In Brief

An impor­tant new devel­op­ment for trade mark pro­tec­tion in New Zealand comes into effect on 1 Decem­ber 2012. We look at what this means for busi­ness­es seek­ing brand pro­tec­tion in New Zealand.


In an impor­tant new devel­op­ment for Aus­tralian busi­ness­es seek­ing reg­is­tered trade mark pro­tec­tion for their brands in New Zealand, the Madrid Pro­to­col and the Sin­ga­pore Treaty will enter into force in New Zealand on 10 Decem­ber 2012. Most of Aus­trali­a’s major trad­ing part­ners are already mem­bers of this system.

This means that Aus­tralian trade mark own­ers will be able to apply for trade mark reg­is­tra­tion in New Zealand more eas­i­ly, and more cheap­ly. It means that an appli­ca­tion can be made in New Zealand (and all oth­er Madrid Pro­to­col coun­tries includ­ing Europe and the USA) using a sin­gle appli­ca­tion through the World Intel­lec­tu­al Prop­er­ty Office, with­out the need to engage trade mark lawyers or agents in New Zealand.

Com­men­tary on the change in New Zealand sug­gests that this moves New Zealand and Aus­tralia clos­er togeth­er with a view to cre­ate a sin­gle eco­nom­ic mar­ket between the two coun­tries. It also aligns with the New Zealand and Aus­tralian Gov­ern­ments’ announce­ment in 2011 for the imple­men­ta­tion of a sim­pli­fied fil­ing and exam­i­na­tion process for patent appli­ca­tions filed in both coun­tries by June 2014. These changes are already tak­ing effect in Aus­tralia with the advent of the Rais­ing the Bar’ leg­is­la­tion, which comes into effect in its entire­ty in April 2013.

Even if New Zealand is not a sig­nif­i­cant mar­ket for your goods or ser­vices, with these changes, you may want to recon­sid­er whether it is com­mer­cial­ly sen­si­ble to take steps to extend pro­tec­tion in New Zealand.

For fur­ther infor­ma­tion, please con­tact us.

Co-authored by M Hall.

If you would like to repub­lish this arti­cle, it is gen­er­al­ly approved, but pri­or to doing so please con­tact the Mar­ket­ing team at marketing@​swaab.​com.​au. This arti­cle is not legal advice and the views and com­ments are of a gen­er­al nature only. This arti­cle is not to be relied upon in sub­sti­tu­tion for detailed legal advice.

Publications

Match­ing Par­ent­ing Orders to Risk: Craft­ing orders to prop­er­ly address the dan­gers in a fam­i­ly law matter

The focus of any par­ent­ing mat­ter being dealt with in the Fed­er­al Cir­cuit and Fam­i­ly Court of Aus­tralia is what…

Amend­ments to NCC 2022 com­menc­ing on 1 May 2025

Back­groundThe Aus­tralian Build­ing Codes Board (ABCB), a joint ini­tia­tive of the Com­mon­wealth and state and ter­ri­to­ry gov­ern­ments togeth­er with the build­ing…

Choose Your Own Respon­dent in Gen­er­al Pro­tec­tions Dis­missal Disputes

Usu­al­ly when one par­ty is tak­ing legal pro­ceed­ings against anoth­er the respon­dent enti­ty needs to be care­ful­ly iden­ti­fied. It can…

In the News

Press Release | New Part­ner Appoint­ment — Mark Glynn

With over two decades in the indus­try, Mark is a recog­nised front-end con­struc­tion lawyer spe­cial­ist with­in the build­ing and con­struc­tion indus­try. Mark…

Press Release | New Asso­ciate Appoint­ment — Hugo Mahony

“As we con­tin­ue to expand in line with our strate­gic vision, Hugo’s deep knowl­edge and expe­ri­ence in Com­mer­cial, Cor­po­rate, IP…

Michael Byrnes is quot­ed in the arti­cle, Police and Safe­Work are inves­ti­gat­ing MAFS, but the show keeps win­ning the rat­ings race”, pub­lished on ABC News on 6 April 2025

Michael Byrnes is quot­ed in the arti­cle, ​“Police and Safe­Work are inves­ti­gat­ing MAFS, but the show keeps win­ning the rat­ings…

Sign up for our Newsletter

*Mandatory information