The New South Wales Gov­ern­ment has amend­ed Local Envi­ron­men­tal Plans to replace Busi­ness and Indus­tri­al Zones with new Employ­ment Zones’. 

The changes have been a long time in the mak­ing. Orig­i­nal­ly devel­oped under the for­mer Min­is­ter for Plan­ning back in May of 2021, the reforms fol­low the Pro­duc­tiv­i­ty Com­mis­sion’s 2021 White Paper Reboot­ing the Econ­o­my’ which rec­om­mend­ed ratio­nal­i­sa­tion of exist­ing busi­ness and indus­tri­al zones by reduc­ing the over­all num­ber of these zones and broad­en­ing their per­mis­si­ble activities. 

The inten­tion of the new zones is to pro­mote flex­i­bil­i­ty of land use and sup­port pro­duc­tiv­i­ty and jobs growth. They seek to achieve this by pro­vid­ing areas that have a diver­si­ty of retail, busi­ness, office and accom­mo­da­tion uses to increase employ­ment oppor­tu­ni­ties in acces­si­ble loca­tions. The new zones also aim to pro­vide suit­able areas for indus­tri­al activ­i­ties and will sep­a­rate heavy indus­try from oth­er land uses to min­imise envi­ron­men­tal impacts. 

Busi­ness and Indus­tri­al zones have been replaced with five new employ­ment zones, to be called: 

  • E1 Local Centre
  • E2 Com­mer­cial Centre
  • E3 Pro­duc­tiv­i­ty Support
  • E4 Gen­er­al Indus­tri­al; and
  • E5 Heavy Industrial

Three addi­tion­al zones have also been cre­at­ed to accom­mo­date land uses in exist­ing busi­ness and indus­tri­al zones that are not pro­duc­tiv­i­ty related: 

  • MU1 Mixed Use
  • W4 Work­ing Water­front; and
  • SP4 Enter­prise

The amend­ments were made on 16 Decem­ber 2022 but the new zones will not take effect until 26 April 2023

A com­par­i­son table show­ing the exist­ing zones and the new zones can be found here

If you would like to repub­lish this arti­cle, it is gen­er­al­ly approved, but pri­or to doing so please con­tact the Mar­ket­ing team at marketing@​swaab.​com.​au. This arti­cle is not legal advice and the views and com­ments are of a gen­er­al nature only. This arti­cle is not to be relied upon in sub­sti­tu­tion for detailed legal advice.

Publications

Putting the West­pac Work­ing From Home Case in Perspective

Can employ­ees real­ly work from home if they want to? In a recent Fair Work case an employ­ee won the right to…

The risk of builder insol­ven­cy mid way through a con­struc­tion project is real (and will prob­a­bly be expensive)

Intro­duc­tionThis arti­cle pro­vides guid­ance to those under­tak­ing con­struc­tion works and iden­ti­fies a num­ber of con­tract pro­vi­sions which, if includ­ed in the…

Cross-Com­pa­ny Secu­ri­ty and Liq­uida­tor Chal­lenges: Full Fed­er­al Court Restores Cer­tain­ty in CEG Direct Secu­ri­ties v Coop­er [2025] FCAFC 47

A sig­nif­i­cant deci­sion from the Full Fed­er­al Court has clar­i­fied the lim­its of liq­uida­tors’ pow­ers to unwind cross-com­pa­ny secu­ri­ty grant­ed…

In the News

What the West­pac flex­i­ble work rul­ing real­ly means for employers

Michael Byrnes’ arti­cle ​“What the West­pac flex­i­ble work rul­ing real­ly means for employ­ers”, was pub­lished on HRM Online on 2…

Michael Byrnes dis­cuss­es the West­pac WFH case on 2SM with Tim Webster

Michael Byrnes appeared on Break­fast with Tim Web­ster on 2SM on 27 Octo­ber 2025 to dis­cuss the West­pac Work from…

Michael Byrnes is quot­ed in the arti­cle, What hap­pens when an employ­ee runs out of sick leave?”, pub­lished in HRM Online on 21 Octo­ber 2025

Michael Byrnes is quot­ed in the arti­cle, ​“What hap­pens when an employ­ee runs out of sick leave?”, pub­lished in HRM…

Sign up for our Newsletter

*Mandatory information