On 11 July 2012, the Aus­tralian Com­mu­ni­ca­tions and Media Author­i­ty (ACMA) agreed to reg­is­ter the new Telecom­mu­ni­ca­tions Con­sumer Pro­tec­tion Code (TCP). Reg­is­tra­tion takes effect on 1 Sep­tem­ber 2012 with phased imple­men­ta­tion over 12 months.

The TCP is intend­ed to:

  • align the oblig­a­tions of telecom­mu­ni­ca­tions providers under the Aus­tralian Con­sumer Law (ACL) and the TCP;
  • apply to all of the telecom­mu­ni­ca­tions sec­tor in Aus­tralia rather than a few key sig­na­to­ry participants;
  • pro­vide a stan­dard­ised régime across the telecom­mu­ni­ca­tions sector;
  • form the first step in coor­di­nat­ing the indus­try in prepa­ra­tion for the roll­out of the Nation­al Broad­band Net­work and the expect­ed leg­isla­tive over­haul in rela­tion to con­verged tech­nolo­gies; and
  • include com­mu­ni­ty safe­guards which were found to be lack­ing in ACMA’s 2011 pub­lic inquiry into the sec­tor, with many of ACMA’s rec­om­men­da­tions from its 2011 report (Recon­nect­ing the Cus­tomer) being incor­po­rat­ed into the revised TCP.

ACMA believes that the ben­e­fits will apply to both indus­try par­tic­i­pants and con­sumers alike.

Indus­try par­tic­i­pants will ben­e­fit from align­ment with the ACL and the TCP’s plain lan­guage, mean­ing that it will be eas­i­er to inter­pret, under­stand rights and imple­ment obligations.

Con­sumers should ben­e­fit from a range of enhanced require­ments in the TCP regard­ing adver­tis­ing, billing, expen­di­ture man­age­ment tools, finan­cial hard­ship arrange­ments, trans­fers between tel­co providers, stream­lined com­plaints han­dling and com­pli­ance. A new inde­pen­dent body, Com­mu­ni­ca­tions Com­pli­ance, will be cre­at­ed to mon­i­tor the per­for­mance of tel­co providers in com­ply­ing with the TCP.

If you have any ques­tions, please con­tact Swaab Attorneys.

If you would like to repub­lish this arti­cle, it is gen­er­al­ly approved, but pri­or to doing so please con­tact the Mar­ket­ing team at marketing@​swaab.​com.​au. This arti­cle is not legal advice and the views and com­ments are of a gen­er­al nature only. This arti­cle is not to be relied upon in sub­sti­tu­tion for detailed legal advice.

Publications

Putting the West­pac Work­ing From Home Case in Perspective

Can employ­ees real­ly work from home if they want to? In a recent Fair Work case an employ­ee won the right to…

The risk of builder insol­ven­cy mid way through a con­struc­tion project is real (and will prob­a­bly be expensive)

Intro­duc­tionThis arti­cle pro­vides guid­ance to those under­tak­ing con­struc­tion works and iden­ti­fies a num­ber of con­tract pro­vi­sions which, if includ­ed in the…

Cross-Com­pa­ny Secu­ri­ty and Liq­uida­tor Chal­lenges: Full Fed­er­al Court Restores Cer­tain­ty in CEG Direct Secu­ri­ties v Coop­er [2025] FCAFC 47

A sig­nif­i­cant deci­sion from the Full Fed­er­al Court has clar­i­fied the lim­its of liq­uida­tors’ pow­ers to unwind cross-com­pa­ny secu­ri­ty grant­ed…

In the News

What the West­pac flex­i­ble work rul­ing real­ly means for employers

Michael Byrnes’ arti­cle ​“What the West­pac flex­i­ble work rul­ing real­ly means for employ­ers”, was pub­lished on HRM Online on 2…

Michael Byrnes dis­cuss­es the West­pac WFH case on 2SM with Tim Webster

Michael Byrnes appeared on Break­fast with Tim Web­ster on 2SM on 27 Octo­ber 2025 to dis­cuss the West­pac Work from…

Michael Byrnes is quot­ed in the arti­cle, What hap­pens when an employ­ee runs out of sick leave?”, pub­lished in HRM Online on 21 Octo­ber 2025

Michael Byrnes is quot­ed in the arti­cle, ​“What hap­pens when an employ­ee runs out of sick leave?”, pub­lished in HRM…

Sign up for our Newsletter

*Mandatory information