Each year at least 1 in 5 Aus­tralians over the age of 16 expe­ri­ence men­tal ill­ness. The most com­mon men­tal ill­ness­es are depres­sion and anx­i­ety and oth­er forms include bipo­lar dis­or­der and schizophrenia.

It is com­mon for peo­ple to expe­ri­ence men­tal ill­ness dur­ing dif­fi­cult times in their lives such as sep­a­ra­tion and divorce.

In par­ent­ing mat­ters before the Fam­i­ly Court the pri­ma­ry con­sid­er­a­tion is the best inter­ests of the chil­dren and pro­tect­ing them from harm, includ­ing psy­cho­log­i­cal and emo­tion­al harm. Any dis­tress or anx­i­ety expe­ri­enced by chil­dren as a result of a par­en­t’s health issues are rel­e­vant con­sid­er­a­tions for the Court.

In cir­cum­stances where the men­tal health of a par­ent is being man­aged and their con­di­tion does not impact adverse­ly on the chil­dren then there is no rea­son why the chil­dren should not spend time or live with that parent.

If the chil­dren are like­ly to be affect­ed by a par­en­t’s men­tal health issues then the time between that par­ent and the chil­dren is like­ly to be reduced or stopped. Usu­al­ly grad­u­al­ly increas­ing time with the chil­dren as the par­en­t’s health improves and the chil­dren become more set­tled, may be in the best inter­ests of the chil­dren. Where the par­en­t’s men­tal health is such that there is a risk to the chil­dren, then pro­tect­ing the chil­dren from any risk will be the Court’s pri­or­i­ty and that they may mean that con­tact with the chil­dren needs to be super­vised or stopped.

If you would like to repub­lish this arti­cle, it is gen­er­al­ly approved, but pri­or to doing so please con­tact the Mar­ket­ing team at marketing@​swaab.​com.​au. This arti­cle is not legal advice and the views and com­ments are of a gen­er­al nature only. This arti­cle is not to be relied upon in sub­sti­tu­tion for detailed legal advice.

Publications

No Appor­tion­ment for Sec­tion 37 DBP Act Claims even where the alleged con­cur­rent wrong­do­er is not a sub­con­trac­tor of the builder:

Kapi­la v Mon­u­ment Build­ing Group Pty Ltd [2025] NSWSC 1306 con­firms that builders and nom­i­nat­ed super­vi­sors can be held ful­ly liable…

Tem­po­rary Dis­con­for­mi­ty in Build­ing Defects: Myth, Not Law

The ​“tem­po­rary dis­con­for­mi­ty” argu­ment in con­struc­tion dis­putes sug­gests that defec­tive work iden­ti­fied before prac­ti­cal com­ple­tion is not a breach while the…

The impor­tance of a Request for Tender

Issu­ing a request for ten­der (RFT) is more than just secur­ing the best or low­est price. An RFT is your oppor­tu­ni­ty to man­age…

In the News

The legal­i­ty of the Mar­ried at First Sight dis­missals”, pub­lished in HR Leader on 17 April 2026, Michael Byrnes is quoted.

Employ­ment issues sur­faced in this year’s sea­son of real­i­ty TV show Mar­ried at First Sight (MAFS), with rumours emerg­ing that…

Legal Essen­tials for Off Site Con­struc­tion | UNSW Sydney

A two-day con­struc­tion law short course equip­ping con­struc­tion and legal pro­fes­sion­als with the pro­cure­ment, reg­u­la­to­ry and dis­pute exper­tise required to…

Michael Byrnes is quot­ed in the arti­cle, We asked a lawyer to unpack Jack­ie O’s $82m case, and where it could land for ARN and Kyle”, pub­lished in Medi­aweek on 9 April 2026

Michael Byrnes is quot­ed in the arti­cle, ​“We asked a lawyer to unpack Jack­ie O’s $82m case, and where it could…

Sign up for our Newsletter

*Mandatory information