In Brief — Enforce­ment of court orders and par­ent­ing plans

A court can fine or gaol a par­ent for not abid­ing by court orders. How­ev­er, this is not the case with par­ent­ing plans. 


Par­ents’ responsibility

With­out court orders or par­ent­ing plans, both par­ents are legal­ly respon­si­ble for their children’s upbring­ing and this respon­si­bil­i­ty con­tin­ues even if the rela­tion­ship breaks down. Gen­er­al­ly, par­ents are the peo­ple who know what is best for their chil­dren, so it is usu­al­ly in the best inter­ests of chil­dren for par­ents to agree about what will hap­pen to their chil­dren. This agree­ment can be doc­u­ment­ed either as con­sent orders with the court, or a par­ent­ing plan.

What is a par­ent­ing plan?

A par­ent­ing plan is a writ­ten doc­u­ment con­firm­ing what the par­ents have agreed to with respect to their chil­dren. It is signed and dat­ed by both par­ents, but is not lodged with the court (in the way that con­sent orders are). Par­ent­ing plans are not legal­ly bind­ing and can­not be enforced by the court. How­ev­er, it is not rec­om­mend­ed that you enter into a par­ent­ing plan with­out seek­ing legal advice first, as the pro­vi­sions of the par­ent­ing plan are very per­sua­sive and the court may take them into account.

Enforce­able agreements

Giv­en that par­ent­ing plans are not enforce­able, if you reach an agree­ment with your for­mer spouse about par­ent­ing arrange­ments for your chil­dren and would like to make the agree­ment enforce­able, then you will need to doc­u­ment your agree­ment as con­sent orders sealed by the court.

Enforce­ment of court orders

If you have court orders, they can be enforced by the court through var­i­ous means. For exam­ple, a court can order that the chil­dren are col­lect­ed from one par­ent and deliv­ered to the care of the oth­er par­ent, or that there be make up time giv­en if one par­ent miss­es time with the chil­dren because of the actions of the oth­er par­ent. A court can fine or even gaol a par­ent who does not abide by court orders. There is also the pos­si­bil­i­ty that a court will change orders to reflect that the chil­dren live with the oth­er par­ent if a par­ent does not com­ply with the court orders.

For fur­ther infor­ma­tion, please contact:

If you would like to repub­lish this arti­cle, it is gen­er­al­ly approved, but pri­or to doing so please con­tact the Mar­ket­ing team at marketing@​swaab.​com.​au. This arti­cle is not legal advice and the views and com­ments are of a gen­er­al nature only. This arti­cle is not to be relied upon in sub­sti­tu­tion for detailed legal advice.

Publications

Own­ers Cor­po­ra­tions / Asso­ci­a­tions now sub­ject to Unfair Con­tract Terms 

Under the new stra­ta law reforms com­menc­ing 1 July 2025 (the Stra­ta Schemes Leg­is­la­tion Amend­ment Act 2025 (No. 14) NSW) a key change…

Unfair con­tract terms in out­dat­ed stan­dard form con­tracts could cost you a fine of $50 mil­lion (Com­pa­nies) or $2.5 mil­lion (Indi­vid­u­als)

If you have not reviewed your stan­dard form con­struc­tion con­tracts since 9 Novem­ber 2023 (when the amend­ed Com­pe­ti­tion and Con­sumer Act…

Impor­tant Work­place Rela­tions Changes Effec­tive 1 July 2025

Employ­ers and employ­ees alike should be aware of impor­tant changes in the work­place rela­tions are­na, effec­tive 1 July 2025. From that date:the high income…

In the News

Michael Byrnes quot­ed in the arti­cle, “‘Creep­ing’ unfair dis­missal thresh­old will increase to $183k on 1 July”, pub­lished in HR Leader on 27 June 2025

Michael Byrnes quot­ed in the arti­cle, “‘Creep­ing’ unfair dis­missal thresh­old will increase to $183k on 1 July”, pub­lished in HR Leader…

Michael Byrnes is quot­ed in the arti­cle, ABC may face sig­nif­i­cant penal­ties’ after can­cel cul­ture’ sack­ing ruled unlaw­ful”, pub­lished in HR Leader on 26 June 2025

Michael Byrnes is quot­ed in the arti­cle, ​“ABC may face ​‘sig­nif­i­cant penal­ties’ after ​‘can­cel cul­ture’ sack­ing ruled unlaw­ful”, pub­lished in…

Michael Byrnes is quot­ed in the arti­cle, Pro­posed non-com­pete ban could back­fire on work­ers, firm warns”, pub­lished in Lawyers Week­ly on 20 May 2025

Michael Byrnes is quot­ed in the arti­cle, ​“Pro­posed non-com­pete ban could back­fire on work­ers, firm warns”, pub­lished in Lawyers Week­ly…

Sign up for our Newsletter

*Mandatory information