Under the new stra­ta law reforms com­menc­ing 1 July 2025 (the Stra­ta Schemes Leg­is­la­tion Amend­ment Act 2025 (No. 14) NSWa key change that will impact own­ers cor­po­ra­tions and asso­ci­a­tions[1] are the unfair con­tract terms (UCT) pro­vi­sions.

In line with Aus­tralian Con­sumer Law, UCT will now be banned and will apply to:

  • con­tracts for a sup­ply of goods or ser­vices to an own­ers cor­po­ra­tion or asso­ci­a­tion; and
  • con­tracts for a sale or grant of an inter­est in land to an own­ers cor­po­ra­tion or association.

The UCT changes do not apply to exist­ing con­tracts and will only apply to:

  • con­tracts entered into after the new pro­vi­sions come into effect;
  • renewed con­tracts but only in rela­tion to con­duct occur­ring after the renew­al; and
  • new or var­ied terms insert­ed into exist­ing con­tracts but only in rela­tion to con­duct occur­ring after the vari­a­tion or insertion.

Read more on this at the Guide to 2025 stra­ta law changes | NSW Gov­ern­ment and Unfair con­tract terms in out­dat­ed stan­dard form con­tracts could cost you a pos­si­ble fine of $50 mil­lion (Com­pa­nies) or $2.5 mil­lion (Indi­vid­u­als)

Under sec­tion 24 of the Aus­tralian Con­sumer Law, UCT means terms that:

  • would cause a sig­nif­i­cant imbal­ance in the par­ties’ rights and oblig­a­tions under the contract;
  • is not rea­son­ably nec­es­sary in order to pro­tect the legit­i­mate inter­ests of the par­ty who would be advan­taged by the term; and
  • would cause detri­ment (whether finan­cial or oth­er­wise) to a par­ty if it were to be applied or relied on.

In order to deter­mine whether a term is unfair, the Court must take into account the following:

  • the extent to which the term is trans­par­ent i.e. expressed in rea­son­ably plain lan­guage, leg­i­ble, pre­sent­ed clear­ly and read­i­ly avail­able to any par­ty affect­ed by the term;
  • the con­tract as a whole.

Some exam­ples of unfair con­tract terms:

  • a term that per­mits one par­ty but not the oth­er par­ty to avoid or lim­it performance;
  • a term that per­mits one par­ty but not the oth­er par­ty to ter­mi­nate the contract;
  • a term that penalis­es one par­ty but not the oth­er par­ty for a breach or ter­mi­na­tion of the contract;
  • a term that per­mits one par­ty but not the oth­er par­ty to vary the terms of the contract.

Typ­i­cal exam­ples of the types of agree­ments entered by own­ers cor­po­ra­tions or asso­ci­a­tions which will be impact­ed by UCT from 1 July 2025 include:

  • Build­ing Management/​Facilities Ser­vices Agreements
  • Concierge/​Cleaning Agreements
  • Ser­vices Agreements
  • Stra­ta Man­age­ment Agency Agreements
  • Build­ing Contract/​Consultancy Agreements
  • Con­tracts for sale or grant of an inter­est in land

Swaab has an expe­ri­enced team of lawyers spe­cialised in stra­ta law to assist with updat­ing agree­ments and con­tracts for the sup­ply of goods and ser­vices and/​or con­tracts for sale of or grant­i­ng of an inter­est in land to be entered after 1 July 2025

[1] asso­ci­a­tion means a com­mu­ni­ty asso­ci­a­tion, precinct asso­ci­a­tion or neigh­bour­hood asso­ci­a­tion under the Com­mu­ni­ty Land Man­age­ment Act 2021 (NSW)

If you would like to repub­lish this arti­cle, it is gen­er­al­ly approved, but pri­or to doing so please con­tact the Mar­ket­ing team at marketing@​swaab.​com.​au. This arti­cle is not legal advice and the views and com­ments are of a gen­er­al nature only. This arti­cle is not to be relied upon in sub­sti­tu­tion for detailed legal advice.

Publications

Assess­ing Scope 3 Emis­sions: An analy­sis of the impli­ca­tions of Den­man Aberdeen Muswell­brook Scone Healthy Envi­ron­ment Group Inc v MACH Ener­gy Aus­tralia Pty Ltd [2025] NSW­CA 163 (the Mount Pleas­ant decision)

Intro­duc­tionOn July 24, 2025, the New South Wales Court of Appeal (NSW­CA) deliv­ered a land­mark rul­ing in Den­man Aberdeen Muswell­brook Scone…

Work­place Rela­tion­ships: The Legal Posi­tion (Cold­play Con­cert Edition)

The recent sto­ry of col­leagues (a Chief Exec­u­tive Offi­cer and Chief Peo­ple Offi­cer (CPO)) whose appar­ent rela­tion­ship was cap­tured on…

Dis­missal for Dissent?

The recent unfair dis­missal deci­sion of the Fair Work Com­mis­sion, Shaun Turn­er v Dare­bin City Coun­cil [2025] FWC 1763, in which Deputy…

In the News

Michael Byrnes is quot­ed in the arti­cle, Employ­ee award­ed $305k in record sex­u­al harass­ment pay­out”, pub­lished in HRM Online on 12 August 2025

Michael Byrnes is quot­ed in the arti­cle, ​“Employ­ee award­ed $305k in record sex­u­al harass­ment pay­out”, pub­lished in HRM Online on…

Michael Byrnes appeared on Mon­ey News with Evan Lucas on 2GB on 4 August 2025 to dis­cuss the pro­posed Vic­to­ri­an state gov­ern­ment work from home laws

Michael Byrnes appeared on Mon­ey News with Evan Lucas on 2GB on 4 August 2025 to dis­cuss the pro­posed Vic­to­ri­an state gov­ern­ment…

Julie Briscoe attend­ed an event last night host­ed by NSW Gov­er­nor Mar­garet Bea­z­ley, cel­e­brat­ing Tour de Cure’s sup­port for world-class can­cer research breakthroughs.

Her Excel­len­cy the Hon­ourable Mar­garet Bea­z­ley AC KC, Gov­er­nor of New South Wales, and patron of Tour de Cure, host­ed…

Sign up for our Newsletter

*Mandatory information