Employ­ers should be aware that employ­ees have the right to request a change in work­ing arrange­ments to assist the employ­ee in car­ing for a child. Such a request is often made while an employ­ee is on parental leave and is often a request to return to work in a part time capac­i­ty. The employ­er may refuse such a request on rea­son­able busi­ness grounds.

The right to request” (as it is called) is enshrined in the Nation­al Employ­ment Stan­dards con­tained in the new Fair Work Act. It is avail­able to employ­ees who are par­ents and who have been employed for over 12 months. It may be made in respect of a child:

  • under school age; or
  • who is under 18 and has a disability.

The request must be in writ­ing and must set out the details for the change sought and the rea­sons for the change.

Long term casu­als also have the right to request such arrangements.

What the employ­er must do if it receives a request

With­in 21 days the employ­er must give the employ­ee a writ­ten response to the request stat­ing whether the employ­ee grants or refus­es the request.

If the employ­er decides to refuse the request, the writ­ten response must include details of the rea­sons for the refusal.

Employ­ers should con­sid­er requests on a case by case basis. Fun­da­men­tal to the Employer’s con­sid­er­a­tion will be what exact­ly the leg­is­la­tion means by a change in work­ing arrange­ments” and also what jus­ti­fies a refusal on rea­son­able busi­ness grounds”.

What is meant by a change in work­ing arrangements”?

The explana­to­ry mem­o­ran­dum to the Fair Work Act states that exam­ples of changes in work­ing arrange­ments include changes in hours of work, changes in pat­terns of work and changes in loca­tion of work.

Accord­ing­ly there is an argu­ment that a change in work­ing arrange­ments does not extend to the employ­ee chang­ing from a full time posi­tion to a part time position.

What is meant by rea­son­able busi­ness grounds”?

The explana­to­ry mem­o­ran­dum to the Fair Work Act states that the rea­son­able­ness of the grounds is a mat­ter to be assessed in the cir­cum­stances that apply at the time the request is made. Rea­sons for refusal may include:

  • The effect on the work­place and the employer’s business 
  • The inabil­i­ty to organ­ise work among exist­ing staff
  • The inabil­i­ty to recruit a replace­ment employee
Escape clause for employers

The Fair Work Act states that no order can be made under the Fair Work Act against the Employ­er sim­ply for refus­ing the request on rea­son­able busi­ness grounds.

How­ev­er, the employ­er still needs to have com­plied with its oblig­a­tions to respond to the request with­in 21 days and if the request is refused, to give rea­sons for the refusal.

Dis­crim­i­na­tion law also needs to be considered

Despite the above escape claus­es, the law does not sim­ply allow a carte blanche for Employ­ers to refuse a requests on rea­son­able busi­ness grounds.

A female employ­ee whose request has been refused may seek orders under the Sex Dis­crim­i­na­tion Act.

In a series of Fed­er­al Court cas­es, women who have encoun­tered dif­fi­cul­ties when seek­ing part time employ­ment after return­ing to work from mater­ni­ty leave have suc­cess­ful­ly argued that refusal to allow part time work has the effect of dis­ad­van­tag­ing women.

Accord­ing­ly, where a request is to be refused on rea­son­able busi­ness grounds, employ­ers should seek legal advice as to whether dis­crim­i­na­tion law will apply in the spe­cif­ic circumstances.

For fur­ther infor­ma­tion please contact:

If you would like to repub­lish this arti­cle, it is gen­er­al­ly approved, but pri­or to doing so please con­tact the Mar­ket­ing team at marketing@​swaab.​com.​au. This arti­cle is not legal advice and the views and com­ments are of a gen­er­al nature only. This arti­cle is not to be relied upon in sub­sti­tu­tion for detailed legal advice.

Publications

Copy­right and Gen­er­a­tive AI: what Aus­tralia can learn from the Meta and Anthrop­ic Rulings

In 2025, two U.S. court deci­sions, Kadrey v. Meta and Bartz v. Anthrop­ic, have pro­vid­ed the first real judi­cial answers…

Fed­er­al Court Deci­sion Lim­its Effec­tive Use of Set-Off in Con­trac­tu­al Annu­al Salary Arrangements

The Deci­sionIn a recent Fed­er­al Court deci­sion*, Jus­tice Per­ram held that while con­trac­tu­al set-off claus­es in an annu­al salary arrange­ment can…

Pro­tect­ing your tomor­row, today: The impor­tance of an endur­ing pow­er of attorney

We often talk about the impor­tance of draft­ing your estate plan­ning doc­u­ments, includ­ing how draft­ing your will can ensure your…

In the News

Sarah Heuv­el pro­vides insight into get­ting Rent Roll Trans­ac­tions Com­pli­ance Compliant

Sarah Heuv­el in an inter­view with Matthew Cial­lel­la of MC Broking & Advi­so­ry, dis­cuss rent roll trans­ac­tions and the three key…

Michael Byrnes appeared on Mon­ey News with Evan Lucas on 2GB on 8 Sep­tem­ber 2025 to dis­cuss the recent Fed­er­al Court deci­sion relat­ing to salary arrange­ments, set-off claus­es and award compliance

Michael Byrnes appeared on Mon­ey News with Evan Lucas on 2GB on 8 Sep­tem­ber 2025 to dis­cuss the recent Fed­er­al Court…

Michael Byrnes has pub­lished an arti­cle titled Use of AI Crit­i­cised by FWC” in HR Leader on 2 Sep­tem­ber 2025.

Michael Byrnes has pub­lished an arti­cle titled ​“Use of AI Crit­i­cised by FWC” in HR Leader on 2 Sep­tem­ber 2025.To read the…

Sign up for our Newsletter

*Mandatory information