An Aus­tralian snack food com­pa­ny has been giv­en the go ahead to sell their pre­pared nuts prod­uct under its uncon­ven­tion­al brand name Nuckin Futs”, fol­low­ing a legal trade mark bat­tle span­ning 12 months.


The ini­tial trade mark appli­ca­tion for Nuckin Futs” was first reject­ed by the Trade Mark Office under the Trade Marks Act 1995, on the grounds that the mark was scan­dalous and offen­sive in light of it clear­ly being a Spooner­ism” of a col­lo­qui­al oath or obscen­i­ty. A spooner­ism is an error in speech or delib­er­ate play on words in which cor­re­spond­ing con­so­nants, vow­els, or mor­phemes are switched.

Solic­i­tors for the com­pa­ny argued against the objec­tion claim­ing that the name was not of an offen­sive nature because over the pas­sage of time, cer­tain terms which may have caused offence in the past, are now more wide­ly accept­ed par­tic­u­lar­ly with­in the Aus­tralian mar­ket. In par­tic­u­lar, it was sub­mit­ted that the f‑word” was now con­sid­ered to be accept­ed as part of every­day colour­ful and col­lo­qui­al Aus­tralian dis­course, which is inun­dat­ed with words of a far more scan­dalous’ nature.

In sup­port of the appli­ca­tion, the solic­i­tors also implied that one would have had to have lived an iso­lat­ed exis­tence to not come into reg­u­lar con­tact” with these or sim­i­lar words or phrases.

Refer­ring to the com­mon­ly accept­ed mean­ing of scan­dalous” as caus­ing a sig­nif­i­cant degree of dis­grace, shock or out­rage”, the solic­i­tors con­ced­ed that while there may be some lev­el of objec­tion to the use of Nuckin Futs”, it is not of a sig­nif­i­cant nature to sup­port the rejec­tion of the trade mark.

Last month, the Trade Marks Office agreed to allow the trade mark to pro­ceed to accep­tance, with a con­di­tion of reg­is­tra­tion that the trade mark will not be mar­ket­ed to children.

With reg­is­tra­tion of this con­tro­ver­sial trade mark due in July 2012, this deci­sion will serve as a use­ful ref­er­ence for trade mark own­ers who are inter­est­ed in reg­is­ter­ing play­ful and risqutrade marks in con­nec­tion with their goods and services.

If you would like to repub­lish this arti­cle, it is gen­er­al­ly approved, but pri­or to doing so please con­tact the Mar­ket­ing team at marketing@​swaab.​com.​au. This arti­cle is not legal advice and the views and com­ments are of a gen­er­al nature only. This arti­cle is not to be relied upon in sub­sti­tu­tion for detailed legal advice.

Publications

10 year long stop on build­ing defect claims rein­forced for con­tri­bu­tion claims

The recent deci­sion in For­tius Broad­way No 1 Pty Ltd V ACN 103 211 141 Pty Ltd (for­mer­ly known as Wat­pac Con­struc­tion…

A High­er Evi­den­tiary Bur­den for Work Orders: The Prac­ti­cal Impli­ca­tions of The Own­ers – Stra­ta Plan No 102171 v Ceerose Pty Ltd [2025] NSW­CATCD 137

The deci­sion in The Own­ers – Stra­ta Plan No 102171 v Ceerose Pty Ltd; Zone Q Mil­sons Point Devel­op­ment Pty Ltd v Ceerose…

Impor­tant Work­place Rela­tions Changes Effec­tive 1 July 2026

Employ­ers and employ­ees alike should be aware of impor­tant changes in the work­place rela­tions are­na, effec­tive 1 July 2026. From that date:the…

In the News

Roger Corn­forth Retires Fol­low­ing 45 Years of Dis­tin­guished Legal Practice

Roger’s career has been defined by trust­ed rela­tion­ships, prac­ti­cal advice and an unwa­ver­ing com­mit­ment to his clients. Begin­ning his legal…

Protest group los­es appeal to obtain gov­ern­ment documents

The cas­es — Mudgee Region Health Alliance v Min­is­ter for Finance, Domes­tic Man­u­fac­tur­ing and Gov­ern­ment Pro­cure­ment and Nat­ur­al Resources [2026] NSW­CATAD…

Michael Byrnes is quot­ed in the arti­cle, The PM v work­place stan­dards”, pub­lished in HR Leader on 8 July 2026

Michael Byrnes is quot­ed in the arti­cle, ​“The PM v work­place stan­dards”, pub­lished in HR Leader on 8 July 2026To read the…

Sign up for our Newsletter

*Mandatory information