Each year at least 1 in 5 Aus­tralians over the age of 16 expe­ri­ence men­tal ill­ness. The most com­mon men­tal ill­ness­es are depres­sion and anx­i­ety and oth­er forms include bipo­lar dis­or­der and schizophrenia.

It is com­mon for peo­ple to expe­ri­ence men­tal ill­ness dur­ing dif­fi­cult times in their lives such as sep­a­ra­tion and divorce.

In par­ent­ing mat­ters before the Fam­i­ly Court the pri­ma­ry con­sid­er­a­tion is the best inter­ests of the chil­dren and pro­tect­ing them from harm, includ­ing psy­cho­log­i­cal and emo­tion­al harm. Any dis­tress or anx­i­ety expe­ri­enced by chil­dren as a result of a par­en­t’s health issues are rel­e­vant con­sid­er­a­tions for the Court.

In cir­cum­stances where the men­tal health of a par­ent is being man­aged and their con­di­tion does not impact adverse­ly on the chil­dren then there is no rea­son why the chil­dren should not spend time or live with that parent.

If the chil­dren are like­ly to be affect­ed by a par­en­t’s men­tal health issues then the time between that par­ent and the chil­dren is like­ly to be reduced or stopped. Usu­al­ly grad­u­al­ly increas­ing time with the chil­dren as the par­en­t’s health improves and the chil­dren become more set­tled, may be in the best inter­ests of the chil­dren. Where the par­en­t’s men­tal health is such that there is a risk to the chil­dren, then pro­tect­ing the chil­dren from any risk will be the Court’s pri­or­i­ty and that they may mean that con­tact with the chil­dren needs to be super­vised or stopped.

If you would like to repub­lish this arti­cle, it is gen­er­al­ly approved, but pri­or to doing so please con­tact the Mar­ket­ing team at marketing@​swaab.​com.​au. This arti­cle is not legal advice and the views and com­ments are of a gen­er­al nature only. This arti­cle is not to be relied upon in sub­sti­tu­tion for detailed legal advice.

Publications

Decen­ni­al insur­ance for new apart­ment buildings

The New South Wales Gov­ern­ment con­tin­ues to address the lack of con­fi­dence in the build­ing indus­try, par­tic­u­lar­ly in rela­tion to…

More AI Slop in the Fair Work Juris­dic­tion: The Fight Back

In two recent cas­es both the Fair Work Com­mis­sion (FWC) and Fed­er­al Cir­cuit and Fam­i­ly Court of Aus­tralia (FCF­CoA) have…

NSW Build­ing (Approvals and Prac­ti­tion­ers) Bill 2026 Pass­es Parliament

The Build­ing (Approvals and Prac­ti­tion­ers) Bill 2026 (the Bill) passed through Par­lia­ment on Tues­day after­noon 4 August 2026. The Bill is…

In the News

Michael Byrnes’ arti­cle A per­ma­nent change: casu­al choice for employ­ees under the recent Fair Work Act amend­ments ”, was pub­lished on the NSW Law Soci­ety Jour­nal web­site on 4 Sep­tem­ber 2026

This arti­cle exam­ines recent amend­ments to Aus­trali­a’s Fair Work Act and their impli­ca­tions for casu­al employ­ment, employ­ee choice, work­place rights…

Michael Byrnes appeared on the Mum­brel­la­cast pod­cast with Tim Bur­rowes and Irene Hulme on 3 Sep­tem­ber 2026 to dis­cuss the lat­est devel­op­ments in the pro­ceed­ings brought by Jack­ie​‘O’ Hen­der­son against ARN

Mum­brel­la’s Tim Bur­rowes and Irene Hulme take a deep dive into the legal morass of the ARN/​Jackie Hen­der­son law­suit with lawyer…

Michael Byrnes appeared on McK­night Tonight with Robert McK­night on 2 Sep­tem­ber 2026 to dis­cuss the lat­est devel­op­ments in the pro­ceed­ings brought by Jack­ie​‘O’ Hen­der­son against ARN (from 11:25 to 35:50)

Kyle Sandi­lands called as a wit­ness in Jack­ie O Henderson’s case against ARN, Michael Byrnes appears on McK­night Tonight with Robert McK­night…

Sign up for our Newsletter

*Mandatory information