All publications relating to ‘Mark Glynn’
When is entry into a lot without the lot owner’s consent permitted to carry out repair work to common property? When there is an emergency
When is entry into a lot without the lot owner’s consent permitted to carry out repair work to common property? When there is an emergency McArthur v The Owners – Strata Plan No. 30924 [2025] NSWCATCD 207 This case serves as a useful guide to owners corporation when considering accessing a lot under section 122(3) of the…
Decennial insurance for new apartment buildings
The New South Wales Government continues to address the lack of confidence in the building industry, particularly in relation to strata living with the recently passed Fair Trading and Building Legislation Amendment Bill 2026 laying the final piece of legislative groundwork required to bring Decennial Liability Insurance (DLI) to the market. On…
NSW Building (Approvals and Practitioners) Bill 2026 Passes Parliament
The Building (Approvals and Practitioners) Bill 2026 (the Bill) passed through Parliament on Tuesday afternoon 4 August 2026. The Bill is awaiting assent from the Governor and will commence on a date set by proclamation.Much of the practical operation and implication for those affected by the passing of this Bill will be…
A Higher Evidentiary Burden for Work Orders: The Practical Implications of The Owners – Strata Plan No 102171 v Ceerose Pty Ltd [2025] NSWCATCD 137
The decision in The Owners – Strata Plan No 102171 v Ceerose Pty Ltd; Zone Q Milsons Point Development Pty Ltd v Ceerose Pty Ltd; Ceerose Pty Ltd v Southern Cross Climate Control Pty Ltd [2025] NSWCATCD 137 is a significant development in understanding the evidentiary obligations of an applicant when seeking a work order under…
Strata Plan 92183 v Samdora Pty Ltd [2026] NSWSC 406 | 'Substantive Control' over Works & s37 of the DB&P Act
In this case, the plaintiff (Strata Plan 92183) brought proceedings alleging defective residential building work in relation to 9 town houses located in Mangerton, NSW.Relevantly SP92183 claimed that both the builder’s director (Mr Nassif) and the developer’s director (Mr Chahwan) had both breached their duty to exercise reasonable care to avoid economic…
No Apportionment for Section 37 DBP Act Claims even where the alleged concurrent wrongdoer is not a subcontractor of the builder
Kapila v Monument Building Group Pty Ltd [2025] NSWSC 1306 confirms that builders and nominated supervisors can be held fully liable for building defects under section 37 of the Design and Building Practitioners Act 2020 (NSW), even where other professionals, such as engineers, architects or certifiers, also contributed to the defects…
Temporary Disconformity in Building Defects: Myth, Not Law
The “temporary disconformity” argument in construction disputes suggests that defective work identified before practical completion is not a breach while the builder retains a contractual right to rectify. NSW courts have consistently rejected this proposition, confirming that defective work constitutes a breach at the time it is performed.The notion of “temporary disconformity” is sometimes…
The importance of a Request for Tender
Issuing a request for tender (RFT) is more than just securing the best or lowest price. An RFT is your opportunity to manage your project risk and to ensure your project is completed on time and within budget. Your RFT defines the rules of the game (tender process) and the final destination (the…
When can an owner commence proceedings in the 6 months after the expiry of the statutory warranty periods
When a defect claim emerges in the final six months of statutory warranty periods, owners may still have time to act. This update explains when proceedings can be commenced under the Home Building Act 1989 (NSW), following recent Supreme Court guidance.Owners corporations often discover defects in their buildings in the last 6 months…
Know Your Construction Contract — A Cautionary ‘Time Bar’ Tale from Westconnex M5 Motorway Tunnel Project Sydney
The NSW Court of Appeal has confirmed that Owners Corporations can seek freezing orders to stop developers using SPV structures from divesting assets, strengthening recovery prospects in defect litigation.Construction contracts often include detailed provisions setting out prescribed regimes for the provision of claims. Such regimes provide for the form and detail…