Under the new stra­ta law reforms com­menc­ing 1 July 2025 (the Stra­ta Schemes Leg­is­la­tion Amend­ment Act 2025 (No. 14) NSWa key change that will impact own­ers cor­po­ra­tions and asso­ci­a­tions[1] are the unfair con­tract terms (UCT) pro­vi­sions.

In line with Aus­tralian Con­sumer Law, UCT will now be banned and will apply to:

  • con­tracts for a sup­ply of goods or ser­vices to an own­ers cor­po­ra­tion or asso­ci­a­tion; and
  • con­tracts for a sale or grant of an inter­est in land to an own­ers cor­po­ra­tion or association.

The UCT changes do not apply to exist­ing con­tracts and will only apply to:

  • con­tracts entered into after the new pro­vi­sions come into effect;
  • renewed con­tracts but only in rela­tion to con­duct occur­ring after the renew­al; and
  • new or var­ied terms insert­ed into exist­ing con­tracts but only in rela­tion to con­duct occur­ring after the vari­a­tion or insertion.

Read more on this at the Guide to 2025 stra­ta law changes | NSW Gov­ern­ment and Unfair con­tract terms in out­dat­ed stan­dard form con­tracts could cost you a pos­si­ble fine of $50 mil­lion (Com­pa­nies) or $2.5 mil­lion (Indi­vid­u­als)

Under sec­tion 24 of the Aus­tralian Con­sumer Law, UCT means terms that:

  • would cause a sig­nif­i­cant imbal­ance in the par­ties’ rights and oblig­a­tions under the contract;
  • is not rea­son­ably nec­es­sary in order to pro­tect the legit­i­mate inter­ests of the par­ty who would be advan­taged by the term; and
  • would cause detri­ment (whether finan­cial or oth­er­wise) to a par­ty if it were to be applied or relied on.

In order to deter­mine whether a term is unfair, the Court must take into account the following:

  • the extent to which the term is trans­par­ent i.e. expressed in rea­son­ably plain lan­guage, leg­i­ble, pre­sent­ed clear­ly and read­i­ly avail­able to any par­ty affect­ed by the term;
  • the con­tract as a whole.

Some exam­ples of unfair con­tract terms:

  • a term that per­mits one par­ty but not the oth­er par­ty to avoid or lim­it performance;
  • a term that per­mits one par­ty but not the oth­er par­ty to ter­mi­nate the contract;
  • a term that penalis­es one par­ty but not the oth­er par­ty for a breach or ter­mi­na­tion of the contract;
  • a term that per­mits one par­ty but not the oth­er par­ty to vary the terms of the contract.

Typ­i­cal exam­ples of the types of agree­ments entered by own­ers cor­po­ra­tions or asso­ci­a­tions which will be impact­ed by UCT from 1 July 2025 include:

  • Build­ing Management/​Facilities Ser­vices Agreements
  • Concierge/​Cleaning Agreements
  • Ser­vices Agreements
  • Stra­ta Man­age­ment Agency Agreements
  • Build­ing Contract/​Consultancy Agreements
  • Con­tracts for sale or grant of an inter­est in land

Swaab has an expe­ri­enced team of lawyers spe­cialised in stra­ta law to assist with updat­ing agree­ments and con­tracts for the sup­ply of goods and ser­vices and/​or con­tracts for sale of or grant­i­ng of an inter­est in land to be entered after 1 July 2025

[1] asso­ci­a­tion means a com­mu­ni­ty asso­ci­a­tion, precinct asso­ci­a­tion or neigh­bour­hood asso­ci­a­tion under the Com­mu­ni­ty Land Man­age­ment Act 2021 (NSW)

If you would like to repub­lish this arti­cle, it is gen­er­al­ly approved, but pri­or to doing so please con­tact the Mar­ket­ing team at marketing@​swaab.​com.​au. This arti­cle is not legal advice and the views and com­ments are of a gen­er­al nature only. This arti­cle is not to be relied upon in sub­sti­tu­tion for detailed legal advice.

Publications

The risk of builder insol­ven­cy mid way through a con­struc­tion project is real (and will prob­a­bly be expensive)

Intro­duc­tionThis arti­cle pro­vides guid­ance to those under­tak­ing con­struc­tion works and iden­ti­fies a num­ber of con­tract pro­vi­sions which, if includ­ed in the…

Cross-Com­pa­ny Secu­ri­ty and Liq­uida­tor Chal­lenges: Full Fed­er­al Court Restores Cer­tain­ty in CEG Direct Secu­ri­ties v Coop­er [2025] FCAFC 47

A sig­nif­i­cant deci­sion from the Full Fed­er­al Court has clar­i­fied the lim­its of liq­uida­tors’ pow­ers to unwind cross-com­pa­ny secu­ri­ty grant­ed…

Copy­right and Gen­er­a­tive AI: what Aus­tralia can learn from the Meta and Anthrop­ic Rulings

In 2025, two U.S. court deci­sions, Kadrey v. Meta and Bartz v. Anthrop­ic, have pro­vid­ed the first real judi­cial answers…

In the News

Michael Byrnes is quot­ed in the arti­cle, The reac­tion to Char­lie Kirk’s assas­si­na­tion and its impli­ca­tions for employ­ment law”, pub­lished in Lawyers Week­ly on 26 Sep­tem­ber 2025

Michael Byrnes is quot­ed in the arti­cle, ​“The reac­tion to Char­lie Kirk’s assas­si­na­tion and its impli­ca­tions for employ­ment law”, pub­lished…

Sarah Heuv­el pro­vides insight into get­ting Rent Roll Trans­ac­tions Com­pli­ance Compliant

Sarah Heuv­el in an inter­view with Matthew Cial­lel­la of MC Broking & Advi­so­ry, dis­cuss rent roll trans­ac­tions and the three key…

Michael Byrnes appeared on Mon­ey News with Evan Lucas on 2GB on 8 Sep­tem­ber 2025 to dis­cuss the recent Fed­er­al Court deci­sion relat­ing to salary arrange­ments, set-off claus­es and award compliance

Michael Byrnes appeared on Mon­ey News with Evan Lucas on 2GB on 8 Sep­tem­ber 2025 to dis­cuss the recent Fed­er­al Court…

Sign up for our Newsletter

*Mandatory information