Cer­tain peo­ple such as a hus­band, wife, part­ner, chil­dren, grand­chil­dren and oth­ers are enti­tled to make a claim on an Estate of a deceased per­son if that per­son left the claimant with inad­e­quate pro­vi­sion in their Will or on intes­ta­cy (with­out a Will).

By the Suc­ces­sion Amend­ment (Fam­i­ly Pro­vi­sion) Act 2008, the leg­is­la­tion in this area changed on 1 March 2009.

The law is still sub­stan­tial­ly sim­i­lar, but the more impor­tant changes are as follows:

  1. Claimants now have to make a claim with­in 12 months of the deceased’s death (where­as pre­vi­ous­ly a claim could be made with­in 18 months).
  2. The Act sets out in some detail the fac­tors that the court should take into account when con­sid­er­ing a claim (where­as pre­vi­ous­ly this was not clear­ly set out in the legislation).
  3. The court can make an order regard­ing prop­er­ty in or out­side of New South Wales whether or not the deceased per­son lived in New South Wales at the date of death.
  4. There are spe­cial rules designed to save the Estate and claimant legal costs by dis­pens­ing with the rules of evi­dence where the Estate has a val­ue of less than $750,000.

The inten­tion behind these amend­ments is to has­ten the process of deal­ing with claims made by a claimant on an Estate. That means that, as unsavoury as this might be, claimants and Execu­tors have to start address­ing these issues with­in a few months of the deceased’s death.

For fur­ther infor­ma­tion contact:

If you would like to repub­lish this arti­cle, it is gen­er­al­ly approved, but pri­or to doing so please con­tact the Mar­ket­ing team at marketing@​swaab.​com.​au. This arti­cle is not legal advice and the views and com­ments are of a gen­er­al nature only. This arti­cle is not to be relied upon in sub­sti­tu­tion for detailed legal advice.

Publications

Work­place Rela­tion­ships: The Legal Posi­tion (Cold­play Con­cert Edition)

The recent sto­ry of col­leagues (a Chief Exec­u­tive Offi­cer and Chief Peo­ple Offi­cer (CPO)) whose appar­ent rela­tion­ship was cap­tured on…

Dis­missal for Dissent?

The recent unfair dis­missal deci­sion of the Fair Work Com­mis­sion, Shaun Turn­er v Dare­bin City Coun­cil [2025] FWC 1763, in which Deputy…

Con­struc­tion con­tract time­frames and their inter­ac­tion with the NSW Secu­ri­ty of Pay­ment legislation.

Mark Glynn, Con­struc­tion Part­ner at Swaab con­sid­ers the recent deci­sion of Shar­vain Facades Pty Ltd (Admin­is­tra­tors Appoint­ed) v Roberts Co (NSW)…

In the News

Press Release | New Spe­cial Coun­sel Appoint­ment — Peter Bournas

Peter brings more than 20 years of senior legal and prop­er­ty exper­tise, span­ning pri­vate prac­tice, in-house roles with­in the air­port sec­tor…

Michael Byrnes appeared on Break­fast with Tim Web­ster on 2SM on 23 July 2025 to dis­cuss work­place rela­tion­ships and that Cold­play concert

Michael Byrnes appeared on Break­fast with Tim Web­ster on 2SM on 23 July 2025 to dis­cuss work­place rela­tion­ships and that…

Michael Byrnes is quot­ed in the arti­cle, Cold­play con­tro­ver­sy expos­es HR vul­ner­a­bil­i­ty in lead­er­ship rela­tion­ships”, pub­lished in HR Leader on 23 July 2025

Michael Byrnes is quot­ed in the arti­cle, ​“Cold­play con­tro­ver­sy expos­es HR vul­ner­a­bil­i­ty in lead­er­ship rela­tion­ships”, pub­lished in HR Leader on…

Sign up for our Newsletter

*Mandatory information