In brief — Landlord/​tenant rela­tion­ship, lease agree­ments and good faith negotiations

If a telecom­mu­ni­ca­tions provider (tel­co) wish­es to install a telecom­mu­ni­ca­tions facil­i­ty on your land, you need to be aware of the points to be includ­ed in a lease agree­ment and the tel­co’s oblig­a­tion to nego­ti­ate in good faith. It is crit­i­cal that the lease agree­ment is prop­er­ly nego­ti­at­ed, oth­er­wise the land­lord could face sig­nif­i­cant lia­bil­i­ty if the facil­i­ty is allowed to fall in dis­re­pair and the tel­co has no oblig­a­tion to main­tain it. 


Back­ground — Increas­ing impor­tance of mobile phone coverage

Mobile tele­phone cov­er­age is becom­ing increas­ing­ly impor­tant as more peo­ple choose to have mobile broad­band in their homes. Telecom­mu­ni­ca­tions providers are need­ing to secure the facil­i­ties they cur­rent­ly have and poten­tial­ly install new facil­i­ties. Facil­i­ties are installed on res­i­den­tial build­ings and not just on com­mer­cial buildings.

There are three things you need to know if a tel­co wish­es to install a telecom­mu­ni­ca­tions facil­i­ty in a build­ing you own.

Tenant/​landlord relationship

The tel­co will be the ten­ant and the own­er of the build­ing the facil­i­ty is installed in will be the land­lord. If the facil­i­ty is being installed in a res­i­den­tial apart­ment build­ing, the own­ers cor­po­ra­tion will be the landlord.

Lease agree­ment between land­lord and tenant

The lease agree­ment between the par­ties should con­tain the points below.

  • It is crit­i­cal that the tel­co agrees to keep its equip­ment in good repair (includ­ing any struc­tur­al or cap­i­tal expen­di­ture that is required to do so) and agrees to fix dam­age that is caused by third par­ties and acts of God. The land­lord should be enti­tled to inspect the facil­i­ty from time to time in the com­pa­ny and under the direc­tion of an employ­ee of the telco.
  • The land­lord should not make any war­ranties in rela­tion to the build­ing. It would be appro­pri­ate for a land­lord to agree to keep the site of the premis­es in good repair sub­ject to fair wear and tear and the oblig­a­tions of the tel­co under the lease.
  • All per­mits and licences for the instal­la­tion of the facil­i­ty must be obtained by and at the cost of the telco.
  • The tel­co should be required to take out pub­lic lia­bil­i­ty insur­ance of an ade­quate amount, for exam­ple $20 mil­lion per event. This insur­ance should not be lim­it­ed in an aggre­gate amount or (in the case of injury, loss or dam­age to third par­ties) reduced because of any action of the land­lord. This pro­vi­sion is crit­i­cal as a land­lord may not be able to take out insur­ance against loss caused or con­tributed to by the facil­i­ty in some cases.
  • All of the land­lord’s legal fees must be payable by the tel­co. A tel­co will be nego­ti­at­ing a num­ber of leas­es at one time and so nego­ti­a­tions can take some time.
  • If you are grant­i­ng an option to the tel­co for a fur­ther term, a rel­e­vant item for con­sid­er­a­tion is the extent to which the tel­co is required to upgrade the tech­nol­o­gy used in the facil­i­ty to ensure the facil­i­ty remains safe and com­plies with any future require­ments for elec­tro­mag­net­ic radi­a­tion, among oth­er things.
Nego­ti­at­ing in good faith 

A tel­co is giv­en the right to enter on land and to install a facil­i­ty on it by the Telecom­mu­ni­ca­tions Act (Cth) 1997, but before it can do so it is required to make rea­son­able efforts to nego­ti­ate in good faith with the own­er of the land (among oth­er things).

If you have any ques­tions about an exist­ing or pro­posed telecom­mu­ni­ca­tions facil­i­ty on your land, please contact:

If you would like to repub­lish this arti­cle, it is gen­er­al­ly approved, but pri­or to doing so please con­tact the Mar­ket­ing team at marketing@​swaab.​com.​au. This arti­cle is not legal advice and the views and com­ments are of a gen­er­al nature only. This arti­cle is not to be relied upon in sub­sti­tu­tion for detailed legal advice.

Publications

Assess­ing Scope 3 Emis­sions: An analy­sis of the impli­ca­tions of Den­man Aberdeen Muswell­brook Scone Healthy Envi­ron­ment Group Inc v MACH Ener­gy Aus­tralia Pty Ltd [2025] NSW­CA 163 (the Mount Pleas­ant decision)

Intro­duc­tionOn July 24, 2025, the New South Wales Court of Appeal (NSW­CA) deliv­ered a land­mark rul­ing in Den­man Aberdeen Muswell­brook Scone…

Work­place Rela­tion­ships: The Legal Posi­tion (Cold­play Con­cert Edition)

The recent sto­ry of col­leagues (a Chief Exec­u­tive Offi­cer and Chief Peo­ple Offi­cer (CPO)) whose appar­ent rela­tion­ship was cap­tured on…

Dis­missal for Dissent?

The recent unfair dis­missal deci­sion of the Fair Work Com­mis­sion, Shaun Turn­er v Dare­bin City Coun­cil [2025] FWC 1763, in which Deputy…

In the News

Michael Byrnes is quot­ed in the arti­cle, Employ­ee award­ed $305k in record sex­u­al harass­ment pay­out”, pub­lished in HRM Online on 12 August 2025

Michael Byrnes is quot­ed in the arti­cle, ​“Employ­ee award­ed $305k in record sex­u­al harass­ment pay­out”, pub­lished in HRM Online on…

Michael Byrnes appeared on Mon­ey News with Evan Lucas on 2GB on 4 August 2025 to dis­cuss the pro­posed Vic­to­ri­an state gov­ern­ment work from home laws

Michael Byrnes appeared on Mon­ey News with Evan Lucas on 2GB on 4 August 2025 to dis­cuss the pro­posed Vic­to­ri­an state gov­ern­ment…

Julie Briscoe attend­ed an event last night host­ed by NSW Gov­er­nor Mar­garet Bea­z­ley, cel­e­brat­ing Tour de Cure’s sup­port for world-class can­cer research breakthroughs.

Her Excel­len­cy the Hon­ourable Mar­garet Bea­z­ley AC KC, Gov­er­nor of New South Wales, and patron of Tour de Cure, host­ed…

Sign up for our Newsletter

*Mandatory information