In Brief

One of the first con­sid­er­a­tions with any type of new ven­ture is how to pro­tect your busi­ness, valu­able idea or con­cept if you need to dis­close it to others.


When is a con­fi­den­tial­i­ty agree­ment needed?

If you need to dis­close your valu­able busi­ness infor­ma­tion or ideas to a poten­tial part­ner, advis­er or investor then a con­fi­den­tial­i­ty agree­ment is an essen­tial tool.

What is a con­fi­den­tial­i­ty agreement?

A ​“Con­fi­den­tial­i­ty Agree­ment” or a ​“Non-Dis­clo­sure Agree­ment” is a legal­ly bind­ing con­tract which con­tains promis­es from the recip­i­ent of the con­fi­den­tial infor­ma­tion to lim­it the use of the infor­ma­tion to a spe­cif­ic purpose.

Con­fi­den­tial­i­ty agree­ment tips

A con­fi­den­tial­i­ty agree­ment must do three things:

  • define what infor­ma­tion is ​“con­fi­den­tial information”
  • iden­ti­fy the spe­cif­ic pur­pose the for which infor­ma­tion will be supplied
  • restrict its dis­clo­sure and iden­ti­fy any per­mis­si­ble disclosures.

The fol­low­ing state­ments should be includ­ed (if applicable):

  • dis­clo­sure is not intend­ed to trans­fer any rights in such information
  • there is no exclu­siv­i­ty grant­ed to the recip­i­ent in the con­fi­den­tial information
  • there is no oblig­a­tion on the dis­clos­er to pro­vide con­fi­den­tial information
  • the sup­ply of con­fi­den­tial infor­ma­tion does not con­sti­tute an offer of any kind
  • no war­ran­ty is giv­en about the accu­ra­cy or com­plete­ness of the information.

The fol­low­ing state­ments should be includ­ed (if applicable):

  • the recip­i­ent must keep the infor­ma­tion confidential
  • the recip­i­ent is respon­si­ble for any unau­tho­rised disclosure
  • the recip­i­ent acknowl­edges that breach of the agree­ment may cause loss to the discloser
  • the recip­i­ent indem­ni­fies the dis­clos­er for any loss aris­ing from the recipient’s breach of the agreement
  • the recip­i­ent must return all con­fi­den­tial infor­ma­tion on demand
  • the recip­i­ent agrees not to solic­it or approach employ­ees, cus­tomers or sup­pli­ers of the dis­clos­er or inter­fere with its business.

The fol­low­ing state­ments should be includ­ed (if applicable):

  • the term of the agree­ment – how long the agree­ment should be in force
  • gov­ern­ing law and juris­dic­tion – the laws of which state or coun­try should apply.

If you would like any fur­ther infor­ma­tion please contact:

If you would like to repub­lish this arti­cle, it is gen­er­al­ly approved, but pri­or to doing so please con­tact the Mar­ket­ing team at marketing@​swaab.​com.​au. This arti­cle is not legal advice and the views and com­ments are of a gen­er­al nature only. This arti­cle is not to be relied upon in sub­sti­tu­tion for detailed legal advice.

Publications

Employ­ers Ban­ning AI Smart Glass­es from the Workplace

Can employ­ers ban AI smart glass­es at work? As wear­able AI tech­nol­o­gy grows, busi­ness­es are nav­i­gat­ing pri­va­cy, cyber­se­cu­ri­ty, work­place sur­veil­lance…

Land­lords Beware: New Tobac­co Laws Could Mean Heavy Fines and Even Gaol Time

How Do New Tobac­co Laws Affect Land­lords in NSW?This year the NSW State Gov­ern­ment is crack­ing down on the sale of…

When is entry into a lot with­out the lot own­er’s con­sent per­mit­ted to car­ry out repair work to com­mon prop­er­ty? When there is an emergency

When is entry into a lot with­out the lot own­er’s con­sent per­mit­ted to car­ry out repair work to com­mon prop­er­ty? When…

In the News

Michael Byrnes appeared on McK­night Tonight with Robert McK­night on 4 Novem­ber 2026 to dis­cuss the lat­est devel­op­ments in the Jack­ie ​‘O’ Hen­der­son v ARN case (from 3:42 to 18:30)

Analy­sis of the lat­est Fed­er­al Court devel­op­ments in Jack­ie O’s case against ARN, includ­ing priv­i­lege rul­ings, the board memo and…

Michael Byrnes is quot­ed in the arti­cle, ​“Mel­bourne Cup – a giant red flag, or a bit of fun?”, pub­lished in HR Leader on 3 Novem­ber 2026

Is the Mel­bourne Cup a Work­place Cul­ture Risk? HR Guid­ance on Inclu­sion, Alco­hol and Employ­ee Wellbeing.Michael Byrnes is quot­ed in the arti­cle…

Michael Byrnes is quot­ed in the arti­cle, ​“Good HR gone bad – who is respon­si­ble when HR are in hot water?”, pub­lished in HR Leader on 30 Octo­ber 2026

Who is legal­ly respon­si­ble for work­place dis­putes, mis­con­duct and employ­ment law breaches?Michael Byrnes is quot­ed in the arti­cle, ​“Good HR gone…

Sign up for our Newsletter

*Mandatory information