In Brief

An impor­tant new devel­op­ment for trade mark pro­tec­tion in New Zealand comes into effect on 1 Decem­ber 2012. We look at what this means for busi­ness­es seek­ing brand pro­tec­tion in New Zealand.


In an impor­tant new devel­op­ment for Aus­tralian busi­ness­es seek­ing reg­is­tered trade mark pro­tec­tion for their brands in New Zealand, the Madrid Pro­to­col and the Sin­ga­pore Treaty will enter into force in New Zealand on 10 Decem­ber 2012. Most of Aus­trali­a’s major trad­ing part­ners are already mem­bers of this system.

This means that Aus­tralian trade mark own­ers will be able to apply for trade mark reg­is­tra­tion in New Zealand more eas­i­ly, and more cheap­ly. It means that an appli­ca­tion can be made in New Zealand (and all oth­er Madrid Pro­to­col coun­tries includ­ing Europe and the USA) using a sin­gle appli­ca­tion through the World Intel­lec­tu­al Prop­er­ty Office, with­out the need to engage trade mark lawyers or agents in New Zealand.

Com­men­tary on the change in New Zealand sug­gests that this moves New Zealand and Aus­tralia clos­er togeth­er with a view to cre­ate a sin­gle eco­nom­ic mar­ket between the two coun­tries. It also aligns with the New Zealand and Aus­tralian Gov­ern­ments’ announce­ment in 2011 for the imple­men­ta­tion of a sim­pli­fied fil­ing and exam­i­na­tion process for patent appli­ca­tions filed in both coun­tries by June 2014. These changes are already tak­ing effect in Aus­tralia with the advent of the Rais­ing the Bar’ leg­is­la­tion, which comes into effect in its entire­ty in April 2013.

Even if New Zealand is not a sig­nif­i­cant mar­ket for your goods or ser­vices, with these changes, you may want to recon­sid­er whether it is com­mer­cial­ly sen­si­ble to take steps to extend pro­tec­tion in New Zealand.

For fur­ther infor­ma­tion, please con­tact us.

Co-authored by M Hall.

If you would like to repub­lish this arti­cle, it is gen­er­al­ly approved, but pri­or to doing so please con­tact the Mar­ket­ing team at marketing@​swaab.​com.​au. This arti­cle is not legal advice and the views and com­ments are of a gen­er­al nature only. This arti­cle is not to be relied upon in sub­sti­tu­tion for detailed legal advice.

Publications

10 year long stop on build­ing defect claims rein­forced for con­tri­bu­tion claims

The recent deci­sion in For­tius Broad­way No 1 Pty Ltd V ACN 103 211 141 Pty Ltd (for­mer­ly known as Wat­pac Con­struc­tion…

A High­er Evi­den­tiary Bur­den for Work Orders: The Prac­ti­cal Impli­ca­tions of The Own­ers – Stra­ta Plan No 102171 v Ceerose Pty Ltd [2025] NSW­CATCD 137

The deci­sion in The Own­ers – Stra­ta Plan No 102171 v Ceerose Pty Ltd; Zone Q Mil­sons Point Devel­op­ment Pty Ltd v Ceerose…

Impor­tant Work­place Rela­tions Changes Effec­tive 1 July 2026

Employ­ers and employ­ees alike should be aware of impor­tant changes in the work­place rela­tions are­na, effec­tive 1 July 2026. From that date:the…

In the News

Roger Corn­forth Retires Fol­low­ing 45 Years of Dis­tin­guished Legal Practice

Roger’s career has been defined by trust­ed rela­tion­ships, prac­ti­cal advice and an unwa­ver­ing com­mit­ment to his clients. Begin­ning his legal…

Protest group los­es appeal to obtain gov­ern­ment documents

The cas­es — Mudgee Region Health Alliance v Min­is­ter for Finance, Domes­tic Man­u­fac­tur­ing and Gov­ern­ment Pro­cure­ment and Nat­ur­al Resources [2026] NSW­CATAD…

Michael Byrnes is quot­ed in the arti­cle, The PM v work­place stan­dards”, pub­lished in HR Leader on 8 July 2026

Michael Byrnes is quot­ed in the arti­cle, ​“The PM v work­place stan­dards”, pub­lished in HR Leader on 8 July 2026To read the…

Sign up for our Newsletter

*Mandatory information