ASIC has been mon­i­tor­ing the increased use of crowd fund­ing in Aus­tralia for invest­ment purposes.

Crowd fund­ing’ involves the use of the inter­net and social media to raise funds in sup­port of a spe­cif­ic project or busi­ness idea. Project spon­sors typ­i­cal­ly receive some nom­i­nal reward in return for their funds.

On 14 August 2012, ASIC issued guid­ance to pro­mot­ers of crowd fund­ing’ to clar­i­fy arrange­ments that may be reg­u­lat­ed by ASIC under the Cor­po­ra­tions Act 2001 (Cor­po­ra­tions Act) and Aus­tralian Secu­ri­ties and Invest­ments Com­mis­sion Act 2001 (ASIC Act).

ASIC con­sid­ers that cer­tain crowd fund­ing arrange­ments may involve:

  • offer­ing or adver­tis­ing a finan­cial prod­uct, pro­vid­ing a finan­cial ser­vice or fundrais­ing through secu­ri­ties requir­ing a com­ply­ing dis­clo­sure doc­u­ment; or

  • a man­aged invest­ment scheme under Chap­ter 5C of the Cor­po­ra­tions Act, the pro­vi­sion of finan­cial ser­vices requir­ing an Aus­tralian finan­cial ser­vices (AFS) licence or a fundrais­ing under Chap­ter 6D of the Cor­po­ra­tions Act.

These activ­i­ties are reg­u­lat­ed by ASIC under the Cor­po­ra­tions Act and ASIC Act and may impose oner­ous legal oblig­a­tions on oper­a­tors of crowd fund­ing sites and on peo­ple using those sites to raise funds.

ASIC has also high­light­ed some risks for oper­a­tors of crowd fund­ing web­sites and peo­ple con­sid­er­ing par­tic­i­pat­ing in crowd fund­ing projects. In sum­ma­ry, the risks high­light­ed were:

  • a risk of fraud being car­ried out through crowd fund­ing websites;

  • a risk that fund­ed projects are not com­plet­ed and the project spon­sors do not receive the rewards promised;

  • a risk that the mon­ey col­lect­ed is lost due to the fraud or bank­rupt­cy of the web­site oper­a­tor before the mon­ey is passed on to the project creator.

For more infor­ma­tion on how to use a crowd fund­ing web­site and the reg­u­la­tions which apply, please contact:

If you would like to repub­lish this arti­cle, it is gen­er­al­ly approved, but pri­or to doing so please con­tact the Mar­ket­ing team at marketing@​swaab.​com.​au. This arti­cle is not legal advice and the views and com­ments are of a gen­er­al nature only. This arti­cle is not to be relied upon in sub­sti­tu­tion for detailed legal advice.

Publications

Work­place Rela­tion­ships: The Legal Posi­tion (Cold­play Con­cert Edition)

The recent sto­ry of col­leagues (a Chief Exec­u­tive Offi­cer and Chief Peo­ple Offi­cer (CPO)) whose appar­ent rela­tion­ship was cap­tured on…

Dis­missal for Dissent?

The recent unfair dis­missal deci­sion of the Fair Work Com­mis­sion, Shaun Turn­er v Dare­bin City Coun­cil [2025] FWC 1763, in which Deputy…

Con­struc­tion con­tract time­frames and their inter­ac­tion with the NSW Secu­ri­ty of Pay­ment legislation.

Mark Glynn, Con­struc­tion Part­ner at Swaab con­sid­ers the recent deci­sion of Shar­vain Facades Pty Ltd (Admin­is­tra­tors Appoint­ed) v Roberts Co (NSW)…

In the News

Press Release | New Spe­cial Coun­sel Appoint­ment — Peter Bournas

Peter brings more than 20 years of senior legal and prop­er­ty exper­tise, span­ning pri­vate prac­tice, in-house roles with­in the air­port sec­tor…

Michael Byrnes appeared on Break­fast with Tim Web­ster on 2SM on 23 July 2025 to dis­cuss work­place rela­tion­ships and that Cold­play concert

Michael Byrnes appeared on Break­fast with Tim Web­ster on 2SM on 23 July 2025 to dis­cuss work­place rela­tion­ships and that…

Michael Byrnes is quot­ed in the arti­cle, Cold­play con­tro­ver­sy expos­es HR vul­ner­a­bil­i­ty in lead­er­ship rela­tion­ships”, pub­lished in HR Leader on 23 July 2025

Michael Byrnes is quot­ed in the arti­cle, ​“Cold­play con­tro­ver­sy expos­es HR vul­ner­a­bil­i­ty in lead­er­ship rela­tion­ships”, pub­lished in HR Leader on…

Sign up for our Newsletter

*Mandatory information