In brief — List­ed com­pa­nies now need a trad­ing policy

From 1 Jan­u­ary 2011 list­ed com­pa­nies are required under ASX List­ing Rule 12.9 to adopt a trad­ing pol­i­cy. Trad­ing poli­cies are designed to reduce the poten­tial for con­flicts of inter­est and insid­er trading.


Black­out periods 

Dur­ing a black­out peri­od, direc­tors and senior staff are pre­vent­ed from trad­ing in their com­pa­ny’s stock. They are per­mit­ted to trade this stock at any time out­side the des­ig­nat­ed black­out peri­od. The time out­side the black­out peri­od is known as a trad­ing win­dow.

Accord­ing to the ASX, the typ­i­cal black­out peri­od is the peri­od between the close of the com­pa­ny’s finan­cial books and the release to the mar­ket of the com­pa­ny’s half year­ly or annu­al accounts. How­ev­er, many organ­i­sa­tions also have black­out peri­ods for oth­er occasions. 

What you need to consider 

There are var­i­ous ques­tions you need to ask your­self when for­mu­lat­ing a trad­ing pol­i­cy for your cor­po­ra­tion. These include:

  • Who with­in the com­pa­ny will the pol­i­cy apply to?
  • When will there be black­out periods?
  • Which class­es of secu­ri­ty will the black­out peri­ods apply to?
  • Will any excep­tions be grant­ed? If so, to whom?
  • Is the trad­ing pol­i­cy in breach of the Cor­po­ra­tions Act or ASX List­ing Rules?
Com­mu­ni­cate the policy 

The imple­men­ta­tion of a trad­ing pol­i­cy was until very recent­ly a vol­un­tary process. How­ev­er, as it is now com­pul­so­ry, it is impor­tant that all list­ed com­pa­nies cre­ate and imple­ment such a pol­i­cy and ensure that it is effec­tive­ly com­mu­ni­cat­ed to all direc­tors and senior staff. 

As insid­er trad­ing attracts severe penal­ties, includ­ing impris­on­ment, it is imper­a­tive that this new require­ment is not treat­ed as a mere formality.

For fur­ther infor­ma­tion please contact:

If you would like to repub­lish this arti­cle, it is gen­er­al­ly approved, but pri­or to doing so please con­tact the Mar­ket­ing team at marketing@​swaab.​com.​au. This arti­cle is not legal advice and the views and com­ments are of a gen­er­al nature only. This arti­cle is not to be relied upon in sub­sti­tu­tion for detailed legal advice.

Publications

Work­place Rela­tion­ships: The Legal Posi­tion (Cold­play Con­cert Edition)

The recent sto­ry of col­leagues (a Chief Exec­u­tive Offi­cer and Chief Peo­ple Offi­cer (CPO)) whose appar­ent rela­tion­ship was cap­tured on…

Dis­missal for Dissent?

The recent unfair dis­missal deci­sion of the Fair Work Com­mis­sion, Shaun Turn­er v Dare­bin City Coun­cil [2025] FWC 1763, in which Deputy…

Con­struc­tion con­tract time­frames and their inter­ac­tion with the NSW Secu­ri­ty of Pay­ment legislation.

Mark Glynn, Con­struc­tion Part­ner at Swaab con­sid­ers the recent deci­sion of Shar­vain Facades Pty Ltd (Admin­is­tra­tors Appoint­ed) v Roberts Co (NSW)…

In the News

Michael Byrnes appeared on Break­fast with Tim Web­ster on 2SM on 23 July 2025 to dis­cuss work­place rela­tion­ships and that Cold­play concert

Michael Byrnes appeared on Break­fast with Tim Web­ster on 2SM on 23 July 2025 to dis­cuss work­place rela­tion­ships and that…

Michael Byrnes is quot­ed in the arti­cle, Cold­play con­tro­ver­sy expos­es HR vul­ner­a­bil­i­ty in lead­er­ship rela­tion­ships”, pub­lished in HR Leader on 23 July 2025

Michael Byrnes is quot­ed in the arti­cle, ​“Cold­play con­tro­ver­sy expos­es HR vul­ner­a­bil­i­ty in lead­er­ship rela­tion­ships”, pub­lished in HR Leader on…

Michael Byrnes’ arti­cle 7 com­mon ques­tions about work­place rela­tion­ships”, was pub­lished on HRM Online on 22 July 2025

Michael Byrnes’ arti­cle ​“7 com­mon ques­tions about work­place rela­tion­ships”, was pub­lished on HRM Online on 22 July 2025To read the full…

Sign up for our Newsletter

*Mandatory information