In Brief — Mixed use build­ings, refur­bish­ments and Envi­ron­men­tal Upgrade Agreements

The Com­mer­cial Build­ings Manda­to­ry Dis­clo­sure Régime has under­gone amend­ments, effec­tive 29 Novem­ber 2010, relat­ed to mixed use build­ings and refur­bish­ments. The Local Gov­ern­ment Amend­ment (Envi­ron­men­tal Upgrade Agree­ments) Bill 2010 facil­i­tates a financ­ing mech­a­nism for build­ing own­ers to imple­ment major long term ener­gy effi­cien­cy upgrades to buildings.


Mixed use buildings

Mixed use build­ings which com­prise office space with oth­er uses such as retail, indus­tri­al, hotel or hos­pi­tal are now not required to dis­close a NABERS ener­gy rat­ing if the build­ing has less than 75% office space (cal­cu­lat­ed on net let­table area). How­ev­er, this is an inter­im mea­sure dur­ing the 12 month tran­si­tion peri­od which expires on 31 Octo­ber 2011.

This devel­op­ment has the effect of exclud­ing most indus­tri­al and retail premis­es from com­ply­ing with the new manda­to­ry dis­clo­sure régime, even if the office com­po­nent is greater than 2,000 sq metres.

Refurbishments

In cas­es where build­ings under­go major refur­bish­ments, there is now no require­ment to dis­close a NABERS ener­gy rat­ing for two years from the date of the cer­tifi­cate of occu­pan­cy relat­ing to the refur­bish­ment, on the con­di­tion that the refur­bish­ments meet three criteria:

  • They involve sub­stan­tial change to the fab­ric, plan or equipment
  • They require the issue of a cer­tifi­cate of occu­pan­cy under State or Ter­ri­to­ry legislation
  • They will have a sub­stan­tial effect on the ener­gy per­for­mance of the base building

Addi­tion­al infor­ma­tion can be found at the gov­ern­men­t’s Com­mer­cial Build­ing Dis­clo­sure web­site.

Local Gov­ern­ment Amend­ment (Envi­ron­men­tal Upgrade Agree­ments) Bill 2010

This bill facil­i­tates a financ­ing mech­a­nism for build­ing own­ers to imple­ment major long term ener­gy effi­cien­cy upgrades to build­ings. The con­cept of an envi­ron­men­tal upgrade agree­ment” will be intro­duced to assist build­ing own­ers to gain access to com­mer­cial finance in the time­frame and on terms need­ed to progress cost effec­tive envi­ron­men­tal upgrade works.

The pro­posed envi­ron­men­tal upgrade agree­ments will oper­ate accord­ing to the fol­low­ing framework:

  • The lender pro­vides finance to the build­ing owner
  • The lender takes a charge over the building
  • The build­ing own­er upgrades the building
  • The build­ing own­er then makes reg­u­lar pay­ments to the local coun­cil in the form of a spe­cial rate or charge
  • When repay­ment is received, the coun­cil for­wards it to the lender to repay the debt

Par­tic­i­pa­tion on the part of build­ing own­ers, lenders and local coun­cils is voluntary.

Pass­ing on costs to the tenant

In prin­ci­ple, as the spe­cial rate or charge will be ren­dered by coun­cil, it is like­ly to fall under the def­i­n­i­tion of out­go­ings” in a lease and there­fore be capa­ble of being on-charged to the ten­ant under the out­go­ings pro­vi­sions of the lease. How­ev­er, ten­ants must not be required to pay more than they would have been required to pay had the envi­ron­men­tal upgrade agree­ment not been in place.

In prac­ti­cal terms, the ben­e­fit in the reduced pow­er bill as a result of the envi­ron­men­tal upgrade must out­weigh the con­tri­bu­tion that the ten­ant will be required to make under the out­go­ings pro­vi­sions of the lease.

A copy of the Local Gov­ern­ment Amend­ment (Envi­ron­men­tal Upgrade Agree­ments) Bill 2010 can be down­loaded from the web­site of NSW Par­lia­ment.

For fur­ther infor­ma­tion please contact:

If you would like to repub­lish this arti­cle, it is gen­er­al­ly approved, but pri­or to doing so please con­tact the Mar­ket­ing team at marketing@​swaab.​com.​au. This arti­cle is not legal advice and the views and com­ments are of a gen­er­al nature only. This arti­cle is not to be relied upon in sub­sti­tu­tion for detailed legal advice.

Publications

The risk of builder insol­ven­cy mid way through a con­struc­tion project is real (and will prob­a­bly be expensive)

Intro­duc­tionThis arti­cle pro­vides guid­ance to those under­tak­ing con­struc­tion works and iden­ti­fies a num­ber of con­tract pro­vi­sions which, if includ­ed in the…

Cross-Com­pa­ny Secu­ri­ty and Liq­uida­tor Chal­lenges: Full Fed­er­al Court Restores Cer­tain­ty in CEG Direct Secu­ri­ties v Coop­er [2025] FCAFC 47

A sig­nif­i­cant deci­sion from the Full Fed­er­al Court has clar­i­fied the lim­its of liq­uida­tors’ pow­ers to unwind cross-com­pa­ny secu­ri­ty grant­ed…

Copy­right and Gen­er­a­tive AI: what Aus­tralia can learn from the Meta and Anthrop­ic Rulings

In 2025, two U.S. court deci­sions, Kadrey v. Meta and Bartz v. Anthrop­ic, have pro­vid­ed the first real judi­cial answers…

In the News

Michael Byrnes is quot­ed in the arti­cle, The reac­tion to Char­lie Kirk’s assas­si­na­tion and its impli­ca­tions for employ­ment law”, pub­lished in Lawyers Week­ly on 26 Sep­tem­ber 2025

Michael Byrnes is quot­ed in the arti­cle, ​“The reac­tion to Char­lie Kirk’s assas­si­na­tion and its impli­ca­tions for employ­ment law”, pub­lished…

Sarah Heuv­el pro­vides insight into get­ting Rent Roll Trans­ac­tions Com­pli­ance Compliant

Sarah Heuv­el in an inter­view with Matthew Cial­lel­la of MC Broking & Advi­so­ry, dis­cuss rent roll trans­ac­tions and the three key…

Michael Byrnes appeared on Mon­ey News with Evan Lucas on 2GB on 8 Sep­tem­ber 2025 to dis­cuss the recent Fed­er­al Court deci­sion relat­ing to salary arrange­ments, set-off claus­es and award compliance

Michael Byrnes appeared on Mon­ey News with Evan Lucas on 2GB on 8 Sep­tem­ber 2025 to dis­cuss the recent Fed­er­al Court…

Sign up for our Newsletter

*Mandatory information