The COVID-19 Leg­is­la­tion Amend­ment (Emer­gency Mea­sures) Bill 2020 (Bill) was passed last night and received roy­al assent today.

The Bill intro­duces Part 11 into the Retail Leas­es Act 1994 (RLA) (which is a new part).

The new Part 11 pro­vides that reg­u­la­tions MAY pro­vide for cer­tain mat­ters for the pur­pose of respond­ing to the pub­lic health emer­gency caused by COVID-19 pan­dem­ic as follows:

a.

pro­hibit­ing the recov­ery of pos­ses­sion of premis­es by a land­lord in par­tic­u­lar cir­cum­stances;

b.

pro­hibit­ing the ter­mi­na­tion of a lease by a land­lord in par­tic­u­lar cir­cum­stances;

c.

reg­u­lat­ing or pre­vent­ing a land­lord from exer­cis­ing or enforc­ing anoth­er right in par­tic­u­lar circumstances;

d.

exempt­ing a ten­ant, or a class of ten­ants, from the oper­a­tion of the RLA or any agree­ment relat­ing to the leas­ing of premises.

A cou­ple of impor­tant points:

  1. No reg­u­la­tions have been enact­ed at the time of writ­ing this note.
  2. The reg­u­la­tions can only be made if Par­lia­ment is not sit­ting, and is unlike­ly to sit with­in 2 weeks after the reg­u­la­tion is made and, in the Minister’s opin­ion, the reg­u­la­tion is rea­son­able to pro­tect the health, safe­ty and wel­fare of lessees under the RLA.
  3. Reg­u­la­tions made under the above pro­vi­sion expire 6 months after the reg­u­la­tion com­mences, unless Par­lia­ment resolves an ear­li­er expiry.
  4. Part 11 applies not only to the RLA but to any oth­er Act relat­ing to the leas­ing of premis­es or land for com­mer­cial pur­pos­es”. It is there­fore pos­si­ble that the amend­ment results in a reg­u­la­tion being made under leg­is­la­tion which gov­erns com­mer­cial leas­es or leas­es not caught by the RLA.

More to fol­low as it comes to hand.


Kind regards

Mary Digiglio

If you would like to repub­lish this arti­cle, it is gen­er­al­ly approved, but pri­or to doing so please con­tact the Mar­ket­ing team at marketing@​swaab.​com.​au. This arti­cle is not legal advice and the views and com­ments are of a gen­er­al nature only. This arti­cle is not to be relied upon in sub­sti­tu­tion for detailed legal advice.

Publications

Work­place Rela­tion­ships: The Legal Posi­tion (Cold­play Con­cert Edition)

The recent sto­ry of col­leagues (a Chief Exec­u­tive Offi­cer and Chief Peo­ple Offi­cer (CPO)) whose appar­ent rela­tion­ship was cap­tured on…

Dis­missal for Dissent?

The recent unfair dis­missal deci­sion of the Fair Work Com­mis­sion, Shaun Turn­er v Dare­bin City Coun­cil [2025] FWC 1763, in which Deputy…

Con­struc­tion con­tract time­frames and their inter­ac­tion with the NSW Secu­ri­ty of Pay­ment legislation.

Mark Glynn, Con­struc­tion Part­ner at Swaab con­sid­ers the recent deci­sion of Shar­vain Facades Pty Ltd (Admin­is­tra­tors Appoint­ed) v Roberts Co (NSW)…

In the News

Michael Byrnes appeared on Break­fast with Tim Web­ster on 2SM on 23 July 2025 to dis­cuss work­place rela­tion­ships and that Cold­play concert

Michael Byrnes appeared on Break­fast with Tim Web­ster on 2SM on 23 July 2025 to dis­cuss work­place rela­tion­ships and that…

Michael Byrnes is quot­ed in the arti­cle, Cold­play con­tro­ver­sy expos­es HR vul­ner­a­bil­i­ty in lead­er­ship rela­tion­ships”, pub­lished in HR Leader on 23 July 2025

Michael Byrnes is quot­ed in the arti­cle, ​“Cold­play con­tro­ver­sy expos­es HR vul­ner­a­bil­i­ty in lead­er­ship rela­tion­ships”, pub­lished in HR Leader on…

Michael Byrnes’ arti­cle 7 com­mon ques­tions about work­place rela­tion­ships”, was pub­lished on HRM Online on 22 July 2025

Michael Byrnes’ arti­cle ​“7 com­mon ques­tions about work­place rela­tion­ships”, was pub­lished on HRM Online on 22 July 2025To read the full…

Sign up for our Newsletter

*Mandatory information