On 30 April 2012, the Fed­er­al Gov­ern­men­t’s report on its Con­ver­gence Review was released. The report aims to devel­op tech­no­log­i­cal­ly neu­tral leg­is­la­tion and pol­i­cy to meet trends and rapid changes in tech­nol­o­gy in the com­mu­ni­ca­tions and broad­cast­ing sec­tors such as social media, and tele­vi­sion and radio ser­vices deliv­ered over the internet.

The Report rec­om­mends prin­ci­ple-based reg­u­la­tion that pro­vides high-lev­el guid­ance to busi­ness­es and indi­vid­u­als on com­pli­ance, but is flex­i­ble enough to change with tech­no­log­i­cal advancements.

In par­tic­u­lar, three dis­tinct areas of change are recommended:

  1. Short term changes, includ­ing amend­ments to polices, pro­grams and leg­is­la­tion, such as a pub­lic inter­est’ test that will apply to changes in con­trol of con­tent ser­vice enter­pris­es and media oper­a­tors that have sig­nif­i­cant influ­ence in par­tic­u­lar local mar­kets. The pub­lic inter­est test aims to main­tain diver­si­ty at a nation­al lev­el and is intend­ed to com­ple­ment rather than dupli­cate the cur­rent pow­ers of the Aus­tralian Com­pe­ti­tion and Con­sumer Com­mis­sion in rela­tion to merg­ers and acquisitions.
  2. New con­tent ser­vices leg­is­la­tion to replace the Broad­cast­ing Ser­vices Act 1992 (Cth) as well as key areas of the Telecom­mu­ni­ca­tions Act and to pro­vide a new clas­si­fi­ca­tion sys­tem that reg­u­lates con­tent across dif­fer­ent media and reflects com­mu­ni­ty standards.
  3. Reform of com­mu­ni­ca­tions leg­is­la­tion to pro­vide for a tech­nol­o­gy-neu­tral frame­work that would apply to com­mu­ni­ca­tions infra­struc­ture, plat­forms, devices and ser­vices offered to the Aus­tralia public.

The Report pro­pos­es that a new com­mu­ni­ca­tions reg­u­la­tor be estab­lished to imple­ment the first stage of the rec­om­men­da­tions. It is not yet known when this will take place.

We will keep you updat­ed with the progress in the imple­men­ta­tion of the out­comes of the Con­ver­gence Review. In the mean­time, if you have any ques­tions, please con­tact Swaab Attorneys.

If you would like to repub­lish this arti­cle, it is gen­er­al­ly approved, but pri­or to doing so please con­tact the Mar­ket­ing team at marketing@​swaab.​com.​au. This arti­cle is not legal advice and the views and com­ments are of a gen­er­al nature only. This arti­cle is not to be relied upon in sub­sti­tu­tion for detailed legal advice.

Publications

A High­er Evi­den­tiary Bur­den for Work Orders: The Prac­ti­cal Impli­ca­tions of The Own­ers – Stra­ta Plan No 102171 v Ceerose Pty Ltd [2025] NSW­CATCD 137

The deci­sion in The Own­ers – Stra­ta Plan No 102171 v Ceerose Pty Ltd; Zone Q Mil­sons Point Devel­op­ment Pty Ltd v Ceerose…

Impor­tant Work­place Rela­tions Changes Effec­tive 1 July 2026

Employ­ers and employ­ees alike should be aware of impor­tant changes in the work­place rela­tions are­na, effec­tive 1 July 2026. From that date:the…

Strata Plan 92183 v Samdora Pty Ltd [2026] NSWSC 406 | 'Substantive Control' over Works & s37 of the DB&P Act

In this case, the plain­tiff (Stra­ta Plan 92183) brought pro­ceed­ings alleg­ing defec­tive res­i­den­tial build­ing work in rela­tion to 9 town hous­es…

In the News

Protest group los­es appeal to obtain gov­ern­ment documents

The cas­es — Mudgee Region Health Alliance v Min­is­ter for Finance, Domes­tic Man­u­fac­tur­ing and Gov­ern­ment Pro­cure­ment and Nat­ur­al Resources [2026] NSW­CATAD…

Michael Byrnes is quot­ed in the arti­cle, The PM v work­place stan­dards”, pub­lished in HR Leader on 8 July 2026

Michael Byrnes is quot­ed in the arti­cle, ​“The PM v work­place stan­dards”, pub­lished in HR Leader on 8 July 2026To read the…

Michael Byrnes is quot­ed in the arti­cle, When does a com­pet­i­tive cul­ture become a legal risk?”, pub­lished in AHRI AM on 6 July 2026

Michael Byrnes is quot­ed in the arti­cle, ​“When does a com­pet­i­tive cul­ture become a legal risk?”, pub­lished in AHRI AM on 6 July…

Sign up for our Newsletter

*Mandatory information