In Brief

On 2 May 2012, the Com­mon­wealth Attor­ney-Gen­er­al, Nico­la Rox­on, announced that pro­posed amend­ments to the Pri­va­cy Act 1988 (Cth) will be intro­duced dur­ing the win­ter ses­sion of Fed­er­al Par­lia­ment. The pro­posed amend­ments will include changes to the way in which cred­it report­ing oper­ates in Australia.


The pro­posed changes to cred­it report­ing aim to give con­sumers increased pow­er to access and cor­rect cred­it infor­ma­tion report­ed about them. The Attor­ney-Gen­er­al’s Depart­ment says that the ben­e­fi­cial changes for con­sumers will be:

  • a clear require­ment for organ­i­sa­tions to jus­ti­fy or sub­stan­ti­ate dis­put­ed cred­it listings;
  • mea­sures to make it eas­i­er for indi­vid­u­als to access and cor­rect their cred­it report­ing infor­ma­tion; and
  • a sim­pler process for com­plaints about cred­it list­ings whereby: 
    • com­plaints can be made direct­ly to the Pri­va­cy Com­mis­sion­er rather than first being made to the cred­it provider or cred­it report­ing agency; and
    • alter­na­tive dis­pute res­o­lu­tion will be used to more effec­tive­ly resolve complaints.

There will also be a pro­hi­bi­tion on col­lect­ing cred­it infor­ma­tion about children.

The exact form of the pro­posed amend­ments will not be known until the Bill is intro­duced into Parliament.

In its media release about the reforms, the Attor­ney-Gen­er­al’s Depart­ment says that along with the ben­e­fits for con­sumers, the cred­it indus­try will ben­e­fit from the reforms because the changes will pro­vide a more accu­rate pic­ture of an individual’s cred­it sit­u­a­tion” which will help the indus­try make a robust assess­ment of cred­it risk, which is expect­ed to lead to low­er cred­it default rates.”

If you would like to repub­lish this arti­cle, it is gen­er­al­ly approved, but pri­or to doing so please con­tact the Mar­ket­ing team at marketing@​swaab.​com.​au. This arti­cle is not legal advice and the views and com­ments are of a gen­er­al nature only. This arti­cle is not to be relied upon in sub­sti­tu­tion for detailed legal advice.

Publications

The Paper­cut Deci­sion and the Cur­rent Posi­tion on WFH

The FWC’s John­son v Paper­Cut Soft­ware deci­sion has renewed debate about the lim­its of work­ing from home rights. While some have…

Valen­tine’s Day in the Work­place (2026 Edition)

Valentine’s Day may appear harm­less, but in work­places it can cre­ate legal and cul­tur­al risks. Even well‑meant roman­tic ges­tures can…

Aus­tralia Day Sub­sti­tu­tion: The Legal Issues (2026 Edition)

As more major employ­ers allow staff to work on Aus­tralia Day and take the pub­lic hol­i­day lat­er, impor­tant legal ques­tions…

In the News

More than harm­less fun: How Valentine’s Day can blur the line between cel­e­bra­tion and harassment

Michael Byrnes is quot­ed in the arti­cle, ​“More than harm­less fun: How Valentine’s Day can blur the line between cel­e­bra­tion…

Michael Byrnes is quot­ed in the arti­cle, The legal impli­ca­tions of the Dig­i­tal Work Sys­tems Bill”, pub­lished in HR Leader

Michael Byrnes is quot­ed in the arti­cle, ​“The legal impli­ca­tions of the Dig­i­tal Work Sys­tems Bill”, pub­lished in HR LeaderTo read…

Hap­py Lunar New Year 2026 – Wel­com­ing the Year of the Fire Horse

The Fire Horse (Bing Wu) is known for its bold ener­gy, charis­ma, speed, and trans­for­ma­tive spir­it, sym­bol­is­ing a peri­od of break­throughs…

Sign up for our Newsletter

*Mandatory information