsibilities
  • Prompt action from any rel­e­vant attendees
  • Pro­vide details of the meet­ing to any­one unable to attend
  • Serve as a record of the meet­ing’s pro­ce­dure and outcome
Com­pli­ance not universal

Despite the impor­tance of board min­utes, many com­pa­nies con­tin­ue to make inad­e­quate records of board meet­ings. This is regret­table because by neglect­ing this sim­ple task, direc­tors are depriv­ing them­selves of an impor­tant legal safeguard. 

In the event of legal action being tak­en against the com­pa­ny, min­utes of meet­ings can be used to prove that the direc­tors have tak­en all rea­son­able steps to act respon­si­bly, com­ply with legal require­ments and mit­i­gate risk. 

For fur­ther infor­ma­tion, please contact:

If you would like to repub­lish this arti­cle, it is gen­er­al­ly approved, but pri­or to doing so please con­tact the Mar­ket­ing team at marketing@​swaab.​com.​au. This arti­cle is not legal advice and the views and com­ments are of a gen­er­al nature only. This arti­cle is not to be relied upon in sub­sti­tu­tion for detailed legal advice.

Publications

Using your con­struc­tion con­tract to man­age and mit­i­gate con­trac­tor insol­ven­cy risk

Intro­duc­tionThe risk of con­trac­tor insol­ven­cy mid way though a con­struc­tion project in the cur­rent mar­ket is real and real­ly expensive.This arti­cle pro­vides…

NSW Fair Trad­ing com­pli­ance | What to do if you receive a complaint

You receive a let­ter from NSW Fair Trad­ing (OFT) in your inbox refer­ring to a ​‘com­plaint’ being lodged against you/​your agency…

AS4000:2025 – What is all the fuss about?

With the recent release of the updat­ed AS4000:2025, for the first time in over 28 years, many stake­hold­ers in the con­struc­tion…

In the News

Michael Byrnes has pub­lished an arti­cle titled Use of AI Crit­i­cised by FWC” in HR Leader on 2 Sep­tem­ber 2025.

Michael Byrnes has pub­lished an arti­cle titled ​“Use of AI Crit­i­cised by FWC” in HR Leader on 2 Sep­tem­ber 2025.To read the…

Michael Byrnes is quot­ed in the arti­cle, Fair Work warns lit­i­gants against using Chat­G­PT”, pub­lished in The Aus­tralian on 28 August 2025:

Michael Byrnes is quot­ed in the arti­cle, ​“Fair Work warns lit­i­gants against using Chat­G­PT”, pub­lished in The Aus­tralian on 2…

Con­grat­u­la­tions | Angela Har­vey & John Trinh for being recog­nised in 2025 Doyles Guide Rankings

We’re proud to announce that Angela Har­vey has been recog­nised in the 2025 Doyles Guide as a:Rec­om­mend­ed Lead­ing Estates Lit­i­ga­tion Lawyer…

Sign up for our Newsletter

*Mandatory information