In Brief

An impor­tant new devel­op­ment for trade mark pro­tec­tion in New Zealand comes into effect on 1 Decem­ber 2012. We look at what this means for busi­ness­es seek­ing brand pro­tec­tion in New Zealand.


In an impor­tant new devel­op­ment for Aus­tralian busi­ness­es seek­ing reg­is­tered trade mark pro­tec­tion for their brands in New Zealand, the Madrid Pro­to­col and the Sin­ga­pore Treaty will enter into force in New Zealand on 10 Decem­ber 2012. Most of Aus­trali­a’s major trad­ing part­ners are already mem­bers of this system.

This means that Aus­tralian trade mark own­ers will be able to apply for trade mark reg­is­tra­tion in New Zealand more eas­i­ly, and more cheap­ly. It means that an appli­ca­tion can be made in New Zealand (and all oth­er Madrid Pro­to­col coun­tries includ­ing Europe and the USA) using a sin­gle appli­ca­tion through the World Intel­lec­tu­al Prop­er­ty Office, with­out the need to engage trade mark lawyers or agents in New Zealand.

Com­men­tary on the change in New Zealand sug­gests that this moves New Zealand and Aus­tralia clos­er togeth­er with a view to cre­ate a sin­gle eco­nom­ic mar­ket between the two coun­tries. It also aligns with the New Zealand and Aus­tralian Gov­ern­ments’ announce­ment in 2011 for the imple­men­ta­tion of a sim­pli­fied fil­ing and exam­i­na­tion process for patent appli­ca­tions filed in both coun­tries by June 2014. These changes are already tak­ing effect in Aus­tralia with the advent of the Rais­ing the Bar’ leg­is­la­tion, which comes into effect in its entire­ty in April 2013.

Even if New Zealand is not a sig­nif­i­cant mar­ket for your goods or ser­vices, with these changes, you may want to recon­sid­er whether it is com­mer­cial­ly sen­si­ble to take steps to extend pro­tec­tion in New Zealand.

For fur­ther infor­ma­tion, please con­tact us.

Co-authored by M Hall.

If you would like to repub­lish this arti­cle, it is gen­er­al­ly approved, but pri­or to doing so please con­tact the Mar­ket­ing team at marketing@​swaab.​com.​au. This arti­cle is not legal advice and the views and com­ments are of a gen­er­al nature only. This arti­cle is not to be relied upon in sub­sti­tu­tion for detailed legal advice.

Publications

Strata Plan 92183 v Samdora Pty Ltd [2026] NSWSC 406 | 'Substantive Control' over Works & s37 of the DB&P Act

In this case, the plain­tiff (Stra­ta Plan 92183) brought pro­ceed­ings alleg­ing defec­tive res­i­den­tial build­ing work in rela­tion to 9 town hous­es…

Dis­clo­sure: When is enough enough?

Dis­clo­sure, the fam­i­ly law equiv­a­lent of dis­cov­ery in oth­er kinds of civ­il pro­ceed­ings, is a foun­da­tion­al part of fam­i­ly law matters. The Fed­er­al…

When Judges return to prac­tice: a clos­er look at the deci­sion in Tan­it & Tanit

In the Fed­er­al Cir­cuit and Fam­i­ly Court of Aus­tralia, being a Fed­er­al Court, the com­pul­so­ry retire­ment age of Judges is 70 years…

In the News

Michael Byrnes is quot­ed in the arti­cle, Kyle Sandi­lands to get $12m in set­tle­ment with ARN after court stoush”, pub­lished in The Aus­tralian on 17 June 2026

Michael Byrnes is quot­ed in the arti­cle, ​“Kyle Sandi­lands to get $12m in set­tle­ment with ARN after court stoush”, pub­lished…

Michael Byrnes appeared on McK­night Tonight with Robert McK­night on 17 June 2026 to dis­cuss the set­tle­ment of the pro­ceed­ings brought by Kyle Sandi­lands against ARN (from 22:45 to 41:25)

Michael Byrnes appeared on McK­night Tonight with Robert McK­night on 17 June 2026 to dis­cuss the set­tle­ment of the pro­ceed­ings…

Michael Byrnes is quot­ed in the arti­cle, “ Text­book exam­ple’: Work­place lawyer reveals who win­ners’ are in Kyle Sandi­lands’ set­tle­ment with for­mer employ­er ARN”, pub­lished on the Sky News web­site on 17 June 2026

Michael Byrnes is quot­ed in the arti­cle, “ ​‘Text­book exam­ple’: Work­place lawyer reveals who ​‘win­ners’ are in Kyle Sandi­lands’ set­tle­ment with…

Sign up for our Newsletter

*Mandatory information