In the recent deci­sion of Wol­londil­ly Shire Coun­cil v Kennedy [2023] NSWLEC 53 the Land and Envi­ron­ment Court has held that the fail­ure by a cer­ti­fi­er or con­sent author­i­ty to include the pur­pose’ of devel­op­ment in a Com­ply­ing Devel­op­ment Cer­tifi­cate could ren­der that cer­tifi­cate invalid. 

Impli­ca­tions

  • A com­ply­ing devel­op­ment cer­tifi­cate can only be issued for a per­mit­ted purpose.
  • Cer­ti­fiers and con­sent author­i­ties should take all nec­es­sary steps to sat­is­fy them­selves that the devel­op­ment is com­ply­ing before issu­ing a com­ply­ing devel­op­ment certificate. 
  • The issuance of a com­ply­ing devel­op­ment cer­tifi­cate does not pro­tect a landown­er from pro­ceed­ings com­menced by coun­cil to declare that com­ply­ing devel­op­ment cer­tifi­cate invalid.

Back­ground

On 28 Octo­ber 2021, a cer­ti­fi­er issued a com­ply­ing devel­op­ment cer­tifi­cate (CDC) to a landown­er, autho­ris­ing the con­struc­tion of a detached shed’ on land locat­ed in Caw­dor, NSW. The pro­posed shed, with an area of almost 1,400 m², was intend­ed by the landown­er to be used to store his car col­lec­tion. How­ev­er, the cer­ti­fi­er was not aware of the landown­er’s inten­tion in this regard. Fol­low­ing a com­plaint by a neigh­bour dur­ing the con­struc­tion of the shed, the local coun­cil sent an offi­cer to investigate. 

The Coun­cil com­menced pro­ceed­ings in the Land and Envi­ron­ment Court chal­leng­ing the valid­i­ty of the CDC on numer­ous grounds. Of par­tic­u­lar note, the Coun­cil alleged that the CDC pur­port­ed to autho­rise the car­ry­ing out of devel­op­ment which was not con­sid­ered com­ply­ing devel­op­ment with­in the mean­ing of cl 3A.5 of Part 3A Rur­al Hous­ing Code’ of the State Envi­ron­men­tal Plan­ning Pol­i­cy (Exempt and Com­ply­ing Devel­op­ment Code) 2008 (NSW) (Codes SEPP).

This was on the basis that the CDC did not iden­ti­fy the pur­pose for the shed and accord­ing­ly the devel­op­ment pur­port­ed to be approved by the CDC could not be char­ac­terised as com­ply­ing devel­op­ment which may be car­ried out on the land for the pur­pose of s 4.6 of the EPA Act and the Codes SEPP.

How to Con­strue the CDC

The Court first­ly had to con­sid­er the prop­er man­ner in which to con­strue the CDC. In doing so, Pain J made the fol­low­ing com­ments and findings:

  1. Devel­op­ment con­sent, as defined by s 1.4 of the EPA Act, includes a CDC unless express­ly excluded.
  2. A CDC oper­ates in rem and its terms should be clear on its face, or at the most, by ref­er­ence to doc­u­ments oth­er­wise incor­po­rat­ed into it, in lim­it­ed cir­cum­stances [45].
  3. Extrin­sic evi­dence, such as con­ver­sa­tions and emails between peo­ple before a CDC is issued can­not assist in con­stru­ing a CDC [46].

If you would like to repub­lish this arti­cle, it is gen­er­al­ly approved, but pri­or to doing so please con­tact the Mar­ket­ing team at marketing@​swaab.​com.​au. This arti­cle is not legal advice and the views and com­ments are of a gen­er­al nature only. This arti­cle is not to be relied upon in sub­sti­tu­tion for detailed legal advice.

Publications

Cur­rent state of the con­struc­tion and infra­struc­ture market

The build­ing and con­struc­tion indus­try is sig­nif­i­cant and com­plex, with a land­scape which is con­stant­ly changing.It is cur­rent­ly char­ac­terised by: sig­nif­i­cant pub­lic invest­ment in…

Q&A with Swaab's new building and construction partner, Mark Glynn

Why did you choose Swaab?When I first met with Mary Digiglio, Swaab’s man­ag­ing part­ner and Helen Kow­al, part­ner con­struc­tion and stra­ta and…

Might a Receiv­er of a dis­tressed devel­op­ment project owe a duty of care to sub­se­quent own­ers of the lots when completed?

Upon tak­ing pos­ses­sion and con­trol of an incom­plete dis­tressed devel­op­ment asset, a secured financier will more often than not look to…

In the News

Michael Byrnes is quot­ed in the arti­cle, Pro­posed non-com­pete ban could back­fire on work­ers, firm warns”, pub­lished in Lawyers Week­ly on 20 May 2025

Michael Byrnes is quot­ed in the arti­cle, ​“Pro­posed non-com­pete ban could back­fire on work­ers, firm warns”, pub­lished in Lawyers Week­ly…

Press Release | Swaab’s James Skel­ton Appoint­ed Chair of Glob­al Emerg­ing Lead­ers Advi­so­ry Board at Mer­i­tas AGM in Mex­i­co City

In this piv­otal lead­er­ship role, James will guide ini­tia­tives to strength­en rela­tion­ships among Emerg­ing Lead­ers across Mer­i­tas’ 175 glob­al mem­ber…

Press Release | New Part­ner Appoint­ment — Mark Glynn

With over two decades in the indus­try, Mark is a recog­nised front-end con­struc­tion lawyer spe­cial­ist with­in the build­ing and con­struc­tion indus­try. Mark…

Sign up for our Newsletter

*Mandatory information