Marc Bad­dams and Sean Green­wood pro­vide an update fol­low­ing on from the recent arti­cle Changes to statu­to­ry demands from 1 Jan­u­ary 2021 post­ed on 23 Decem­ber 2021.

Update

The Cor­po­ra­tions Amend­ment (Cor­po­rate Insol­ven­cy Reforms) Act 2020 (Cth) (the Act), com­menced on 1 Jan­u­ary 2021. The Act pro­vides, among oth­er things, that for a three month peri­od from 1 Jan­u­ary 2021 to 31 March 2021, an eli­gi­ble small busi­ness will be able to declare its inten­tion to access a new small busi­ness restruc­tur­ing process (itself part of the Act) to its cred­i­tors through ASIC’s pub­lished notices website. 

Fol­low­ing such a dec­la­ra­tion, the exist­ing tem­po­rary insol­ven­cy relief that was place until the end of 2020 (relief from insol­vent trad­ing lia­bil­i­ty under sec­tion 588GAAA of the Cor­po­ra­tions Act 2001 (Cth) and the restric­tions on the issu­ing of statu­to­ry demands) would then apply to the busi­ness for a max­i­mum peri­od of three months (or four months if the com­pa­ny has obtained an exten­sion), until they are able to access a small busi­ness restruc­tur­ing prac­ti­tion­er or oth­er insol­ven­cy prac­ti­tion­er. The com­pa­ny will cease to be eli­gi­ble for the tem­po­rary relief fol­low­ing the expiry of this time peri­od, if the direc­tors with­draw the dec­la­ra­tion, or if the com­pa­ny enters exter­nal administration.

As not­ed above, this addi­tion­al peri­od of relief only begins when the direc­tors have made a dec­la­ra­tion about the company’s eli­gi­bil­i­ty for tem­po­rary restruc­tur­ing relief and pub­lished notice of mak­ing the dec­la­ra­tion on the ASIC’s pub­lished notices web­site. So, if the direc­tors of an oth­er­wise eli­gi­ble com­pa­ny do not make a dec­la­ra­tion and pub­lish a notice until (say) 1 Feb­ru­ary 2021, the com­pa­ny will not be eli­gi­ble for tem­po­rary restruc­tur­ing relief for the peri­od 1 Jan­u­ary 2021 to 31 Jan­u­ary 2021. This means the increased thresh­olds and time peri­ods for statu­to­ry demands ($20,000 and 6 months respec­tive­ly) will not apply dur­ing that period.

If you would like to repub­lish this arti­cle, it is gen­er­al­ly approved, but pri­or to doing so please con­tact the Mar­ket­ing team at marketing@​swaab.​com.​au. This arti­cle is not legal advice and the views and com­ments are of a gen­er­al nature only. This arti­cle is not to be relied upon in sub­sti­tu­tion for detailed legal advice.

Publications

Copy­right and Gen­er­a­tive AI: what Aus­tralia can learn from the Meta and Anthrop­ic Rulings

In 2025, two U.S. court deci­sions, Kadrey v. Meta and Bartz v. Anthrop­ic, have pro­vid­ed the first real judi­cial answers…

Fed­er­al Court Deci­sion Lim­its Effec­tive Use of Set-Off in Con­trac­tu­al Annu­al Salary Arrangements

The Deci­sionIn a recent Fed­er­al Court deci­sion*, Jus­tice Per­ram held that while con­trac­tu­al set-off claus­es in an annu­al salary arrange­ment can…

Pro­tect­ing your tomor­row, today: The impor­tance of an endur­ing pow­er of attorney

We often talk about the impor­tance of draft­ing your estate plan­ning doc­u­ments, includ­ing how draft­ing your will can ensure your…

In the News

Sarah Heuv­el pro­vides insight into get­ting Rent Roll Trans­ac­tions Com­pli­ance Compliant

Sarah Heuv­el in an inter­view with Matthew Cial­lel­la of MC Broking & Advi­so­ry, dis­cuss rent roll trans­ac­tions and the three key…

Michael Byrnes appeared on Mon­ey News with Evan Lucas on 2GB on 8 Sep­tem­ber 2025 to dis­cuss the recent Fed­er­al Court deci­sion relat­ing to salary arrange­ments, set-off claus­es and award compliance

Michael Byrnes appeared on Mon­ey News with Evan Lucas on 2GB on 8 Sep­tem­ber 2025 to dis­cuss the recent Fed­er­al Court…

Michael Byrnes has pub­lished an arti­cle titled Use of AI Crit­i­cised by FWC” in HR Leader on 2 Sep­tem­ber 2025.

Michael Byrnes has pub­lished an arti­cle titled ​“Use of AI Crit­i­cised by FWC” in HR Leader on 2 Sep­tem­ber 2025.To read the…

Sign up for our Newsletter

*Mandatory information