In Brief

Changes to Aus­trali­a’s intel­lec­tu­al prop­er­ty régime will come into full effect on 15 April 2013. These changes affect many of the process­es and pro­ce­dures for patent, design and trade mark protection.


For trade mark own­ers, this will mean that the peri­od with­in which a third par­ty can oppose an accept­ed appli­ca­tion from being reg­is­tered will be reduced from 3 months to 2 months. The change also applies to oppo­si­tion to removal of a trade mark for non-use. This change will apply to any trade marks that are adver­tised as accept­ed on or after 15 April 2013, or any appli­ca­tions for removal of a trade mark adver­tised on or after 15 April 2013

This short­er time­frame means that trade mark own­ers need to review any mar­ket mon­i­tor­ing that they cur­rent­ly under­take, to ensure that their process­es allow for suf­fi­cient time to meet this sig­nif­i­cant­ly short­er dead­line. This change makes it even more impor­tant to act quick­ly (and to obtain appro­pri­ate spe­cial­ist advice) if there is any con­cern with a com­pet­ing appli­ca­tion that has been accept­ed, or if an appli­ca­tion for removal of a reg­is­tered trade mark is made.

If you would like fur­ther infor­ma­tion about this, or any of the oth­er changes, or would like to dis­cuss imple­ment­ing a trade mark mon­i­tor­ing pro­gram, please con­tact Swaab Attorneys.

Co-authored by M Hall.

If you would like to repub­lish this arti­cle, it is gen­er­al­ly approved, but pri­or to doing so please con­tact the Mar­ket­ing team at marketing@​swaab.​com.​au. This arti­cle is not legal advice and the views and com­ments are of a gen­er­al nature only. This arti­cle is not to be relied upon in sub­sti­tu­tion for detailed legal advice.

Publications

Putting the West­pac Work­ing From Home Case in Perspective

Can employ­ees real­ly work from home if they want to? In a recent Fair Work case an employ­ee won the right to…

The risk of builder insol­ven­cy mid way through a con­struc­tion project is real (and will prob­a­bly be expensive)

Intro­duc­tionThis arti­cle pro­vides guid­ance to those under­tak­ing con­struc­tion works and iden­ti­fies a num­ber of con­tract pro­vi­sions which, if includ­ed in the…

Cross-Com­pa­ny Secu­ri­ty and Liq­uida­tor Chal­lenges: Full Fed­er­al Court Restores Cer­tain­ty in CEG Direct Secu­ri­ties v Coop­er [2025] FCAFC 47

A sig­nif­i­cant deci­sion from the Full Fed­er­al Court has clar­i­fied the lim­its of liq­uida­tors’ pow­ers to unwind cross-com­pa­ny secu­ri­ty grant­ed…

In the News

What the West­pac flex­i­ble work rul­ing real­ly means for employers

Michael Byrnes’ arti­cle ​“What the West­pac flex­i­ble work rul­ing real­ly means for employ­ers”, was pub­lished on HRM Online on 2…

Michael Byrnes dis­cuss­es the West­pac WFH case on 2SM with Tim Webster

Michael Byrnes appeared on Break­fast with Tim Web­ster on 2SM on 27 Octo­ber 2025 to dis­cuss the West­pac Work from…

Michael Byrnes is quot­ed in the arti­cle, What hap­pens when an employ­ee runs out of sick leave?”, pub­lished in HRM Online on 21 Octo­ber 2025

Michael Byrnes is quot­ed in the arti­cle, ​“What hap­pens when an employ­ee runs out of sick leave?”, pub­lished in HRM…

Sign up for our Newsletter

*Mandatory information