Baby Priya’s Bill amends the Fair Work Act to pro­tect employ­er-fund­ed paid parental leave for par­ents after child loss, still­birth, or adoption.

Baby Priya’s Bill (Bill’) passed par­lia­ment on 3 Novem­ber 2025 after par­ents of 42-day old Priya endured a loss no par­ent should have to suffer. 

Fol­low­ing the trag­ic pass­ing of her daugh­ter, the moth­er of Priya found her­self in a posi­tion where her employ­er can­celled her pre-planned paid parental leave as a result of her daugh­ter’s death.

Pri­or to the Bill being intro­duced, par­ents who expe­ri­enced the still­birth or ear­ly pass­ing of their babies were not afford­ed with legal pro­tec­tions to utilise employ­er-fund­ed paid parental leave as a time to deal with the loss of their child. 

The Fair Work Act 2009 (Cth) (Act) will now be amend­ed to pro­vide employ­ees suf­fer­ing the loss of their child with this pro­tec­tion with­out need­ing to rely on oth­er enti­tle­ments such as annu­al leave or com­pas­sion­ate leave. It should be not­ed that this applies only in cir­cum­stances where the employ­er already has an applic­a­ble scheme in place – this amend­ment does not apply to employ­ers who do not have a paid parental leave scheme or to employ­ees who are not eli­gi­ble for paid parental leave under an employ­er’s paid parental leave scheme. 

Employ­ers in Aus­tralia will not be able to uni­lat­er­al­ly can­cel an employ­ee’s enti­tle­ment of employ­er-fund­ed paid parental leave in cir­cum­stances where the employ­ee’s child is still­born or dies, mak­ing it con­sis­tent with the leg­isla­tive pro­vi­sions con­cern­ing gov­ern­ment-fund­ed paid parental leave. 

An employ­ee’s enti­tle­ment to employ­er-fund­ed paid parental leave will be pre­served in the above­men­tioned cir­cum­stances unless any terms and con­di­tions gov­ern­ing the employ­ment rela­tion­ship (by way of con­tract, poli­cies, indus­tri­al instru­ments, etc.):

  1. express­ly allow the employ­er to refuse or can­cel the paid parental leave in cir­cum­stances of a still­birth or death of an employ­ee’s child; or
  2. express­ly state that the enti­tle­ment is not pro­vid­ed to employ­ees who have expe­ri­enced the still­birth or death of a child; or
  3. pro­vide the employ­ee with anoth­er form of leave that is express­ly avail­able in the event of the still­birth or death of the employ­ee’s child.

The new amend­ments also extend this pro­tec­tion to employ­ees deal­ing with sur­ro­ga­cy and adop­tion arrange­ments and will con­sti­tute a new work­place right for the pur­pose of sec­tion 341 of the Act, deal­ing with gen­er­al pro­tec­tion provisions. 

Fur­ther, employ­ees who have unfor­tu­nate­ly suf­fered from the still­birth or death of a child will only be able to rely on the new pro­vi­sions of the Act after they are imple­ment­ed (pro­vid­ed the death of the child occurs after the imple­men­ta­tion of the new pro­vi­sions), rather than ret­ro­spec­tive­ly, with lim­it­ed exceptions. 

The new pro­vi­sions will fall under the def­i­n­i­tion of a civ­il rem­e­dy pro­vi­sion under the Act, and any employ­er who is found to unlaw­ful­ly breach the new pro­vi­sions may be sub­ject to civ­il rem­e­dy penalties.

If you would like to repub­lish this arti­cle, it is gen­er­al­ly approved, but pri­or to doing so please con­tact the Mar­ket­ing team at marketing@​swaab.​com.​au. This arti­cle is not legal advice and the views and com­ments are of a gen­er­al nature only. This arti­cle is not to be relied upon in sub­sti­tu­tion for detailed legal advice.

Publications

A High­er Evi­den­tiary Bur­den for Work Orders: The Prac­ti­cal Impli­ca­tions of The Own­ers – Stra­ta Plan No 102171 v Ceerose Pty Ltd [2025] NSW­CATCD 137

The deci­sion in The Own­ers – Stra­ta Plan No 102171 v Ceerose Pty Ltd; Zone Q Mil­sons Point Devel­op­ment Pty Ltd v Ceerose…

Impor­tant Work­place Rela­tions Changes Effec­tive 1 July 2026

Employ­ers and employ­ees alike should be aware of impor­tant changes in the work­place rela­tions are­na, effec­tive 1 July 2026. From that date:the…

Strata Plan 92183 v Samdora Pty Ltd [2026] NSWSC 406 | 'Substantive Control' over Works & s37 of the DB&P Act

In this case, the plain­tiff (Stra­ta Plan 92183) brought pro­ceed­ings alleg­ing defec­tive res­i­den­tial build­ing work in rela­tion to 9 town hous­es…

In the News

Protest group los­es appeal to obtain gov­ern­ment documents

The cas­es — Mudgee Region Health Alliance v Min­is­ter for Finance, Domes­tic Man­u­fac­tur­ing and Gov­ern­ment Pro­cure­ment and Nat­ur­al Resources [2026] NSW­CATAD…

Michael Byrnes is quot­ed in the arti­cle, The PM v work­place stan­dards”, pub­lished in HR Leader on 8 July 2026

Michael Byrnes is quot­ed in the arti­cle, ​“The PM v work­place stan­dards”, pub­lished in HR Leader on 8 July 2026To read the…

Michael Byrnes is quot­ed in the arti­cle, When does a com­pet­i­tive cul­ture become a legal risk?”, pub­lished in AHRI AM on 6 July 2026

Michael Byrnes is quot­ed in the arti­cle, ​“When does a com­pet­i­tive cul­ture become a legal risk?”, pub­lished in AHRI AM on 6 July…

Sign up for our Newsletter

*Mandatory information