Cham­bers and Part­ners, the world’s lead­ing legal rank­ings organ­i­sa­tion and defin­i­tive guide to pro­fes­sion­al ser­vices providers across key mar­kets world­wide, has once again named Mer­i­tas an Elite Glob­al Legal Net­work, its high­est designation.

Mer­i­tas has been named an Elite Glob­al Legal Net­work by Cham­bers, a recog­ni­tion based on inde­pen­dent, in‑depth research across more than 200 juris­dic­tions world­wide. Cham­bers is wide­ly regard­ed as the lead­ing author­i­ty on the legal pro­fes­sion, assess­ing law firms and net­works on the qual­i­ties clients val­ue most, includ­ing tech­ni­cal exper­tise, client ser­vice, and com­mer­cial insight.

Mer­i­tas mem­ber­ship gives clients access to a care­ful­ly vet­ted net­work of 172 inde­pen­dent, full‑service law firms around the world. Each mem­ber meets rig­or­ous qual­i­ty stan­dards, enabling seam­less cross‑border advice deliv­ered by trust­ed local experts who col­lab­o­rate close­ly to sup­port inter­na­tion­al legal matters.

Swaab has been a proud mem­ber of Mer­i­tas since 2009, join­ing the net­work to ensure our clients ben­e­fit from strong glob­al con­nec­tions with­out com­pro­mis­ing on per­son­alised, partner‑led ser­vice. This recog­ni­tion con­firms the con­sis­ten­cy, qual­i­ty, and val­ues shared across the Mer­i­tas net­work and rein­forces our com­mit­ment to deliv­er­ing out­stand­ing out­comes wher­ev­er our clients do business.

To read the Mer­i­tas announce­ment click here

If you would like to repub­lish this arti­cle, it is gen­er­al­ly approved, but pri­or to doing so please con­tact the Mar­ket­ing team at marketing@​swaab.​com.​au. This arti­cle is not legal advice and the views and com­ments are of a gen­er­al nature only. This arti­cle is not to be relied upon in sub­sti­tu­tion for detailed legal advice.

Publications

10 year long stop on build­ing defect claims rein­forced for con­tri­bu­tion claims

The recent deci­sion in For­tius Broad­way No 1 Pty Ltd V ACN 103 211 141 Pty Ltd (for­mer­ly known as Wat­pac Con­struc­tion…

A High­er Evi­den­tiary Bur­den for Work Orders: The Prac­ti­cal Impli­ca­tions of The Own­ers – Stra­ta Plan No 102171 v Ceerose Pty Ltd [2025] NSW­CATCD 137

The deci­sion in The Own­ers – Stra­ta Plan No 102171 v Ceerose Pty Ltd; Zone Q Mil­sons Point Devel­op­ment Pty Ltd v Ceerose…

Impor­tant Work­place Rela­tions Changes Effec­tive 1 July 2026

Employ­ers and employ­ees alike should be aware of impor­tant changes in the work­place rela­tions are­na, effec­tive 1 July 2026. From that date:the…

In the News

Roger Corn­forth Retires Fol­low­ing 45 Years of Dis­tin­guished Legal Practice

Roger’s career has been defined by trust­ed rela­tion­ships, prac­ti­cal advice and an unwa­ver­ing com­mit­ment to his clients. Begin­ning his legal…

Protest group los­es appeal to obtain gov­ern­ment documents

The cas­es — Mudgee Region Health Alliance v Min­is­ter for Finance, Domes­tic Man­u­fac­tur­ing and Gov­ern­ment Pro­cure­ment and Nat­ur­al Resources [2026] NSW­CATAD…

Michael Byrnes is quot­ed in the arti­cle, The PM v work­place stan­dards”, pub­lished in HR Leader on 8 July 2026

Michael Byrnes is quot­ed in the arti­cle, ​“The PM v work­place stan­dards”, pub­lished in HR Leader on 8 July 2026To read the…

Sign up for our Newsletter

*Mandatory information