Under the new stra­ta law reforms com­menc­ing 1 July 2025 (the Stra­ta Schemes Leg­is­la­tion Amend­ment Act 2025 (No. 14) NSW) a key change that will impact own­ers cor­po­ra­tions and asso­ci­a­tions[1] are the unfair con­tract terms (UCT) pro­vi­sions.

In line with Aus­tralian Con­sumer Law, UCT will now be banned and will apply to:

  • con­tracts for a sup­ply of goods or ser­vices to an own­ers cor­po­ra­tion or asso­ci­a­tion; and
  • con­tracts for a sale or grant of an inter­est in land to an own­ers cor­po­ra­tion or association.

The UCT changes do not apply to exist­ing con­tracts and will only apply to:

  • con­tracts entered into after the new pro­vi­sions come into effect;
  • renewed con­tracts but only in rela­tion to con­duct occur­ring after the renew­al; and
  • new or var­ied terms insert­ed into exist­ing con­tracts but only in rela­tion to con­duct occur­ring after the vari­a­tion or insertion.

Read more on this at the Guide to 2025 stra­ta law changes | NSW Gov­ern­ment and Unfair con­tract terms in out­dat­ed stan­dard form con­tracts could cost you a pos­si­ble fine of $50 mil­lion (Com­pa­nies) or $2.5 mil­lion (Indi­vid­u­als). 

Under sec­tion 24 of the Aus­tralian Con­sumer Law, UCT means terms that:

  • would cause a sig­nif­i­cant imbal­ance in the par­ties’ rights and oblig­a­tions under the contract;
  • is not rea­son­ably nec­es­sary in order to pro­tect the legit­i­mate inter­ests of the par­ty who would be advan­taged by the term; and
  • would cause detri­ment (whether finan­cial or oth­er­wise) to a par­ty if it were to be applied or relied on.

In order to deter­mine whether a term is unfair, the Court must take into account the following:

  • the extent to which the term is trans­par­ent i.e. expressed in rea­son­ably plain lan­guage, leg­i­ble, pre­sent­ed clear­ly and read­i­ly avail­able to any par­ty affect­ed by the term;
  • the con­tract as a whole.

Some exam­ples of unfair con­tract terms:

  • a term that per­mits one par­ty but not the oth­er par­ty to avoid or lim­it performance;
  • a term that per­mits one par­ty but not the oth­er par­ty to ter­mi­nate the contract;
  • a term that penalis­es one par­ty but not the oth­er par­ty for a breach or ter­mi­na­tion of the contract;
  • a term that per­mits one par­ty but not the oth­er par­ty to vary the terms of the contract.

Typ­i­cal exam­ples of the types of agree­ments entered by own­ers cor­po­ra­tions or asso­ci­a­tions which will be impact­ed by UCT from 1 July 2025 include:

  • Build­ing Management/​Facilities Ser­vices Agreements
  • Concierge/​Cleaning Agreements
  • Ser­vices Agreements
  • Stra­ta Man­age­ment Agency Agreements
  • Build­ing Contract/​Consultancy Agreements
  • Con­tracts for sale or grant of an inter­est in land

Swaab has an expe­ri­enced team of lawyers spe­cialised in stra­ta law to assist with updat­ing agree­ments and con­tracts for the sup­ply of goods and ser­vices and/​or con­tracts for sale of or grant­i­ng of an inter­est in land to be entered after 1 July 2025. 

[1] asso­ci­a­tion means a com­mu­ni­ty asso­ci­a­tion, precinct asso­ci­a­tion or neigh­bour­hood asso­ci­a­tion under the Com­mu­ni­ty Land Man­age­ment Act 2021 (NSW)

If you would like to repub­lish this arti­cle, it is gen­er­al­ly approved, but pri­or to doing so please con­tact the Mar­ket­ing team at marketing@​swaab.​com.​au. This arti­cle is not legal advice and the views and com­ments are of a gen­er­al nature only. This arti­cle is not to be relied upon in sub­sti­tu­tion for detailed legal advice.

Publications

Per­son­al Lia­bil­i­ty for Build­ing Defects: The scope of sec­tion 37 of the Design and Build­ing Prac­ti­tion­ers Act 2020 (NSW)

NSW Supreme Court con­firms direc­tors and project man­agers can be per­son­al­ly liable under sec­tion 37 of the Design and Build­ing…

Pineap­ple on the Piz­za: Rea­son­able Direc­tion to Com­mit a Culi­nary Cul­tur­al Crime

The recent Fair Work Com­mis­sion (FWC) deci­sion in Mr Davide Tam­bu­rel­la v The Trustee For La Cos­ta Hos­pi­tal­i­ty Unit Trust [2026] FWC 4264…

‘Tis the Sea­son to Avoid Fol­ly: Work­place Christ­mas Par­ties (2026 Edition)

It’s that time of year. The ​‘Sil­ly Sea­son’. For many organ­i­sa­tions, the offi­cial employ­er Christ­mas par­ty is imminent.The start­ing point for…

In the News

Michael Byrnes is quot­ed in the arti­cle, ​“Sky­dance staff buy­out offer at Ten poten­tial­ly rais­es legal red flags”, pub­lished in Mum­brel­la on 6 Novem­ber 20

Could Sky­dance’s staff buy­out offer at Ten cre­ate legal risks or employ­ment law issues?Michael Byrnes is quot­ed in the arti­cle, ​“Sky­dance…

Michael Byrnes appeared on McK­night Tonight with Robert McK­night on 4 Novem­ber 2026 to dis­cuss the lat­est devel­op­ments in the Jack­ie ​‘O’ Hen­der­son v ARN case (from 3:42 to 18:30)

Analy­sis of the lat­est Fed­er­al Court devel­op­ments in Jack­ie O’s case against ARN, includ­ing priv­i­lege rul­ings, the board memo and…

Michael Byrnes is quot­ed in the arti­cle, ​“Mel­bourne Cup – a giant red flag, or a bit of fun?”, pub­lished in HR Leader on 3 Novem­ber 2026

Is the Mel­bourne Cup a Work­place Cul­ture Risk? HR Guid­ance on Inclu­sion, Alco­hol and Employ­ee Wellbeing.Michael Byrnes is quot­ed in the arti­cle…

Sign up for our Newsletter

*Mandatory information