In Brief

Changes to Aus­trali­a’s intel­lec­tu­al prop­er­ty régime will come into full effect on 15 April 2013. These changes affect many of the process­es and pro­ce­dures for patent, design and trade mark protection.

For trade mark own­ers, this will mean that the peri­od with­in which a third par­ty can oppose an accept­ed appli­ca­tion from being reg­is­tered will be reduced from 3 months to 2 months. The change also applies to oppo­si­tion to removal of a trade mark for non-use. This change will apply to any trade marks that are adver­tised as accept­ed on or after 15 April 2013, or any appli­ca­tions for removal of a trade mark adver­tised on or after 15 April 2013. 

This short­er time­frame means that trade mark own­ers need to review any mar­ket mon­i­tor­ing that they cur­rent­ly under­take, to ensure that their process­es allow for suf­fi­cient time to meet this sig­nif­i­cant­ly short­er dead­line. This change makes it even more impor­tant to act quick­ly (and to obtain appro­pri­ate spe­cial­ist advice) if there is any con­cern with a com­pet­ing appli­ca­tion that has been accept­ed, or if an appli­ca­tion for removal of a reg­is­tered trade mark is made.

If you would like fur­ther infor­ma­tion about this, or any of the oth­er changes, or would like to dis­cuss imple­ment­ing a trade mark mon­i­tor­ing pro­gram, please con­tact Swaab Attorneys.

Co-authored by M Hall.

If you would like to repub­lish this arti­cle, it is gen­er­al­ly approved, but pri­or to doing so please con­tact the Mar­ket­ing team at marketing@​swaab.​com.​au. This arti­cle is not legal advice and the views and com­ments are of a gen­er­al nature only. This arti­cle is not to be relied upon in sub­sti­tu­tion for detailed legal advice.

Publications

No Appor­tion­ment for Sec­tion 37 DBP Act Claims even where the alleged con­cur­rent wrong­do­er is not a sub­con­trac­tor of the builder:

Kapi­la v Mon­u­ment Build­ing Group Pty Ltd [2025] NSWSC 1306 con­firms that builders and nom­i­nat­ed super­vi­sors can be held ful­ly liable…

Tem­po­rary Dis­con­for­mi­ty in Build­ing Defects: Myth, Not Law

The ​“tem­po­rary dis­con­for­mi­ty” argu­ment in con­struc­tion dis­putes sug­gests that defec­tive work iden­ti­fied before prac­ti­cal com­ple­tion is not a breach while the…

The impor­tance of a Request for Tender

Issu­ing a request for ten­der (RFT) is more than just secur­ing the best or low­est price. An RFT is your oppor­tu­ni­ty to man­age…

In the News

Michael Byrnes appeared on the Game Chang­ers Radio pod­cast host­ed by Craig Bruce and Irene Hulme on 24 April 2026 to dis­cuss the Fed­er­al Court case man­age­ment hear­ing in the sep­a­rate legal pro­ceed­ings com­menced by Kyle Sandi­lands and Jack­ie ​‘O’ Henderson

Michael Byrnes appeared on the Game Chang­ers Radio pod­cast host­ed by Craig Bruce and Irene Hulme on 24 April 202…

2026 Mer­i­tas Women’s Lead­er­ship Award, Return­er of the Year | Sarah Heuvel

Sarah Heuv­el, a Part­ner in our Prop­er­ty & Com­mer­cial team, has been recog­nised with a Mer­i­tas Women’s Lead­er­ship Award for her con­tri­bu­tion to…

Michael Byrnes appeared on the Game Chang­ers Radio pod­cast host­ed by Craig Bruce and Irene Hulme on 22 April 2026 to dis­cuss the lat­est devel­op­ments in the legal pro­ceed­ings com­menced by Kyle Sandi­lands against ARN

Michael Byrnes appeared on the Game Chang­ers Radio pod­cast host­ed by Craig Bruce and Irene Hulme on 22 April 202…

Sign up for our Newsletter

*Mandatory information