On 11 July 2012, the Aus­tralian Com­mu­ni­ca­tions and Media Author­i­ty (ACMA) agreed to reg­is­ter the new Telecom­mu­ni­ca­tions Con­sumer Pro­tec­tion Code (TCP). Reg­is­tra­tion takes effect on 1 Sep­tem­ber 2012 with phased imple­men­ta­tion over 12 months.

The TCP is intend­ed to:

  • align the oblig­a­tions of telecom­mu­ni­ca­tions providers under the Aus­tralian Con­sumer Law (ACL) and the TCP;
  • apply to all of the telecom­mu­ni­ca­tions sec­tor in Aus­tralia rather than a few key sig­na­to­ry participants;
  • pro­vide a stan­dard­ised régime across the telecom­mu­ni­ca­tions sector;
  • form the first step in coor­di­nat­ing the indus­try in prepa­ra­tion for the roll­out of the Nation­al Broad­band Net­work and the expect­ed leg­isla­tive over­haul in rela­tion to con­verged tech­nolo­gies; and
  • include com­mu­ni­ty safe­guards which were found to be lack­ing in ACMA’s 2011 pub­lic inquiry into the sec­tor, with many of ACMA’s rec­om­men­da­tions from its 2011 report (Recon­nect­ing the Cus­tomer) being incor­po­rat­ed into the revised TCP.

ACMA believes that the ben­e­fits will apply to both indus­try par­tic­i­pants and con­sumers alike.

Indus­try par­tic­i­pants will ben­e­fit from align­ment with the ACL and the TCP’s plain lan­guage, mean­ing that it will be eas­i­er to inter­pret, under­stand rights and imple­ment obligations.

Con­sumers should ben­e­fit from a range of enhanced require­ments in the TCP regard­ing adver­tis­ing, billing, expen­di­ture man­age­ment tools, finan­cial hard­ship arrange­ments, trans­fers between tel­co providers, stream­lined com­plaints han­dling and com­pli­ance. A new inde­pen­dent body, Com­mu­ni­ca­tions Com­pli­ance, will be cre­at­ed to mon­i­tor the per­for­mance of tel­co providers in com­ply­ing with the TCP.

If you have any ques­tions, please con­tact Swaab Attorneys.

If you would like to repub­lish this arti­cle, it is gen­er­al­ly approved, but pri­or to doing so please con­tact the Mar­ket­ing team at marketing@​swaab.​com.​au. This arti­cle is not legal advice and the views and com­ments are of a gen­er­al nature only. This arti­cle is not to be relied upon in sub­sti­tu­tion for detailed legal advice.

Publications

Where is my mind? The rise of con­tentious pro­bate pro­ceed­ings sur­round­ing the issue of tes­ta­men­tary capacity

In New South Wales, fam­i­ly pro­vi­sion and con­tentious pro­bate claims under the Suc­ces­sion Act 2006 (NSW) are increas­ing­ly focused on…

Kyle and Jack­ie O: The Work­place Rela­tions Law Perspective

The rela­tion­ship between show­busi­ness duos often comes to an acri­mo­nious end. Mar­tin and Lewis split at the height of their…

The Paper­cut Deci­sion and the Cur­rent Posi­tion on WFH

The FWC’s John­son v Paper­Cut Soft­ware deci­sion has renewed debate about the lim­its of work­ing from home rights. While some have…

In the News

Michael Byrnes appeared on The Quar­ter Hour, a radio indus­try pod­cast host­ed by Wade Kings­ley, to dis­cuss the legal aspects of the Kyle and Jack­ie O split, on 13 March 2026

Michael Byrnes appeared on The Quar­ter Hour, a radio indus­try pod­cast host­ed by Wade Kings­ley, to dis­cuss the legal aspects of the…

McK­night Tonight with Robert McK­night inter­views Michael Byrnes on the legal aspects of the Kyle and Jack­ie O split (from 28:25 to 51:00):

In this in‑depth inter­view, Michael Byrnes, Part­ner and employ­ment law spe­cial­ist, shares prac­ti­cal insights on work­place rela­tions, employ­ment law trends…

Michael Byrnes is quot­ed in the arti­cle, DIY jus­tice: The surge of self-rep­re­sen­ta­tion and its toll on the jus­tice sys­tem”, pub­lished in Lawyers Week­ly on 11 March 2026

Michael Byrnes is quot­ed in the arti­cle, ​“DIY jus­tice: The surge of self-rep­re­sen­ta­tion and its toll on the jus­tice sys­tem”…

Sign up for our Newsletter

*Mandatory information