In Brief

An impor­tant new devel­op­ment for trade mark pro­tec­tion in New Zealand comes into effect on 1 Decem­ber 2012. We look at what this means for busi­ness­es seek­ing brand pro­tec­tion in New Zealand.


In an impor­tant new devel­op­ment for Aus­tralian busi­ness­es seek­ing reg­is­tered trade mark pro­tec­tion for their brands in New Zealand, the Madrid Pro­to­col and the Sin­ga­pore Treaty will enter into force in New Zealand on 10 Decem­ber 2012. Most of Aus­trali­a’s major trad­ing part­ners are already mem­bers of this system.

This means that Aus­tralian trade mark own­ers will be able to apply for trade mark reg­is­tra­tion in New Zealand more eas­i­ly, and more cheap­ly. It means that an appli­ca­tion can be made in New Zealand (and all oth­er Madrid Pro­to­col coun­tries includ­ing Europe and the USA) using a sin­gle appli­ca­tion through the World Intel­lec­tu­al Prop­er­ty Office, with­out the need to engage trade mark lawyers or agents in New Zealand.

Com­men­tary on the change in New Zealand sug­gests that this moves New Zealand and Aus­tralia clos­er togeth­er with a view to cre­ate a sin­gle eco­nom­ic mar­ket between the two coun­tries. It also aligns with the New Zealand and Aus­tralian Gov­ern­ments’ announce­ment in 2011 for the imple­men­ta­tion of a sim­pli­fied fil­ing and exam­i­na­tion process for patent appli­ca­tions filed in both coun­tries by June 2014. These changes are already tak­ing effect in Aus­tralia with the advent of the Rais­ing the Bar’ leg­is­la­tion, which comes into effect in its entire­ty in April 2013.

Even if New Zealand is not a sig­nif­i­cant mar­ket for your goods or ser­vices, with these changes, you may want to recon­sid­er whether it is com­mer­cial­ly sen­si­ble to take steps to extend pro­tec­tion in New Zealand.

For fur­ther infor­ma­tion, please con­tact us.

Co-authored by M Hall.

If you would like to repub­lish this arti­cle, it is gen­er­al­ly approved, but pri­or to doing so please con­tact the Mar­ket­ing team at marketing@​swaab.​com.​au. This arti­cle is not legal advice and the views and com­ments are of a gen­er­al nature only. This arti­cle is not to be relied upon in sub­sti­tu­tion for detailed legal advice.

Publications

The Expand­ing Scope of Devel­op­er and Builder Lia­bil­i­ty: Own­ers Stra­ta Plan No 66375 v King [2018] NSW­CA 170

The New South Wales Court of Appeal’s deci­sion in The Own­ers Stra­ta Plan No 66375 v King remains one of the…

Pay­day for liquidators!

Orders sought, orders made, liq­uida­tors ful­ly paidIn the recent mat­ter of Shield Resources Pty Ltd (in liq) and Shield Hold­ings South Aus­tralia…

The extend­ed 6 year lim­i­ta­tion peri­od for SSMA sec­tion 106 stra­ta claims is not retrospective

In the recent deci­sion of John Goubran & Asso­ciates Pty Ltd ACN 070 974 819 v The Own­ers – Stra­ta Plan 5715…

In the News

Michael Byrnes appeared on McK­night Tonight with Robert McK­night on 12 May 2026 to dis­cuss the lat­est court doc­u­ments in the sep­a­rate legal pro­ceed­ings com­menced by Kyle Sandi­lands and Jack­ie O’ Hen­der­son against ARN

Michael Byrnes appeared on McK­night Tonight with Robert McK­night on 12 May 2026 to dis­cuss the lat­est court doc­u­ments in the…

Michael Byrnes appeared on the Game Chang­ers Radio pod­cast host­ed by Craig Bruce and Irene Hulme on 8 May 2026 to dis­cuss the lat­est devel­op­ments in the sep­a­rate legal pro­ceed­ings com­menced by Kyle Sandi­lands and Jack­ie O’ Hen­der­son against AR

Michael Byrnes appeared on the Game Chang­ers Radio pod­cast host­ed by Craig Bruce and Irene Hulme on 8 May 2026 to…

Michael Byrnes appeared on the Game Chang­ers Radio pod­cast host­ed by Craig Bruce and Irene Hulme on 30 April 2026 to dis­cuss the state of play in the sep­a­rate legal pro­ceed­ings com­menced by Kyle Sandi­lands and Jack­ie O’ Hen­der­son against ARN.

Michael Byrnes appeared on the Game Chang­ers Radio pod­cast host­ed by Craig Bruce and Irene Hulme on 30 April 202…

Sign up for our Newsletter

*Mandatory information