In brief — List­ed com­pa­nies now need a trad­ing policy

From 1 Jan­u­ary 2011 list­ed com­pa­nies are required under ASX List­ing Rule 12.9 to adopt a trad­ing pol­i­cy. Trad­ing poli­cies are designed to reduce the poten­tial for con­flicts of inter­est and insid­er trading.


Black­out periods 

Dur­ing a black­out peri­od, direc­tors and senior staff are pre­vent­ed from trad­ing in their com­pa­ny’s stock. They are per­mit­ted to trade this stock at any time out­side the des­ig­nat­ed black­out peri­od. The time out­side the black­out peri­od is known as a trad­ing win­dow.

Accord­ing to the ASX, the typ­i­cal black­out peri­od is the peri­od between the close of the com­pa­ny’s finan­cial books and the release to the mar­ket of the com­pa­ny’s half year­ly or annu­al accounts. How­ev­er, many organ­i­sa­tions also have black­out peri­ods for oth­er occasions. 

What you need to consider 

There are var­i­ous ques­tions you need to ask your­self when for­mu­lat­ing a trad­ing pol­i­cy for your cor­po­ra­tion. These include:

  • Who with­in the com­pa­ny will the pol­i­cy apply to?
  • When will there be black­out periods?
  • Which class­es of secu­ri­ty will the black­out peri­ods apply to?
  • Will any excep­tions be grant­ed? If so, to whom?
  • Is the trad­ing pol­i­cy in breach of the Cor­po­ra­tions Act or ASX List­ing Rules?
Com­mu­ni­cate the policy 

The imple­men­ta­tion of a trad­ing pol­i­cy was until very recent­ly a vol­un­tary process. How­ev­er, as it is now com­pul­so­ry, it is impor­tant that all list­ed com­pa­nies cre­ate and imple­ment such a pol­i­cy and ensure that it is effec­tive­ly com­mu­ni­cat­ed to all direc­tors and senior staff. 

As insid­er trad­ing attracts severe penal­ties, includ­ing impris­on­ment, it is imper­a­tive that this new require­ment is not treat­ed as a mere formality.

For fur­ther infor­ma­tion please contact:

If you would like to repub­lish this arti­cle, it is gen­er­al­ly approved, but pri­or to doing so please con­tact the Mar­ket­ing team at marketing@​swaab.​com.​au. This arti­cle is not legal advice and the views and com­ments are of a gen­er­al nature only. This arti­cle is not to be relied upon in sub­sti­tu­tion for detailed legal advice.

Publications

No Appor­tion­ment for Sec­tion 37 DBP Act Claims even where the alleged con­cur­rent wrong­do­er is not a sub­con­trac­tor of the builder:

Kapi­la v Mon­u­ment Build­ing Group Pty Ltd [2025] NSWSC 1306 con­firms that builders and nom­i­nat­ed super­vi­sors can be held ful­ly liable…

Tem­po­rary Dis­con­for­mi­ty in Build­ing Defects: Myth, Not Law

The ​“tem­po­rary dis­con­for­mi­ty” argu­ment in con­struc­tion dis­putes sug­gests that defec­tive work iden­ti­fied before prac­ti­cal com­ple­tion is not a breach while the…

The impor­tance of a Request for Tender

Issu­ing a request for ten­der (RFT) is more than just secur­ing the best or low­est price. An RFT is your oppor­tu­ni­ty to man­age…

In the News

Michael Byrnes appeared on the Game Chang­ers Radio pod­cast host­ed by Craig Bruce and Irene Hulme on 24 April 2026 to dis­cuss the Fed­er­al Court case man­age­ment hear­ing in the sep­a­rate legal pro­ceed­ings com­menced by Kyle Sandi­lands and Jack­ie O’ Henderson

Michael Byrnes appeared on the Game Chang­ers Radio pod­cast host­ed by Craig Bruce and Irene Hulme on 24 April 202…

2026 Mer­i­tas Women’s Lead­er­ship Award, Return­er of the Year | Sarah Heuvel

Sarah Heuv­el, a Part­ner in our Prop­er­ty & Com­mer­cial team, has been recog­nised with a Mer­i­tas Women’s Lead­er­ship Award for her con­tri­bu­tion to…

Michael Byrnes appeared on the Game Chang­ers Radio pod­cast host­ed by Craig Bruce and Irene Hulme on 22 April 2026 to dis­cuss the lat­est devel­op­ments in the legal pro­ceed­ings com­menced by Kyle Sandi­lands against ARN

Michael Byrnes appeared on the Game Chang­ers Radio pod­cast host­ed by Craig Bruce and Irene Hulme on 22 April 202…

Sign up for our Newsletter

*Mandatory information