In Brief

On 2 May 2012, the Com­mon­wealth Attor­ney-Gen­er­al, Nico­la Rox­on, announced that pro­posed amend­ments to the Pri­va­cy Act 1988 (Cth) will be intro­duced dur­ing the win­ter ses­sion of Fed­er­al Par­lia­ment. The pro­posed amend­ments will include changes to the way in which cred­it report­ing oper­ates in Australia.


The pro­posed changes to cred­it report­ing aim to give con­sumers increased pow­er to access and cor­rect cred­it infor­ma­tion report­ed about them. The Attor­ney-Gen­er­al’s Depart­ment says that the ben­e­fi­cial changes for con­sumers will be:

  • a clear require­ment for organ­i­sa­tions to jus­ti­fy or sub­stan­ti­ate dis­put­ed cred­it listings;
  • mea­sures to make it eas­i­er for indi­vid­u­als to access and cor­rect their cred­it report­ing infor­ma­tion; and
  • a sim­pler process for com­plaints about cred­it list­ings whereby: 
    • com­plaints can be made direct­ly to the Pri­va­cy Com­mis­sion­er rather than first being made to the cred­it provider or cred­it report­ing agency; and
    • alter­na­tive dis­pute res­o­lu­tion will be used to more effec­tive­ly resolve complaints.

There will also be a pro­hi­bi­tion on col­lect­ing cred­it infor­ma­tion about children.

The exact form of the pro­posed amend­ments will not be known until the Bill is intro­duced into Parliament.

In its media release about the reforms, the Attor­ney-Gen­er­al’s Depart­ment says that along with the ben­e­fits for con­sumers, the cred­it indus­try will ben­e­fit from the reforms because the changes will pro­vide a more accu­rate pic­ture of an individual’s cred­it sit­u­a­tion” which will help the indus­try make a robust assess­ment of cred­it risk, which is expect­ed to lead to low­er cred­it default rates.”

If you would like to repub­lish this arti­cle, it is gen­er­al­ly approved, but pri­or to doing so please con­tact the Mar­ket­ing team at marketing@​swaab.​com.​au. This arti­cle is not legal advice and the views and com­ments are of a gen­er­al nature only. This arti­cle is not to be relied upon in sub­sti­tu­tion for detailed legal advice.

Publications

Putting the West­pac Work­ing From Home Case in Perspective

Can employ­ees real­ly work from home if they want to? In a recent Fair Work case an employ­ee won the right to…

The risk of builder insol­ven­cy mid way through a con­struc­tion project is real (and will prob­a­bly be expensive)

Intro­duc­tionThis arti­cle pro­vides guid­ance to those under­tak­ing con­struc­tion works and iden­ti­fies a num­ber of con­tract pro­vi­sions which, if includ­ed in the…

Cross-Com­pa­ny Secu­ri­ty and Liq­uida­tor Chal­lenges: Full Fed­er­al Court Restores Cer­tain­ty in CEG Direct Secu­ri­ties v Coop­er [2025] FCAFC 47

A sig­nif­i­cant deci­sion from the Full Fed­er­al Court has clar­i­fied the lim­its of liq­uida­tors’ pow­ers to unwind cross-com­pa­ny secu­ri­ty grant­ed…

In the News

What the West­pac flex­i­ble work rul­ing real­ly means for employers

Michael Byrnes’ arti­cle ​“What the West­pac flex­i­ble work rul­ing real­ly means for employ­ers”, was pub­lished on HRM Online on 2…

Michael Byrnes dis­cuss­es the West­pac WFH case on 2SM with Tim Webster

Michael Byrnes appeared on Break­fast with Tim Web­ster on 2SM on 27 Octo­ber 2025 to dis­cuss the West­pac Work from…

Michael Byrnes is quot­ed in the arti­cle, What hap­pens when an employ­ee runs out of sick leave?”, pub­lished in HRM Online on 21 Octo­ber 2025

Michael Byrnes is quot­ed in the arti­cle, ​“What hap­pens when an employ­ee runs out of sick leave?”, pub­lished in HRM…

Sign up for our Newsletter

*Mandatory information