An Aus­tralian snack food com­pa­ny has been giv­en the go ahead to sell their pre­pared nuts prod­uct under its uncon­ven­tion­al brand name Nuckin Futs”, fol­low­ing a legal trade mark bat­tle span­ning 12 months.


The ini­tial trade mark appli­ca­tion for Nuckin Futs” was first reject­ed by the Trade Mark Office under the Trade Marks Act 1995, on the grounds that the mark was scan­dalous and offen­sive in light of it clear­ly being a Spooner­ism” of a col­lo­qui­al oath or obscen­i­ty. A spooner­ism is an error in speech or delib­er­ate play on words in which cor­re­spond­ing con­so­nants, vow­els, or mor­phemes are switched.

Solic­i­tors for the com­pa­ny argued against the objec­tion claim­ing that the name was not of an offen­sive nature because over the pas­sage of time, cer­tain terms which may have caused offence in the past, are now more wide­ly accept­ed par­tic­u­lar­ly with­in the Aus­tralian mar­ket. In par­tic­u­lar, it was sub­mit­ted that the f‑word” was now con­sid­ered to be accept­ed as part of every­day colour­ful and col­lo­qui­al Aus­tralian dis­course, which is inun­dat­ed with words of a far more scan­dalous’ nature.

In sup­port of the appli­ca­tion, the solic­i­tors also implied that one would have had to have lived an iso­lat­ed exis­tence to not come into reg­u­lar con­tact” with these or sim­i­lar words or phrases.

Refer­ring to the com­mon­ly accept­ed mean­ing of scan­dalous” as caus­ing a sig­nif­i­cant degree of dis­grace, shock or out­rage”, the solic­i­tors con­ced­ed that while there may be some lev­el of objec­tion to the use of Nuckin Futs”, it is not of a sig­nif­i­cant nature to sup­port the rejec­tion of the trade mark.

Last month, the Trade Marks Office agreed to allow the trade mark to pro­ceed to accep­tance, with a con­di­tion of reg­is­tra­tion that the trade mark will not be mar­ket­ed to children.

With reg­is­tra­tion of this con­tro­ver­sial trade mark due in July 2012, this deci­sion will serve as a use­ful ref­er­ence for trade mark own­ers who are inter­est­ed in reg­is­ter­ing play­ful and risqutrade marks in con­nec­tion with their goods and services.

If you would like to repub­lish this arti­cle, it is gen­er­al­ly approved, but pri­or to doing so please con­tact the Mar­ket­ing team at marketing@​swaab.​com.​au. This arti­cle is not legal advice and the views and com­ments are of a gen­er­al nature only. This arti­cle is not to be relied upon in sub­sti­tu­tion for detailed legal advice.

Publications

Dis­clo­sure: When is enough enough?

Dis­clo­sure, the fam­i­ly law equiv­a­lent of dis­cov­ery in oth­er kinds of civ­il pro­ceed­ings, is a foun­da­tion­al part of fam­i­ly law matters. The Fed­er­al…

When Judges return to prac­tice: a clos­er look at the deci­sion in Tan­it & Tanit

In the Fed­er­al Cir­cuit and Fam­i­ly Court of Aus­tralia, being a Fed­er­al Court, the com­pul­so­ry retire­ment age of Judges is 70 years…

SP6534 v Elkhouri; Own­ers Cor­po­ra­tion SP6534 v Per­pet­u­al Cor­po­rate Trust Ltd [2024] NSW­CA 279 (in Eq. Div) (27 Novem­ber 2024)

Back­ground and PartiesMr. Elkhouri (Elkhouri) owned Lot 11, a pent­house apart­ment in an 11 lot res­i­den­tial stra­ta scheme at Point Piper, Syd­ney. The…

In the News

Press Release | New Senior Lawyer Appoint­ments: Jess Hui — Senior Asso­ciate & Han­nah Mack­ay — Associate

Jess Hui takes on the role of Senior Asso­ciate in our Cor­po­rate and Com­mer­cial team. Jess brings exten­sive expe­ri­ence advis­ing…

Press Release | Swaab assists RZ Resources to obtain mile­stone crit­i­cal min­er­als project approval

Locat­ed approx­i­mate­ly 180km south-west of Bro­ken Hill, the project is expect­ed to process up to 27 mil­lion tonnes of mate­r­i­al…

Lawyers Week­ly — Syd­ney firm hosts Ger­man trainee in believed first-of-its-kind placement

Ear­li­er this year we wel­comed trainee lawyer Char­lotte Schnitzen­baumer from Munich-based law firm GvW Graf von West­phalen for a three‑month inter­na­tion­al…

Sign up for our Newsletter

*Mandatory information